Q3

Criteria

Unacceptable

Up to 12 points

Acceptable 13 to 17 points

Outstanding

18 to 20 points

Score

Identifies Dilemma(s)

Has no idea or only a vague idea of the ethical dilemma(s).

Identifies the ethical dilemma or dilemmas.

Describes the dilemma(s) in detail, including most or all pertinent facts. Clarifies why it is an ethical dilemma.

Evaluate

Stakeholders

Is unsure about who the stakeholders are or does not identify any stakeholders.

Accurately identifies at least one important stakeholder who would be affected by the decision.

Accurately identifies several important stakeholders who would be affected by the decision and describes how they would be affected.

Analyzes Alternatives

and Consequences and impact on stakeholders

Does not identify alternatives and consequences or suggests alternatives that are not reasonable.

Identifies at least one reasonable alternative and its possible consequences.

Identifies at least two reasonable alternatives and their possible consequences.

Analysis of ethical schools of thought

Has no idea or only a vague idea of the ethical schools of thought

Has some idea of the ethical schools of thought

Explains thoroughly the ethical schools of thought and its application to the scenario.

Recommends a

decision

Provides a rationale for the decision

Does not recommend a decision or recommends a decision that does not reflect careful thought.

Provides no rationale or an inadequate rationale for the decision.

Recommends a decision that demonstrates some careful thought. Provides an adequate rationale for the decision.

Recommends a well thought

out, coherent, logical decision. Provides a strong rationale for the decision.

Total Points

0-69

Unacceptable

70-79

Acceptable

80-89

Good

90-100

Outstanding