|
Nursing Reflection Assignment #1
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
|
|
5 pts
Full Credit
Introduces main topic of paper
|
3 pts
Partial Credit
Lacks clarity in introducing topic/paper
|
0 pts
No Credit
Does not introduce the main topic of the paper
|
|
5 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNightingale's Environmental Theory
|
|
10 pts
Full Credit
Describes Nightingale's Environmental Theory
|
6 pts
Partial Credit
Lacks clarity in describing the theory or one area of theory is missing
|
0 pts
No Credit
Does not sufficiently describe Nightingale's Theory
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplains a current (actual or potential) environmental problem faced by patients or communities
|
|
15 pts
Full Credit
Problem is current (within past five years) and is explained in depth. Shows the impact of the environment on the health problem. Describes the political influences, policy issues and legal influences on the problem.
|
8 pts
Partial Credit
Lacks clarity and organization. The problem is explained without adequate depth and the problem is not current. Minimal evidence of how the environment plays a role in the health problem. Does not adequately describe the political influences, policy issues and legal influences on the problem.
|
0 pts
No Credit
Problem is not examined in-depth
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Compares and contrasts another discipline with nursing in examining the problem
|
|
15 pts
Full Credit
In-depth discussion with examples to support ideas. Explains how nursing can make a difference in examining the problem using Nightingale's Environmental Theory and in improving or promoting population health.
|
8 pts
Partial Credit
One area missing or lacks depth. Does not sufficiently explain how nursing can make a difference. Does not include Nightingale's Environmental Theory in the discussion.
|
0 pts
No Credit
Lacks detail or depth
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStakeholders and Resources
|
|
15 pts
Full Credit
Describes what stakeholders are involved in the environmental issue
|
8 pts
Partial Credit
Lacks clarity and depth
|
0 pts
No Credit
Is unclear and/or lacks depth
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOutcomes
|
|
15 pts
Full Credit
Describes a way of measuring success in solving the problem. Gives examples and provides detail.
|
8 pts
Partial Credit
Lacks clarity and method for measuring success. Lacks detail and limited use of examples.
|
0 pts
No Credit
Lacks method for managing success. Lacks detail.
|
|
15 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessional Writing
|
|
10 pts
Full Credit
Paper is at least 3-4 pages in length. Writing is accurate, clear, concise and organized. No spelling, grammatical or sentence structure errors. Provides adequate detail in paper.
|
6 pts
Partial Credit
One to two areas lacking. More than three spelling, grammatical and sentence errors.
|
0 pts
No Credit
Writing is unprofessional. Multiple spelling and grammatical errors.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
|
|
10 pts
Full Credit
Title Page (Using 7th edition of the APA Manual ). Pages are numbered in upper right corner of each page. Times New Roman, 12 point type, double spacing with appropriate margins, paragraphs, indents. Headings and subheadings are used throughout the paper. References are current (in the last five years) and cited appropriately. Uses at least three professional references cited in APA format.
|
6 pts
Partial Credit
One to three areas lack APA formatting
|
0 pts
No Credit
References or citations are missing. More than three errors in APA formatting.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
|
|
5 pts
Full Credit
Effectively summarizes the main points of the paper
|
3 pts
Partial Credit
Lacks clarity in concluding the main points of the paper
|
0 pts
No Credit
No conclusion
|
|
5 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100
|
nikkyvu
rubic.docx
