|
5
Target
100.00%
|
|
100.0 %Criteria
|
|
|
20.0 % Case Arguments
|
|
|
|
|
Each summary professionally details key arguments for each side of a case specific to assessment, eligibility, and/or placement with a continuum of services.
|
|
|
15.0 % Case Supporting Evidence
|
|
|
|
|
Each summary skillfully details relevant supporting evidence for each side of the case presented.
|
|
|
15.0 % Case Ruling
|
|
|
|
|
Each summary proficiently details the ruling of the case, clearly including the laws used to support the ruling.
|
|
|
25.0 % Decision Position
|
|
|
|
|
Each summary specifies an insightful personal position regarding the case decision. Justification for position is relevant and concisely supported with compelling details from the case.
|
|
|
5.0 % Overall Presentation
|
|
|
|
|
The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Work would be highly desirable for public dissemination.
|
|
|
10.0 % Research Citations and Format
|
|
|
|
|
All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.
|
|
|
10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
|
|
|
|
Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language.
|
|
|
100 % Total Weightage
|
|
|