wac final

Balayya79

rubicswacpaper.pdf

Home >English homework help >wac final

U IJ

(l\. l'td lll~

. Y

Y I"\"

- r Clt-'C

I n

u u

1 I\.

C riteria

Technical R

equirem ents:

\ G

ram m

ar, punctuation, spelling, typed, and double- spaced.Paper should be clearly w

ritten, and organized, as w

ell as free of gram

m atical

and spelling errors.

- -

~ -

C riteria

_L Subm it

743

r I ·EXCEEDS EXPECTATIO

I 20 points

Paper is technically flaw

less; .typed, double- spaced and~ follow

ed all instructions

EXC EED

S EXPEC

TA TIO

N S

C ancel

l·ci!Riifl I I_ M

EETS EXPE<;TATIO

15 points

M inor gram

m ar,

punctuation, &

spelling . errors; typed,

double-spaced. .fo

llow ed

instructions ..

M EETS

EXPEC TA

TIO N

C O

M PETEN

I 10 points

I Significant gram

m ar,

punctuation, & spelling errors, but

; 1 typed, double-

• I

spaced. Som

ew hat

follow ed

instructions.

C O

M P

E TE

N T

- - - - - - -

---------

EEDS

TI --PR ~VEM

EN : _

N O

T EVIDEN T

5 points I

0 points I

'G ram

m ar,

I G

ram m

ar, punctuation,

I punctuation, &

& spelling

i spelling errors are

errors are I

frequent and frequent and

distracting. N ot

distracting, but , I

typed or double- I

typed, double- I

spaced. spaced. D

id not Did not follow

instructions. instructions.

N EED

S IM

P R

O V

E M

E N

T /

N O

T EVID E

N T

:a..o..........._..._J ... _,.

_~ ~

- •. . . -

.. .c..._ ..:_

-·J..

CA) =-•~

m ~

~ · Prir

C riterion

Score

/ 20

Criterion Score

fJ fJ

.... J

C riteria

R esearch:

Paper m ust

display evidence that student

1 has a substantial am

ount of research regarding the chosen topic. A m

inim um

of 6 academ

ic journal articles is required.

Jt,

C riteria

Position

Subm it

EXCEEDS EXPECTATIO

20 points

R esearch is

w ell integrated

into the paper and

L M EETS

EXPECTATIO NS

-15 points

R esearch is

adequately integrated and

1 properly

docum ented. U

sed

docum ented.

U sed APA

form atting style.

All sources are academ

kally acceptable.

APA form atting

style. All sources

are academ ically

acceptable.

- · - · - -

-- ,---

· -

EXCEEDS I

M EETS

EXPEC TA

TIO N

S EXPEC

TA TIO

N S

20 points 15 points

,, C

ancel

CO M

PETENT NEEDS

NO T EVIDEN

T Criterion

IM PRO

VEM ENT

Score

10 points I

5 points 0 points

I 20

R esearch is

R esearch is not

N o evidence of

m inim

ally w

ell integrated. Is proper citing or

integrated and som

ew hat

paraphrasing. D id

docum ented. U

sed docum

ented. not use APA

APA form atting

U sed APA

form atting style.

style, w ith

form atting style,

Sources are not

m istakes.

w ith m

istakes. academ

ic.

Som e sources are

academ ic, others

not academ ically

are not. acceptable.

C O

M PETEN

T N

EED S

IM P

R O

V E

M E

N T

I N

O T EVID

EN T

Criterion Score

/ I

10 points 5 points

0 points I 20 - - -

C riteria

Position Statem

ent and C

om parison:

A rgum

ents for the position are organized in an effective w

ay. Student uses data and theory from

Peer review

ed acadeinic

I research to support position and deconstruct argum

ents on opposing side of the

Subm it

I I I I I EXCEEDS EXPECTATIO

20 points

Position is clearly stated in the introduction, throughout the structure of the paper and is carried .out through the conclusion.

_ j_

Cancel

I I I I I I I I M EETS

EXPECTATIO NS

15 points

·Position is stated in the lntroducti9n, but not adequately presented the structure of th paper.

CO M

PETENT

10 points I I

Position is clear I

but w eakly stated

throughout the paper. O

rganizing them e

of the paper is w

eak. W eak

deconstruction of opposing argum

ents

NEEDS IM

PRO VEM

ENT

5 points

Position is w

eakly stated in the introduction. O

rganizing them e

of argum ents

unclear. Paper m

entioned opposing argum

ents for stated position, but did not use data from

research to deconstruct the opposition.

/ y

N O

T EVID ENT

0 points

Position is not clearly stated in the introduction or consistent throughout the paper. Paper did not exam

ine or deconstruct opposing argum

ents.

C riterion

Score

I 20

C riteria

C ritical

th inking

and A

nalysis: P

aper m ust

display evidence that you have thought critically about w

hat you have read and discovered d

u rin

Jth e

course o

f your research rather than repeating w

hat the articles

Subm it

EXC EED

S E

X P

E C

TA TIO

N S

4 0

points

P aper ties

explanations o f

hum an behavior,

processes, or cultures to social science concepts or theory beyond those giv~n in the articles. E

xplains those ties accurately and fully at a level appropriate to

context.

C ancel

M EETS

E X

P E

C TA

TIO N

30 points

explanations o f

hum an behavior

processes, or cultures to

social science concepts or theory accurately and fully at a level appropriate to

context.

C O

M P

E TE

N T

20 points

A ttem

pts to tie explanations to specific social science concepts or theories but does not develop them

fully

N EED

S N

O T EV

ID E

N T

Criterion I

IM P

R O

V E

M E

N T

Score

l 10 points

0 points I

I 40 I

A ttem

pts to tie •

N o application of

explanations to sociological

specific social concepts or

science concepts theories to

or theories, but analysis of to

pic explanations are unclear and/or incor.rect.