CIS 353 Assignment 2

rubric.docx

Home >Computer Science homework help >CIS 353 Assignment 2

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 120	Assignment 2: Structural Modeling and Behavior Modeling
Criteria	Â Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Â Fair 70-79% C	Â Proficient 80-89% B	Â Exemplary 90-100% A
1. Create Class-Responsibility-Collaboration (CRC) cards and a class diagram based on the functional models through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 15%	Did not submit or incompletely created Class-Responsibility-Collaboration (CRC) cards and a class diagram based on the functional models through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Insufficiently created Class-Responsibility-Collaboration (CRC) cards and a class diagram based on the functional models through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Partially created Class-Responsibility-Collaboration (CRC) cards and a class diagram based on the functional models through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Satisfactorily created Class-Responsibility-Collaboration (CRC) cards and a class diagram based on the functional models through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Thoroughly created Class-Responsibility-Collaboration (CRC) cards and a class diagram based on the functional models through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.
2. Identify each use case in the functional model and create a sequence and communication diagram for each scenario of each use case identified through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely identified each use case in the functional model andÂ did not submit or incompletely created a sequence and communication diagram for each scenario of each use case identified through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Insufficiently identified each use case in the functional model and insufficiently created a sequence and communication diagram for each scenario of each use case identified through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Partially identified each use case in the functional model andÂ partially created a sequence and communication diagram for each scenario of each use case identified through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Satisfactorily identified each use case in the functional model and satisfactorilyÂ created a sequence and communication diagram for each scenario of each use case identified through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.	Thoroughly identified each use case in the functional model and thoroughly created a sequence and communication diagram for each scenario of each use case identified through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Word or Visio, or an open source alternative such as Dia.
3. Create a behavioral state machine for each of the complex classes in the class diagram. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely created a behavioral state machine for each of the complex classes in the class diagram.	Insufficiently created a behavioral state machine for each of the complex classes in the class diagram.	Partially created a behavioral state machine for each of the complex classes in the class diagram.	Satisfactorily created a behavioral state machine for each of the complex classes in the class diagram.	Thoroughly created a behavioral state machine for each of the complex classes in the class diagram.
4. Perform a CRUDE analysis to show the interactivity of the objects in the system. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely performed a CRUDE analysis to show the interactivity of the objects in the system.	Insufficiently performed a CRUDE analysis to show the interactivity of the objects in the system.	Partially performed a CRUDE analysis to show the interactivity of the objects in the system.	Satisfactorily performed a CRUDE analysis to show the interactivity of the objects in the system.	Thoroughly performed a CRUDE analysis to show the interactivity of the objects in the system.
5a. Perform a verification and validation walk-through of functional model. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely performed a verification and validation walk-through of functional model.	Insufficiently performed a verification and validation walk-through of functional model.	Partially performed a verification and validation walk-through of functional model.	Satisfactorily performed a verification and validation walk-through of functional model.	Thoroughly performed a verification and validation walk-through of functional model.
5b. Perform a verification and validation walk-through of structural model. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely performed a verification and validation walk-through of structural model.	Insufficiently performed a verification and validation walk-through of structural model.	Partially performed a verification and validation walk-through of structural model.	Satisfactorily performed a verification and validation walk-through of structural model.	Thoroughly performed a verification and validation walk-through of structural model.
5c. Perform a verification and validation walk-through of behavioral model. Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely performed a verification and validation walk-through of behavioral model.	Insufficiently performed a verification and validation walk-through of behavioral model.	Partially performed a verification and validation walk-through of behavioral model.	Satisfactorily performed a verification and validation walk-through of behavioral model.	Thoroughly performed a verification and validation walk-through of behavioral model.
6. Revise the requirements document created in Assignment 1 with additional information found in this assignment and document the assumptions.Â Weight: 10%	Did not submit or incompletely revised the requirements document created in Assignment 1 with additional information found in this assignmentÂ and did not submit or incompletely documented the assumptions.	Insufficiently revised the requirements document created in Assignment 1 with additional information found in this assignment and insufficiently documented the assumptions.	Partially revised the requirements document created in Assignment 1 with additional information found in this assignment and partially documented the assumptions.	Satisfactorily revised the requirements document created in Assignment 1 with additional information found in this assignment and satisfactorily documented the assumptions.	Thoroughly revised the requirements document created in Assignment 1 with additional information found in this assignment and thoroughly documented the assumptions.
7. 3 references Weight: 5%	No references provided	Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.	Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.	Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.	Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
8. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	More than 8 errors present	7-8 errors present	5-6 errors present	3-4 errors present	0-2 errors present