online test chapters

profileahlam6248
rsh_qam11_ch05.ppt

Chapter 5

To accompany
Quantitative Analysis for Management, Eleventh Edition, by Render, Stair, and Hanna

Power Point slides created by Brian Peterson

Forecasting

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

*

Learning Objectives

Understand and know when to use various families of forecasting models.

Compare moving averages, exponential smoothing, and other time-series models.

Seasonally adjust data.

Understand Delphi and other qualitative decision-making approaches.

Compute a variety of error measures.

After completing this chapter, students will be able to:

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Chapter Outline

5.1 Introduction

5.2 Types of Forecasts

5.3 Scatter Diagrams and Time Series

5.4 Measures of Forecast Accuracy

5.5 Time-Series Forecasting Models

5.6 Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Introduction

  • Managers are always trying to reduce uncertainty and make better estimates of what will happen in the future.
  • This is the main purpose of forecasting.
  • Some firms use subjective methods: seat-of-the pants methods, intuition, experience.
  • There are also several quantitative techniques, including:
  • Moving averages
  • Exponential smoothing
  • Trend projections
  • Least squares regression analysis

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Introduction

  • Eight steps to forecasting:

Determine the use of the forecast—what objective are we trying to obtain?

Select the items or quantities that are to be forecasted.

Determine the time horizon of the forecast.

Select the forecasting model or models.

Gather the data needed to make the forecast.

Validate the forecasting model.

Make the forecast.

Implement the results.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Introduction

  • These steps are a systematic way of initiating, designing, and implementing a forecasting system.
  • When used regularly over time, data is collected routinely and calculations performed automatically.
  • There is seldom one superior forecasting system.
  • Different organizations may use different techniques.
  • Whatever tool works best for a firm is the one that should be used.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Forecasting Models

Forecasting Techniques

Figure 5.1

Regression Analysis

Multiple

Regression

Moving

Average

Exponential Smoothing

Trend

Projections

Decomposition

Delphi

Methods

Jury of Executive

Opinion

Sales Force

Composite

Consumer

Market Survey

Time-Series Methods

Qualitative

Models

Causal

Methods

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Qualitative Models

Qualitative models incorporate judgmental or subjective factors.

These are useful when subjective factors are thought to be important or when accurate quantitative data is difficult to obtain.

Common qualitative techniques are:

Delphi method.

Jury of executive opinion.

Sales force composite.

Consumer market surveys.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Qualitative Models

  • Delphi Method – This is an iterative group process where (possibly geographically dispersed) respondents provide input to decision makers.
  • Jury of Executive Opinion – This method collects opinions of a small group of high-level managers, possibly using statistical models for analysis.
  • Sales Force Composite – This allows individual salespersons estimate the sales in their region and the data is compiled at a district or national level.
  • Consumer Market Survey – Input is solicited from customers or potential customers regarding their purchasing plans.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Time-Series Models

  • Time-series models attempt to predict the future based on the past.
  • Common time-series models are:
  • Moving average.
  • Exponential smoothing.
  • Trend projections.
  • Decomposition.
  • Regression analysis is used in trend projections and one type of decomposition model.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Causal Models

  • Causal models use variables or factors that might influence the quantity being forecasted.
  • The objective is to build a model with the best statistical relationship between the variable being forecast and the independent variables.
  • Regression analysis is the most common technique used in causal modeling.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Scatter Diagrams

Wacker Distributors wants to forecast sales for three different products (annual sales in the table, in units):

Table 5.1

YEAR TELEVISION SETS RADIOS COMPACT DISC PLAYERS
1 250 300 110
2 250 310 100
3 250 320 120
4 250 330 140
5 250 340 170
6 250 350 150
7 250 360 160
8 250 370 190
9 250 380 200
10 250 390 190

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Scatter Diagram for TVs

Figure 5.2a

  • Sales appear to be constant over time

Sales = 250

  • A good estimate of sales in year 11 is 250 televisions

330 –

250 –

200 –

150 –

100 –

50 –

| | | | | | | | | |

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time (Years)

Annual Sales of Televisions

(a)

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Scatter Diagram for Radios

  • Sales appear to be increasing at a constant rate of 10 radios per year

Sales = 290 + 10(Year)

  • A reasonable estimate of sales in year 11 is 400 radios.

Figure 5.2b

420 –

400 –

380 –

360 –

340 –

320 –

300 –

280 –

| | | | | | | | | |

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time (Years)

Annual Sales of Radios

(b)

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Scatter Diagram for CD Players

  • This trend line may not be perfectly accurate because of variation from year to year
  • Sales appear to be increasing
  • A forecast would probably be a larger figure each year

Figure 5.2c

200 –

180 –

160 –

140 –

120 –

100 –

| | | | | | | | | |

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time (Years)

Annual Sales of CD Players

(c)

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Measures of Forecast Accuracy

  • We compare forecasted values with actual values to see how well one model works or to compare models.

Forecast error = Actual value – Forecast value

  • One measure of accuracy is the mean absolute deviation (MAD):

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Measures of Forecast Accuracy

Using a naïve forecasting model we can compute the MAD:

Table 5.2

YEAR ACTUAL SALES OF CD PLAYERS FORECAST SALES ABSOLUTE VALUE OF ERRORS (DEVIATION), (ACTUAL – FORECAST)
1 110
2 100 110 |100 – 110| = 10
3 120 100 |120 – 110| = 20
4 140 120 |140 – 120| = 20
5 170 140 |170 – 140| = 30
6 150 170 |150 – 170| = 20
7 160 150 |160 – 150| = 10
8 190 160 |190 – 160| = 30
9 200 190 |200 – 190| = 10
10 190 200 |190 – 200| = 10
11 190
Sum of |errors| = 160
MAD = 160/9 = 17.8

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Measures of Forecast Accuracy

Table 5.2

Using a naïve forecasting model we can compute the MAD:

YEAR ACTUAL SALES OF CD PLAYERS FORECAST SALES ABSOLUTE VALUE OF ERRORS (DEVIATION), (ACTUAL – FORECAST)
1 110
2 100 110 |100 – 110| = 10
3 120 100 |120 – 110| = 20
4 140 120 |140 – 120| = 20
5 170 140 |170 – 140| = 30
6 150 170 |150 – 170| = 20
7 160 150 |160 – 150| = 10
8 190 160 |190 – 160| = 30
9 200 190 |200 – 190| = 10
10 190 200 |190 – 200| = 10
11 190
Sum of |errors| = 160
MAD = 160/9 = 17.8

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Measures of Forecast Accuracy

  • There are other popular measures of forecast accuracy.
  • The mean squared error:
  • The mean absolute percent error:
  • And bias is the average error.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Time-Series Forecasting Models

  • A time series is a sequence of evenly spaced events.
  • Time-series forecasts predict the future based solely on the past values of the variable, and other variables are ignored.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Components of a Time-Series

A time series typically has four components:

Trend (T) is the gradual upward or downward movement of the data over time.

Seasonality (S) is a pattern of demand fluctuations above or below the trend line that repeats at regular intervals.

Cycles (C) are patterns in annual data that occur every several years.

Random variations (R) are “blips” in the data caused by chance or unusual situations, and follow no discernible pattern.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Decomposition of a Time-Series

Average Demand over 4 Years

Trend Component

Actual Demand Line

Figure 5.3

Product Demand Charted over 4 Years, with Trend and Seasonality Indicated

Time

Demand for Product or Service

| | | |

Year Year Year Year

1 2 3 4

Seasonal Peaks

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Decomposition of a Time-Series

  • There are two general forms of time-series models:
  • The multiplicative model:

Demand = T x S x C x R

  • The additive model:

Demand = T + S + C + R

  • Models may be combinations of these two forms.
  • Forecasters often assume errors are normally distributed with a mean of zero.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Moving Averages

  • Moving averages can be used when demand is relatively steady over time.
  • The next forecast is the average of the most recent n data values from the time series.
  • This methods tends to smooth out short-term irregularities in the data series.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Moving Averages

  • Mathematically:

Where:

= forecast for time period t + 1

= actual value in time period t

n = number of periods to average

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Wallace Garden Supply

  • Wallace Garden Supply wants to forecast demand for its Storage Shed.
  • They have collected data for the past year.
  • They are using a three-month moving average to forecast demand (n = 3).

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Wallace Garden Supply

Table 5.3

MONTH ACTUAL SHED SALES THREE-MONTH MOVING AVERAGE
January 10
February 12
March 13
April 16
May 19
June 23
July 26
August 30
September 28
October 18
November 16
December 14
January

(12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13.67

(13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16.00

(16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19.33

(19 + 23 + 26)/3 = 22.67

(23 + 26 + 30)/3 = 26.33

(26 + 30 + 28)/3 = 28.00

(30 + 28 + 18)/3 = 25.33

(28 + 18 + 16)/3 = 20.67

(18 + 16 + 14)/3 = 16.00

(10 + 12 + 13)/3 = 11.67

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Weighted Moving Averages

  • Weighted moving averages use weights to put more emphasis on previous periods.
  • This is often used when a trend or other pattern is emerging.
  • Mathematically:

where

wi = weight for the ith observation

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Wallace Garden Supply

  • Wallace Garden Supply decides to try a weighted moving average model to forecast demand for its Storage Shed.
  • They decide on the following weighting scheme:

3 x Sales last month + 2 x Sales two months ago + 1 X Sales three months ago

WEIGHTS APPLIED PERIOD
3 Last month
2 Two months ago
1 Three months ago
6

Sum of the weights

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Wallace Garden Supply

Table 5.4

MONTH ACTUAL SHED SALES THREE-MONTH WEIGHTED MOVING AVERAGE
January 10
February 12
March 13
April 16
May 19
June 23
July 26
August 30
September 28
October 18
November 16
December 14
January

[(3 X 13) + (2 X 12) + (10)]/6 = 12.17

[(3 X 16) + (2 X 13) + (12)]/6 = 14.33

[(3 X 19) + (2 X 16) + (13)]/6 = 17.00

[(3 X 23) + (2 X 19) + (16)]/6 = 20.50

[(3 X 26) + (2 X 23) + (19)]/6 = 23.83

[(3 X 30) + (2 X 26) + (23)]/6 = 27.50

[(3 X 28) + (2 X 30) + (26)]/6 = 28.33

[(3 X 18) + (2 X 28) + (30)]/6 = 23.33

[(3 X 16) + (2 X 18) + (28)]/6 = 18.67

[(3 X 14) + (2 X 16) + (18)]/6 = 15.33

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Wallace Garden Supply

Program 5.1A

Selecting the Forecasting Module in Excel QM

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Wallace Garden Supply

Program 5.1B

Initialization Screen for Weighted Moving Average

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Wallace Garden Supply

Program 5.1C

Weighted Moving Average in Excel QM for Wallace Garden Supply

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Exponential Smoothing

  • Exponential smoothing is a type of moving average that is easy to use and requires little record keeping of data.

New forecast = Last period’s forecast

+ (Last period’s actual demand

– Last period’s forecast)

Here  is a weight (or smoothing constant) in which 0≤≤1.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Exponential Smoothing

Mathematically:

Where:

Ft+1 = new forecast (for time period t + 1)

Ft = pervious forecast (for time period t)

 = smoothing constant (0 ≤  ≤ 1)

Yt = pervious period’s actual demand

The idea is simple – the new estimate is the old estimate plus some fraction of the error in the last period.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Exponential Smoothing Example

  • In January, February’s demand for a certain car model was predicted to be 142.
  • Actual February demand was 153 autos
  • Using a smoothing constant of  = 0.20, what is the forecast for March?

New forecast (for March demand) = 142 + 0.2(153 – 142)

= 144.2 or 144 autos

  • If actual demand in March was 136 autos, the April forecast would be:

New forecast (for April demand) = 144.2 + 0.2(136 – 144.2)

= 142.6 or 143 autos

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Selecting the Smoothing Constant

  • Selecting the appropriate value for  is key to obtaining a good forecast.
  • The objective is always to generate an accurate forecast.
  • The general approach is to develop trial forecasts with different values of  and select the  that results in the lowest MAD.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Exponential Smoothing

Table 5.5

Port of Baltimore Exponential Smoothing Forecast for =0.1 and =0.5.

QUARTER ACTUAL TONNAGE UNLOADED FORECAST USING  =0.10 FORECAST USING  =0.50
1 180 175 175
2 168 175.5 = 175.00 + 0.10(180 – 175) 177.5
3 159 174.75 = 175.50 + 0.10(168 – 175.50) 172.75
4 175 173.18 = 174.75 + 0.10(159 – 174.75) 165.88
5 190 173.36 = 173.18 + 0.10(175 – 173.18) 170.44
6 205 175.02 = 173.36 + 0.10(190 – 173.36) 180.22
7 180 178.02 = 175.02 + 0.10(205 – 175.02) 192.61
8 182 178.22 = 178.02 + 0.10(180 – 178.02) 186.30
9 ? 178.60 = 178.22 + 0.10(182 – 178.22) 184.15

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Exponential Smoothing

Table 5.6

Absolute Deviations and MADs for the Port of Baltimore Example

QUARTER ACTUAL TONNAGE UNLOADED FORECAST WITH  = 0.10 ABSOLUTE DEVIATIONS FOR  = 0.10 FORECAST WITH  = 0.50 ABSOLUTE DEVIATIONS FOR  = 0.50
1 180 175 5….. 175 5….
2 168 175.5 7.5.. 177.5 9.5..
3 159 174.75 15.75 172.75 13.75
4 175 173.18 1.82 165.88 9.12
5 190 173.36 16.64 170.44 19.56
6 205 175.02 29.98 180.22 24.78
7 180 178.02 1.98 192.61 12.61
8 182 178.22 3.78 186.30 4.3..
Sum of absolute deviations 82.45 98.63
MAD = Σ|deviations| = 10.31 MAD = 12.33
n

Best choice

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Port of Baltimore Exponential Smoothing Example in Excel QM

Program 5.2

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Annie Puciloski (AP) - upper callout, 2nd line: insert this initial forecast, "delete" cells E10:H10

Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment

  • Like all averaging techniques, exponential smoothing does not respond to trends.
  • A more complex model can be used that adjusts for trends.
  • The basic approach is to develop an exponential smoothing forecast, and then adjust it for the trend.

Forecast including trend (FITt+1) = Smoothed forecast (Ft+1)

+ Smoothed Trend (Tt+1)

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Exponential Smoothing with Trend Adjustment

  • The equation for the trend correction uses a new smoothing constant  .
  • Tt must be given or estimated. Tt+1 is computed by:

where

Tt = smoothed trend for time period t

Ft = smoothed forecast for time period t

FITt = forecast including trend for time period t

α =smoothing constant for forecasts

 = smoothing constant for trend

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Selecting a Smoothing Constant

  • As with exponential smoothing, a high value of  makes the forecast more responsive to changes in trend.
  • A low value of  gives less weight to the recent trend and tends to smooth out the trend.
  • Values are generally selected using a trial-and-error approach based on the value of the MAD for different values of .

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing

  • Midwest Manufacturing has a demand for electrical generators from 2004 – 2010 as given in the table below.
  • To forecast demand, Midwest assumes:
  • F1 is perfect.
  • T1 = 0.
  • α = 0.3
  • β = 0.4.

Table 5.7

YEAR ELECTRICAL GENERATORS SOLD
2004 74
2005 79
2006 80
2007 90
2008 105
2009 142
2010 122

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing

  • According to the assumptions,

FIT1 = F1 + T1 = 74 + 0 = 74.

  • Step 1: Compute Ft+1 by:

FITt+1 = Ft + α(Yt – FITt)

= 74 + 0.3(74-74) = 74

  • Step 2: Update the trend using:

Tt+1 = Tt + β(Ft+1 – FITt)

T2 = T1 + .4(F2 – FIT1)

= 0 + .4(74 – 74) = 0

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing

  • Step 3: Calculate the trend-adjusted exponential smoothing forecast (Ft+1) using the following:

FIT2 = F2 + T2

= 74 + 0 = 74

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Annie Puciloski (AP) - 2nd line: F s/b FIT sub t+1

Midwestern Manufacturing

  • For 2006 (period 3) we have:
  • Step 1: F3 = FIT2 + 0.3(Y2 – FIT2)

= 74 + .3(79 – 74)

= 75.5

  • Step 2: T3 = T2 + 0.4(F3 – FIT2)

= 0 + 0.4(75.5 – 74)

= 0.6

  • Step 3: FIT3 = F3 + T3

= 75.5 + 0.6

= 76.1

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing Exponential Smoothing with Trend Forecasts

Table 5.8

Time (t) Demand (Yt) FITt+1 = Ft + 0.3(Yt– FITt) Tt+1 = Tt + 0.4(Ft+1 – FITt) FITt+1 = Ft+1 + Tt+1
1 74 74 0 74
2 79 74=74+0.3(74-74) 0 = 0+0.4(74-74) 74 = 74+0
3 80 75.5=74+0.3(79-74) 0.6 = 0+0.4(75.5-74) 76.1 = 75.5+0.6
4 90 77.270=76.1+0.3(80-76.1) 1.068 = 0.6+0.4(77.27-76.1) 78.338 = 77.270+1.068
5 105 81.837=78.338+0.3(90-78.338) 2.468 = 1.068+0.4(81.837-78.338) 84.305 = 81.837+2.468
6 142 90.514=84.305+0.3(105-84.305) 4.952 = 2.468+0.4(90.514-84.305) 95.466 = 90.514+4.952
7 122 109.426=95.466+0.3(142-95.466) 10.536 = 4.952+0.4(109.426-95.466) 119.962 = 109.426+10.536
8 120.573=119.962+0.3(122-119.962) 10.780 = 10.536+0.4(120.573-119.962) 131.353 = 120.573+10.780

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing

Program 5.3

Midwestern Manufacturing Trend-Adjusted Exponential Smoothing in Excel QM

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Trend Projections

  • Trend projection fits a trend line to a series of historical data points.
  • The line is projected into the future for medium- to long-range forecasts.
  • Several trend equations can be developed based on exponential or quadratic models.
  • The simplest is a linear model developed using regression analysis.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Trend Projection

The mathematical form is

Where

= predicted value

b0 = intercept

b1 = slope of the line

X = time period (i.e., X = 1, 2, 3, …, n)

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing

Program 5.4A

Excel Input Screen for Midwestern Manufacturing Trend Line

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing

Program 5.4B

Excel Output for Midwestern Manufacturing Trend Line

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing Company Example

  • The forecast equation is
  • To project demand for 2011, we use the coding system to define X = 8

(sales in 2011) = 56.71 + 10.54(8)

= 141.03, or 141 generators

  • Likewise for X = 9

(sales in 2012) = 56.71 + 10.54(9)

= 151.57, or 152 generators

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing

Figure 5.4

Electrical Generators and the Computed Trend Line

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Midwestern Manufacturing

Program 5.5

Excel QM Trend Projection Model

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Seasonal Variations

  • Recurring variations over time may indicate the need for seasonal adjustments in the trend line.
  • A seasonal index indicates how a particular season compares with an average season.
  • When no trend is present, the seasonal index can be found by dividing the average value for a particular season by the average of all the data.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Eichler Supplies

  • Eichler Supplies sells telephone answering machines.
  • Sales data for the past two years has been collected for one particular model.
  • The firm wants to create a forecast that includes seasonality.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Eichler Supplies Answering Machine Sales and Seasonal Indices

Table 5.9

MONTH SALES DEMAND AVERAGE TWO- YEAR DEMAND MONTHLY DEMAND AVERAGE SEASONAL INDEX
YEAR 1 YEAR 2
January 80 100 90 94 0.957
February 85 75 80 94 0.851
March 80 90 85 94 0.904
April 110 90 100 94 1.064
May 115 131 123 94 1.309
June 120 110 115 94 1.223
July 100 110 105 94 1.117
August 110 90 100 94 1.064
September 85 95 90 94 0.957
October 75 85 80 94 0.851
November 85 75 80 94 0.851
December 80 80 80 94 0.851
Total average demand = 1,128

Average two-year demand

Average monthly demand

Seasonal index =

1,128

12 months

Average monthly demand = = 94

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Seasonal Variations

  • The calculations for the seasonal indices are

Jan.

July

Feb.

Aug.

Mar.

Sept.

Apr.

Oct.

May

Nov.

June

Dec.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Seasonal Variations with Trend

  • When both trend and seasonal components are present, the forecasting task is more complex.
  • Seasonal indices should be computed using a centered moving average (CMA) approach.
  • There are four steps in computing CMAs:

Compute the CMA for each observation (where possible).

Compute the seasonal ratio = Observation/CMA for that observation.

Average seasonal ratios to get seasonal indices.

If seasonal indices do not add to the number of seasons, multiply each index by (Number of seasons)/(Sum of indices).

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Turner Industries

  • The following table shows Turner Industries’ quarterly sales figures for the past three years, in millions of dollars:

Table 5.10

QUARTER YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 AVERAGE
1 108 116 123 115.67
2 125 134 142 133.67
3 150 159 168 159.00
4 141 152 165 152.67
Average 131.00 140.25 149.50 140.25

Definite trend

Seasonal pattern

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Turner Industries

  • To calculate the CMA for quarter 3 of year 1 we compare the actual sales with an average quarter centered on that time period.
  • We will use 1.5 quarters before quarter 3 and 1.5 quarters after quarter 3 – that is we take quarters 2, 3, and 4 and one half of quarters 1, year 1 and quarter 1, year 2.

0.5(108) + 125 + 150 + 141 + 0.5(116)

4

CMA(q3, y1) = = 132.00

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Turner Industries

Compare the actual sales in quarter 3 to the CMA to find the seasonal ratio:

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Turner Industries

Table 5.11

YEAR QUARTER SALES CMA SEASONAL RATIO
1 1 108
2 125
3 150 132.000 1.136
4 141 134.125 1.051
2 1 116 136.375 0.851
2 134 138.875 0.965
3 159 141.125 1.127
4 152 143.000 1.063
3 1 123 145.125 0.848
2 142 147.875 0.960
3 168
4 165

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Turner Industries

There are two seasonal ratios for each quarter so these are averaged to get the seasonal index:

Index for quarter 1 = I1 = (0.851 + 0.848)/2 = 0.85

Index for quarter 2 = I2 = (0.965 + 0.960)/2 = 0.96

Index for quarter 3 = I3 = (1.136 + 1.127)/2 = 1.13

Index for quarter 4 = I4 = (1.051 + 1.063)/2 = 1.06

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Turner Industries

Scatterplot of Turner Industries Sales Data and Centered Moving Average

Figure 5.5

CMA

Original Sales Figures

200 –

150 –

100 –

50 –

0 –

Sales

| | | | | | | | | | | |

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Time Period

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

The Decomposition Method of Forecasting with Trend and Seasonal Components

  • Decomposition is the process of isolating linear trend and seasonal factors to develop more accurate forecasts.
  • There are five steps to decomposition:

Compute seasonal indices using CMAs.

Deseasonalize the data by dividing each number by its seasonal index.

Find the equation of a trend line using the deseasonalized data.

Forecast for future periods using the trend line.

Multiply the trend line forecast by the appropriate seasonal index.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Deseasonalized Data for Turner Industries

  • Develop a forecast using this trend and multiply the forecast by the appropriate seasonal index.
  • Find a trend line using the deseasonalized data:

b1 = 2.34 b0 = 124.78

= 124.78 + 2.34X

= 124.78 + 2.34(13)

= 155.2 (forecast before adjustment for seasonality)

x I1 = 155.2 x 0.85 = 131.92

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Deseasonalized Data for Turner Industries

Table 5.12

SALES ($1,000,000s) SEASONAL INDEX DESEASONALIZED SALES ($1,000,000s)
108 0.85 127.059
125 0.96 130.208
150 1.13 132.743
141 1.06 133.019
116 0.85 136.471
134 0.96 139.583
159 1.13 140.708
152 1.06 143.396
123 0.85 144.706
142 0.96 147.917
168 1.13 148.673
165 1.06 155.660

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

San Diego Hospital

A San Diego hospital used 66 months of adult inpatient days to develop the following seasonal indices.

Table 5.13

MONTH SEASONALITY INDEX MONTH SEASONALITY INDEX
January 1.0436 July 1.0302
February 0.9669 August 1.0405
March 1.0203 September 0.9653
April 1.0087 October 1.0048
May 0.9935 November 0.9598
June 0.9906 December 0.9805

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

San Diego Hospital

Based on this model, the forecast for patient days for the next period (67) is:

Patient days = 8,091 + (21.5)(67) = 9,532 (trend only)

Patient days = (9,532)(1.0436)

= 9,948 (trend and seasonal)

= 8,091 + 21.5X

= forecast patient days

X = time in months

where

Using this data they developed the following equation:

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

San Diego Hospital

Program 5.6A

Initialization Screen for the Decomposition method in Excel QM

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

San Diego Hospital

Program 5.6B

Turner Industries Forecast Using the Decomposition Method in Excel QM

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Using Regression with Trend and Seasonal Components

  • Multiple regression can be used to forecast both trend and seasonal components in a time series.
  • One independent variable is time.
  • Dummy independent variables are used to represent the seasons.
  • The model is an additive decomposition model:

where

X1 = time period

X2 = 1 if quarter 2, 0 otherwise

X3 = 1 if quarter 3, 0 otherwise

X4 = 1 if quarter 4, 0 otherwise

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Regression with Trend and Seasonal Components

Program 5.7A

Excel Input for the Turner Industries Example Using Multiple Regression

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Using Regression with Trend and Seasonal Components

Program 5.7B

Excel Output for the Turner Industries Example Using Multiple Regression

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Using Regression with Trend and Seasonal Components

  • The resulting regression equation is:
  • Using the model to forecast sales for the first two quarters of next year:
  • These are different from the results obtained using the multiplicative decomposition method.
  • Use MAD or MSE to determine the best model.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts

  • Tracking signals can be used to monitor the performance of a forecast.
  • A tracking signal is computed as the running sum of the forecast errors (RSFE), and is computed using the following equation:

where

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts

Figure 5.6

Plot of Tracking Signals

Acceptable Range

Signal Tripped

Upper Control Limit

Lower Control Limit

0 MADs

+

Time

Tracking Signal

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Monitoring and Controlling Forecasts

  • Positive tracking signals indicate demand is greater than forecast.
  • Negative tracking signals indicate demand is less than forecast.
  • Some variation is expected, but a good forecast will have about as much positive error as negative error.
  • Problems are indicated when the signal trips either the upper or lower predetermined limits.
  • This indicates there has been an unacceptable amount of variation.
  • Limits should be reasonable and may vary from item to item.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Kimball’s Bakery

Quarterly sales of croissants (in thousands):

TIME PERIOD FORECAST DEMAND ACTUAL DEMAND ERROR RSFE |FORECAST | | ERROR | CUMULATIVE ERROR MAD TRACKING SIGNAL
1 100 90 –10 –10 10 10 10.0 –1
2 100 95 –5 –15 5 15 7.5 –2
3 100 115 +15 0 15 30 10.0 0
4 110 100 –10 –10 10 40 10.0 –1
5 110 125 +15 +5 15 55 11.0 +0.5
6 110 140 +30 +35 35 85 14.2 +2.5

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Adaptive Smoothing

  • Adaptive smoothing is the computer monitoring of tracking signals and self-adjustment if a limit is tripped.
  • In exponential smoothing, the values of  and  are adjusted when the computer detects an excessive amount of variation.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

Copyright

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.

Copyright ©2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

n

å

=

error

forecast

MAD

8

17

9

160

error

forecast

.

MAD

=

=

=

å

n

n

å

=

2

error

)

(

MSE

%

MAPE

100

actual

error

n

å

=

n

n

periods

previous

in

demands

of

Sum

forecast

average

Moving

=

n

Y

Y

Y

F

n

t

t

t

t

1

1

1

+

-

-

+

+

+

+

=

...

t

Y

1

+

t

F

å

å

=

+

)

(

)

)(

(

Weights

period

in

value

Actual

period

in

Weight

1

i

F

t

n

n

t

n

t

t

t

w

w

w

Y

w

Y

w

Y

w

F

+

+

+

+

+

+

=

+

-

-

+

...

...

2

1

1

1

2

1

1

)

(

t

t

t

t

F

Y

F

F

-

+

=

+

a

1

)

(

)

1

(

1

1

t

t

t

t

FIT

F

T

T

-

+

-

=

+

+

b

b

X

b

b

Y

1

0

+

=

ˆ

Y

ˆ

X

Y

54

10

71

56

.

.

ˆ

+

=

122

223

1

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

85

851

0

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

131

309

1

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

106

064

1

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

90

904

0

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

96

957

0

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

85

851

0

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

106

064

1

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

96

957

0

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

112

117

1

12

200

1

=

´

.

,

136

1

132

150

3

quarter

in

Sales

ratio

Seasonal

.

CMA

=

=

=

Y

ˆ

Y

ˆ

4

4

3

3

2

2

1

1

X

b

X

b

X

b

X

b

a

Y

+

+

+

+

=

ˆ

4

3

2

1

1

30

7

38

7

15

3

2

1

104

X

X

X

X

Y

.

.

.

.

.

ˆ

+

+

+

+

=

134

0

1

30

0

7

38

0

7

15

13

3

2

1

104

=

+

+

+

+

=

)

(

.

)

(

.

)

(

.

)

(

.

.

ˆ

Y

152

0

1

30

0

7

38

1

7

15

14

3

2

1

104

=

+

+

+

+

=

)

(

.

)

(

.

)

(

.

)

(

.

.

ˆ

Y

MAD

RSFE

=

signal

Tracking

n

å

=

error

forecast

MAD

2

14

6

85

error

forecast

.

MAD

=

=

=

å

n

MADs

5

.

2

2

.

14

35

signal

Tracking

=

=

=

MAD

RSFE