Critical analysis Visa vs Master card

15.0 to >13.9 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Paper includes a professional looking title page, an organized table of contents, all the relevant calculations and research required, and proper insertion of tables, charts and graphs.

13.9 to >11.9 pts

Meets Expectations

Paper includes a title page, a table of contents, all the calculations and research from previous steps, and instances of incorrect insertion of tables, charts and graphs.

11.9 to >9.9 pts

Below Expectations

Paper may be missing key components required.

9.9 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Paper is missing a title page, a table of contents, calculations and research from previous steps, and/or relevant tables, charts and graphs.

40.0 to >32.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Spreadsheet is professionally organized, ratios are presented in a clear manner and all calculations are performed for the three-year period for each company

32.0 to >25.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Spreadsheet is organized, ratios are presented in a clear manner and all calculations are performed for the three-year period for each company

25.0 to >17.0 pts

Below Expectations

Spreadsheet is not presented well, ratios are not presented in a clear manner and some calculations are performed for the three-year period for each company and some may be calculated incorrectly.

17.0 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Spreadsheet is not presented well, ratios are not presented in a clear manner and calculations are missing or multiple errors.

80.0 to >74.0 pts

Exceeds Expectations

Demonstrate critical thinking in the discussion of ratios in relation to the respective financial diagnostic categories. Compare and contrast the ratios of the two companies. Include forecast of key variables, such as the stock price. Present other information pertinent to the corporations that could affect its future performance and stock price. Make a recommendation regarding the future of this corporation based on calculations and research.

74.0 to >67.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Demonstrate critical thinking in the discussion of ratios in relation to the respective financial diagnostic categories. Compare and contrast the ratios of the two companies. Include forecast of key variables, such as the stock price, or present other information pertinent to the corporations that could affect its future performance and stock price. Make a recommendation regarding the future of this corporation based on calculations and/or research

67.5 to >56.0 pts

Below Expectations

Brief discussion of ratios with some relation to the respective financial diagnostic categories. Compare and contrast some of the ratios of two companies. Does not include forecast of key variables, such as the stock price. Does not present other information pertinent to the corporations that could affect its future performance and stock price. Make a recommendation regarding the future of this corporation. Recommendation is not supported by calculations.

56.0 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Missing or incomplete discussion of ratios with little relation to the respective financial diagnostic categories. Compare and contrast some of the ratios two companies. Does not include forecast of key variables, such as the stock price. Does not present other information pertinent to the corporations that could affect its future performance and stock price. Does not make a recommendation or makes a recommendation regarding the future of this corporation that is not supported by calculations.

25.0 to >21.0 pts

Meets Expectations

Written responses are free of grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates communication. Post follows correct APA style.

21.0 to >17.5 pts

Below Expectations

Written responses include some grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors that distract the reader. Post does not follow correct APA style.

17.5 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations

Written responses contain numerous grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate effective communication. Post does not use APA style.