| NSG 290 Module 4 Assignment | | | | Total Available Points = | | | 115 |
| Instructions: enter score (1-4) in column F |
| | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | | | Final |
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Score | Weight | Score |
| Tactics Witnessed | Student attempts to identify tactics witnessed in conflicts. Does not support ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks sufficient details and insights. | Student identifies tactics witnessed in conflicts. Supports some ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks details and/or insights. | Student addresses tactics witnessed in conflicts and describes why they are not helpful. Supports most ideas with evidence from the article. May lack details and/or insights. | Student develops a clear, comprehensive list of tactics witnessed in conflicts and describes why they are not helpful. Supports all ideas with evidence from the article. Reflects deep insights. | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Tactics Used | Student attempts to identify one tactic personally used in conflicts. Does not support ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks sufficient details and insights. | Student identifies one tactic personal used in conflict and attempts to state why it is not helpful. Supports some ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks details and/or insights. | Student addresses one tactic personally used in conflicts and describes why it is not helpful. Supports most ideas with evidence from the article. May lack details and/or insights. | Student develops a clear, comprehensive list of tactics personally used in conflicts and describes why they are not helpful. Supports all ideas with evidence from the article. Reflects deep insights. | | 20% | 0.00 |
| How Tactics Look in Conflict | Student attempts to identify examples of tactics in conflict. Does not support ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks sufficient details and insights. | Student identifies examples of tactics in conflict. Supports some ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks details and/or insights. | Student addresses examples of tactics in conflict. Supports most ideas with evidence from the article. May lack details and/or insights. | Student develops a clear, comprehensive list of examples of tactics in conflict. Supports all ideas with evidence from the article. Reflects deep insights. | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Better Strategies | Student attempts to identify examples of better tactics in conflict. Does not support ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks sufficient details and insights. | Student identifies examples of better tactics in conflict. Supports some ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks details and/or insights. | Student addresses examples of better tactics in conflict. Supports most ideas with evidence from the article. May lack details and/or insights. | Student develops a clear, comprehensive list of examples of better tactics in conflict. Supports all ideas with evidence from the article. Reflects deep insights. | | 20% | 0.00 |
| Handling Conflict | Student attempts to identify ways to handle someone using one of the tactics. Does not support ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks sufficient details and insights. | Student identifies ways to handle someone using one of the tactics. Supports some ideas with evidence from the article. Lacks details and/or insights. | Student addresses ways to handle someone using one of the tactics. Supports most ideas with evidence from the article. May lack details and/or insights. | Student develops a clear, comprehensive list of ways to handle someone using one of the tactics. Supports all ideas with evidence from the article. Reflects deep insights. | | 20% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | | 100% | 0.00 |
| | | | | | Final Score | | 0 |
| | | | | | Percentage | | 0.00% |
| Feedback: | | | 4 |
happiness2000
RUBICSWEEK4.xlsx
