Option #2: Analyzing a Presentation

profileTROWELL1911
rubic.docx

ORG536 Mod 4 CT

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

25 to >20.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20 to >15.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

15 to >10.0 pts

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

10 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Sources or examples don't meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course are clearly deficient.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

10 to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than one significant error.

8 to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6 to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with four to five significant errors.

4 to >0 pts

Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global resources on APA citation style, with more than five significant errors.

10 pts

Total Points: 75

RG536 Mod 4 CT