Essay English 101 - Research Project - Annotated Bibliography

Last Name 1

Works Cited

Author(s). “Title of Journal Article.” Title of Professional Journal, vol. #, no. #, Year, pp. #-#. Name of Database, URL/ROI address.

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In three to five sentences, discuss a brief summary and an evaluation of the work. In the evaluation, you should evaluate the source’s role and usefulness in your project, and assess the source’s strengths and limitations. Then discuss what makes the author a credible source. Discuss his/her qualifications and expertise. Finally, discuss the publisher or the sponsor reliability. Ultimately you are trying to evaluate the reliability of the source and its author.

Last Name, First Name. Title of a Book with One Author, Publisher, Publication date.

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In three to five sentences, discuss a brief summary and an evaluation of the work. In the evaluation, you should evaluate the source’s role and usefulness in your project, and assess the source’s strengths and limitations. Then discuss what makes the author a credible source. Discuss his/her qualifications and expertise. Finally, discuss the publisher or the sponsor reliability. Ultimately you are trying to evaluate the reliability of the source and its author.

Last Name, First Name and First Name Last Name. Title of Book, 2nd ed, Publisher, Publication date.

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In three to five sentences, discuss a brief summary and an evaluation of the work. In the evaluation, you should evaluate the source’s role and usefulness in your project, and assess the source’s strengths and limitations. Then discuss what makes the author a credible source. Discuss his/her qualifications and expertise. Finally, discuss the publisher or the sponsor reliability. Ultimately you are trying to evaluate the reliability of the source and its author.

Last name, First name of 1st author. et al. Title, Publisher, Date of publication.

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In three to five sentences, discuss a brief summary and an evaluation of the work. In the evaluation, you should evaluate the source’s role and usefulness in your project, and assess the source’s strengths and limitations. Then discuss what makes the author a credible source. Discuss his/her qualifications and expertise. Finally, discuss the publisher or the sponsor reliability. Ultimately you are trying to evaluate the reliability of the source and its author.

Author(s). “Title of Essay/Chapter” Title of Collection, edited by Editor’s Name(s), Publisher, Year. pp. 36-94 (range of pages).

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In three to five sentences, discuss a brief summary and an evaluation of the work. In the evaluation, you should evaluate the source’s role and usefulness in your project, and assess the source’s strengths and limitations. Then discuss what makes the author a credible source. Discuss his/her qualifications and expertise. Finally, discuss the publisher or the sponsor reliability. Ultimately you are trying to evaluate the reliability of the source and its author.

“Title of Newspaper or Magazine Article With No Author Listed.” Title of Magazine or Newspaper, Day Month Year, page numbers.

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In three to five sentences, discuss a brief summary and an evaluation of the work. In the evaluation, you should evaluate the source’s role and usefulness in your project, and assess the source’s strengths and limitations. Then discuss what makes the author a credible source. Discuss his/her qualifications and expertise. Finally, discuss the publisher or the sponsor reliability. Ultimately you are trying to evaluate the reliability of the source and its author.

Author(s). “Name of Web Page.” Website Title. Name of institution/organization affiliated with the site (if any), URL. Accessed DD Mmm. YYYY.

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In three to five sentences, discuss a brief summary and an evaluation of the work. In the evaluation, you should evaluate the source’s role and usefulness in your project, and assess the source’s strengths and limitations. Then discuss what makes the author a credible source. Discuss his/her qualifications and expertise. Finally, discuss the publisher or the sponsor reliability. Ultimately you are trying to evaluate the reliability of the source and its author.

Author’s Name. “Title of Image or Video.” YouTube, uploaded by poster’s username, date of posting. URL. Accessed DD Mmm. YYYY.

Highlight this passage and replace it with your annotation. In three to five sentences, discuss a brief summary and an evaluation of the work. In the evaluation, you should evaluate the source’s role and usefulness in your project, and assess the source’s strengths and limitations. Then discuss what makes the author a credible source. Discuss his/her qualifications and expertise. Finally, discuss the publisher or the sponsor reliability. Ultimately you are trying to evaluate the reliability of the source and its author.