001359 - Continuity Planning Overview

Points: 75

Assignment 1: Continuity Planning Overview

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Explain the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager.

Insufficiently explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager.

Partially explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager.

Satisfactorily explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager.

Thoroughly explained the basic primary tasks, ongoing evaluations, and major policy and procedural changes that would be needed to perform as the BC lead / manager.

2. Provide insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical. Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical.

Insufficiently provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical.

Partially provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical.

Satisfactorily provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical.

Thoroughly provided insight on how to plan the presentation to garner management and Board buy-in for those who are skeptical.

3. Discuss the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and describe the potential pitfalls of each.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and did not submit or incompletely described the potential pitfalls of each.

Insufficiently discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and insufficiently described the potential pitfalls of each.

Partially discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and partially described the potential pitfalls of each.

Satisfactorily discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and satisfactorily described the potential pitfalls of each.

Thoroughly discussed the first four (4) high-level activities that would be necessary in starting this initiative in the right direction and thoroughly described the potential pitfalls of each.

4. Speculate on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and explain how to overcome that challenge(s).

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and did not submit or incompletely explained how to overcome that challenge(s).

Insufficiently speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and insufficiently explained how to overcome that challenge(s).

Partially speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and partially explained how to overcome that challenge(s).

Satisfactorily speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and satisfactorily explained how to overcome that challenge(s).

Thoroughly speculated on the most comprehensive and / or critical challenge(s) in the infancy of this initiative and thoroughly explained how to overcome that challenge(s).

5. 8 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present

7-8 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present