DC Tutor

100.00 %

Criteria

Part 1: Journal Article Review Summaries, Common Argument, and Future Professional Practice

30.0

Each journal article review comprehensively summarizes how the article supports a philosophy of inclusion, convincingly counters a common claim not in favor of inclusion using the article, and insightfully explains application to future professional practice.

Part 2: Philosophy of Inclusion

20.0

Philosophy of inclusion provides compelling support of inclusion, insightfully promoting the well-being of students with disabilities by expertly describing how to create a safe, inclusive, and positive environment. Description is substantially supported by article reviews.

Part 3: Communicating Your Philosophy

30.0

Skillful description of how to professionally communicate personal philosophy of inclusion to a school leader to build positivity toward inclusion and promote the well-being of students with disabilities is provided. Includes how to thoroughly persuade a colleague who does not believe in inclusion. Description is well supported by presented research.

Organization

5.0

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5.0

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

Template Format

5.0

Content is well-presented and easy to read. All template and format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5.0

Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Total Percentage

100