Team Case Study Research

Criteria

Exceeds Expectations

Meets Expectations

Doesn’t Meet Expectations

Points

Content

(130 pts.)

All components of the assignment have been explicitly addressed.

The content reflects graduate-level execution with clear evidence of critical thinking, synthesis of relevant information from credible sources, and clear mastery of the concepts necessary to successfully execute each component of the assignment.

The content is logically organized and contains only that information necessary meet the expectations of the assignment and does not contain content that could be considered superfluous or distracting.

All arguments, recommendation, and positions are logically presented and properly supported with credible or scholarly sources.

130 to 117 points

Most of the components of the assignment have been explicitly addressed. There are some aspects of the assignment that appear to have been implicitly addressed.

The content mostly reflects a graduate-level effort in the execution.  While there is evidence of critical thinking, synthesis of information from credible sources it isn’t consistent throughout the submission.

It appears that the student was somewhat comfortable with many of the concepts necessary to successfully complete each component of the assignment.

The content is mostly organized in a logical manner; however, it contains some content which could be considered superfluous and mildly distracting.

Most of the arguments, recommendations, and positions are logically present and supported with credible and scholarly sources.

116.9 to 104 points

Few of the components of the assignment have been explicitly addressed. Most of the components were either implicitly addressed or not covered.

The content is not consistent with what would typically associate with a graduate leaner. There is little evidence of critical thinking or synthesis of credible sources to support the completion of the assignment.

It appears that the student has little to not understanding of the concepts necessary to successfully address the components of the assignment.

The content isn’t well organized and difficult to follow. It contains a large amount of content which considered superfluous and distracting.

Few of the arguments, recommendations, or positions are logically presented and supported with appropriate sources.

103.9 to 0 points

 130

APA

(20 pts.)

Narrative submissions are prepared consistent with the APA Manual (6th edition) and include a title and reference page

Note: The instructor may adherence to certain APA form and style guidelines and not others based on the nature and scope of the project

Submissions that are required to be presented in a table, PowerPoint, or Excel format and whose content requires appropriate support from credible or scholarly sources, these sources are properly in-text cited and listed in a reference page consistent with the APA Manual (6th edition).

The submission contains very few or no grammatical, punctuation, syntax, and verb-tense agreement errors.

20 to 18 points

Narrative submissions are mostly consistent with the APA Manual (6th edition) and include a title and reference page.

Note: The instructor may adherence to certain APA form and style guidelines and not others based on the nature and scope of the project.

Submissions that are required to be presented in a table, PowerPoint, or Excel format and whose content requires appropriate support form credible or scholarly sources, these sources are mostly in-text cited and properly listed in the reference page consistent with the APA Manual (6th edition).

The submission contains some grammatical, punctuation, syntax, and verb-tense agreement errors.

17.9 to 16 points

Narrative submissions contain a large number of inconsistencies with the APA Manual (6th edition).

Note: The instructor may adherence to certain APA form and style guidelines and not others based on the nature and scope of the project.

Submissions that are required to be presented in a table, PowerPoint, or Excel format and whose content requires appropriate support from credible or scholarly courses, these sources aren’t properly in-text cited and listed in the reference page consistent with the APA Manual (6th edition).

The submission is poorly written and contains a large number of grammatical, punctuation, syntax, and verb-tense agreement errors.

15.9 to 0 points

 20

Length

(10 pts.)

The submission meets the length requirements as specified within the assignment expectations.

10 to 9 points

The submission is slightly outside page length requirements as specified within the assignment expectations. As a result, the student may have struggled to fully meet all of the assignment expectations.

8.99 to 8 points

The submission is not consistent with the page length requirement as specified within the assignment expectations. As a result, the student was largely unsuccessful in meeting the assignment expectations.

7.99 to o points

 10

Total Points

 160