15.0
Analysis proficiently summarizes Janet’s progress monitoring data.
Analysis
20.0
Analysis insightfully and professionally explains whether Janet is responding adequately to Tier 2 instruction, citing appropriate student data.
Team Member Evaluation
Analysis substantially explains support team members disagreement about what tier of instruction would best meet Janet’s needs. A thorough rationale is provided, citing appropriate student data.
Tier Recommendation and Explanation
20.0
Analysis definitively recommends a tier of instruction for Janet. for Janet. A convincing explanation is provided, citing appropriate data.
Argument Logic and Construction
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Organization
5.0
The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit and the audience is provided with a clear sense of the main idea.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Prof. Kim
Rub2.docx
0
