Root Cause Analysis

profileebonydovy
RootCauseAnalysis-Part31.html.zip

Root Cause Analysis - Part 31.html

banner

Part 3:  Final Paper

Part 3 of this assignment is the the final product:  the scholarly paper.  You have identified a problem that relates to nursing practice, patient care, or the healthcare environment. You have studied the problem, searched the relevant literature, and now you will prepare a scholarly paper that incorporates several course concepts and demonstrates your ability to analyze a situation from multiple perspectives and multiple levels. 

The RCA process is designed to answer three questions:

  1. What happened?
  2. Why did it happen?
  3. What can be done to prevent it in the future?

The structure of the final paper is designed so that you answer these questions.

Resources

Review the resources from Part 1 and Part 2.

A cause-and-effect (fishbone) diagram illustrating the root cause analysis is required for the final paper, and must be properly formatted and embedded in the paper following APA guidelines. Use this template for the root cause analysis and incorporate it, properly formatted, into the final paper.

Full instructions for Part 3: 

The following exemplars are provided to guide you in preparing your final paper. They are not to be copied or redistributed in any way, nor are they to be used as source material.

Examples of Student Root Cause Analysis Papers:

Expectations

  1. Submit the Part 3: Final paper to Tutor.com before uploading to the assignment folder in D2L.
  2. Allow time to receive the feedback from the tutor and make recommended revisions to your paper.
  3. Then submit your revised paper and the feedback from tutor.com to the assignment folder by the assigned due date.

Assignments/Scholarly Paper/Root Cause Analysis Paper - Part 3 Final.pdf

Fa2020

Scholarly Paper – Part 3

Root Cause Analysis Paper – Part 3: Final Paper Write a 6-8 page (excluding cover sheet and reference page) scholarly paper following APA 7th edition guidelines. The paper must include a cover sheet and reference page. NOTE: Points will be deducted for not meeting the minimum or exceeding the maximum page limit. This assignment is graded for content and academic writing style and must include the following elements (considering adapting these elements as headings for the paper):

1. Introduction a. Introductory paragraph with a problem statement or thesis statement (what is the

problem?)

b. State the details of the case you will be analyzing (tell the story).

2. Background a. Discuss the key concepts related to this case that you identified as pertinent based on

the research and related articles (are there similarities between your issue and what you read about in your source material?).

b. Discuss the significance and importance of the case relevant to nursing practice/patient safety/healthcare quality. What, if anything, has been done or has changed to address issues brought about as a result of problem (are there gaps in the system(s) that led to or contribute to the problem you are analyzing?)?

3. Analyze the possible causes of the problem a. Utilize the resources from the course, samples provided, and RCA assessment tools to

conduct both a written and graphic analysis of the problem (apply the RCA tool).

4. Propose possible solutions to prevent the problem in the future (solutions should flow from causes identified in your analysis).

a. What action(s) can you identify that are specific, practical, and relevant and flow from analyses of identified causes?

5. Summary and Conclusions a. Summarize the main points highlighted in the body of the paper.

b. Explain the implications and impact of your proposed solution(s) on nursing practice/patient safety/healthcare quality (what is the takeaway, specifically regarding nursing care and nursing practice?).

c. Revisit your problem statement or thesis statement. Do not introduce new ideas!

• Appropriate in-text citations from a minimum of 5 sources must be included in this paper (see source requirements from Part 2).

• Each of these elements must be clearly articulated.

• See Grading Rubric: Root Cause Analysis Scholarly Paper for detailed grading criteria.

• Remember this is a 6-to-8-page paper. Stay within these parameters and avoid wordiness. You are writing in a dry academic style rather than an expository style. Write a narrative and not bullet points. Emulate the writing style of many of your source articles.

Fa2020

NOTE: You will submit the Part 3: Final paper to tutor.com before uploading to the assignment folder in

D2L. Allow time to receive the feedback from the tutor and make recommended revisions. You will then

submit your revised paper and the feedback from tutor.com to the assignment folder.

Assignments/Scholarly Paper/RCA Sample Papers/RCA Sample Papers Sp21/RCA Sample Paper 1_Medication Errors.pdf

1

RCA PAPER: MEDICATION ERRORS

Student Name

Nursing Department, Normandale Community College

NURS 2950: Leadership in Nursing

Mary Maine

Date

2

RCA Paper: Medication Errors

Medication administration errors (MAE) are events that all healthcare professionals deal

with. It is said that all nurses will commit a medical error in their career. The hope is that it will

be one that will not cause harm to the patient. In my own experience as a nurse’s aide there has

been a range of medication errors, from administering half of the required dose of calcium, to

neglecting documentation of an administration, to double dosing a patient on a beta blocker, to

administering all twenty-four hours of a client’s medications in one administration. Good

examples to invite the reader to continue

Consequences of MAEs can vary from no noticeable problem to substantial harm to the

client. In an article by Ohio Nurses Review (2016) they report that nurses witness many

medication errors and often no harm is done while at other times the client is harmed. MAEs that

do not cause harm are not noticed, however, it does not matter if an error does not have a

harmful consequence. All medication errors need to be taken seriously and reported to avoid

further errors. According to Hammoudi et al. (2017), the vast majority of MAEs occur from

previously neglected reporting and correcting of smaller errors. Neglecting to report and correct

problems leads to bigger problems and subsequently, larger consequences. In this analysis an

example of a fatal MAEs in a long-term care facility will be examined including, what lead to

this error in medication administration, what leads to common MAEs, and what strategies can be

implemented to prevent errors. Nicely presented

MAE in a Long-Term Care Facility

During an evening shift at a long-term care facility, the nurse on duty was an LPN agency

nurse. Although she was not a regular nurse at this facility, the nurse had worked at the facility

several times and was familiar with the medication administration policy and procedures. During

3

the evening medication pass the LPN was in with an elderly woman (Resident #1) preparing her

medications when she was called away to another resident who was asking for assistance. She

left and assisted the other resident. When she returned, she began to administer what she thought

was resident #1’s medication. The resident stated that she had never taken “purple pills” before

and questioned the administration. The nurse assured her that the medication was correct and the

resident took the pills. About an hour later she was found by an aide unresponsive. The LPN

came to find her with a thready pulse and shallow respirations. She called 911. When the

paramedics arrived, they administered Narcan, which instantly revived the resident. She was

taken to the hospital; on the way she told the paramedics that the nurse “had given her 4 purple

pills” and that she had fallen asleep after taking them. During her stay at the hospital the resident

came in and out of consciousness with the administration of Narcan, but ultimately did not

survive (NSO, 2020). Concise description provides the reader with enough background to

understand why this issue is important

Causes of MAEs

The literature reports that some of the most common causes of MAEs are: interruptions,

staffing issues, problems along the medication chain, and workplace culture and communication.

Nurses in long-term care facilities are often required to be multitaskers, balancing multiple tasks,

performing cares and skills, while ensuring patient safety. This second sentence further clarifies

the introductory sentence. Wonderful Tasks with high stakes such as medication administration

require a habit of undivided concentration. Flynn et al. (2016) emphasizes the importance of

concentration by stating the high levels of critical thinking and concentration needed for a safe

medication pass. Medication administration takes time, critical thinking and concentration,

4

however according to Ohio Nurse Review (2016), medication administration is one of the most

frequently interrupted tasks in nursing.

In an article by Hammoudi et al. (2017) nurses report that insufficient staffing promotes

interruptions and adversely affects safety. Inadequate staffing necessitates frequent position

changes and subsequently, shifting concentration. This adds to distraction, contributing to

MAEs. yes

The next contributing factor discussed is the medication chain. To err is human. This is

seen in the medication chain. Vermeulen et al. (2017) states that errors can happen in various

stages of the medication process: the provider can make an error in writing the prescription, the

pharmacy in preparation or delivery, or an error can occur in the administration. The nurse is

often the last line of defense against errors and so is held accountable for errors in administration

(Taylor, 2012). But the actual cause of the harm to a patient may originate anywhere in the

process of providing medications and every healthcare worker involved shares responsibility

(Taylor, 2012). Well written

The problems found in the medication chain signifies another problem, which is a lack of

a culture of safety. This deficiency is evidenced by the type of distractions that occur. Some

distractions seem more acceptable, such as a patient needing care, which is a common

interruption in medication administration (Flynn et al., 2016). The amount of concentration

needed for medication preparation needs to be recognized however. All of the preparer’s

attention must be devoted to that moment in time as if every medication pass was someone’s life

hanging in the balance, because it is. Frequently the types of interruptions are other nurses

engaging each other while one is preparing to administer medications. Flynn et al. (2016) notes

that a common interruption is nurses interrupting each other with unrelated topics of

5

conversation. These types of interruptions are a clear indicator that a culture of safety is lacking.

A deficit in a culture of safety does not stop at nurses. For there to be a cultural change everyone

involved must be committed to safety. This includes the whole chain of medication production.

Nurses alone will not correct problems embedded in an interprofessional process. Hammoudi et

al. (2017) states that common factors in MAEs among nurses come from further up the

medication process, such as an error in transcription, packaging, or even communication.

Another indicator of a culture lacking in safety is negligence of medication error reporting.

Adverse effects have been seen to occur as a result of not reporting small errors in medication

administration (Hammoudi et al., 2017). Medication error reporting prevents injury. For

example, a nurse administering medications may see an order that is contraindicated for a client

because of a change in condition and holds it but does not contact the prescribing provider to

have the order changed. Negligence of reporting this may be detrimental the following day when

another nurse gives the medication without questioning, leading to harm to the client. Many

nurses face fears about disciplinary action or losing their job which discourages the reporting of

errors. According to Hammoudi et al. (2017) “The main barriers to the reporting of errors by

nurses were related to the administrative response, fear of reporting and disagreements regarding

the definitions of errors” OK (p. 1038). There are obstacles to reporting errors but the

consequence of not reporting them is too great to be ignored. If the nurse in our previous

scenario had reported the contraindicated medication, she would have prevented her fellow nurse

from making the error the following day. This act of reporting may not have been for herself but

rather for the whole team and ultimately, for the safety of the client.

Analysis of possible causes

6

From the review of the literature, it is seen that MAEs are complex problems. Analysis of

the contributing factors of the death of resident #1 from a morphine overdose will now be

examined. The three major contributing factors to this MAE were distraction during medication

administration, failure to follow the rights of medication administration, and failure to receive

input from the client. The delay of naloxone, also called Narcan, administration will also be

discussed.

Being the nurse in a long-term care facility can be hectic. It feels like one is pulled in all

directions. This sets a nurse up for distraction and interruptions. This is what is seen in this story.

Although the LPN on duty had worked at that facility several times, she was not a staff nurse

there. This factor is important because it means the LPN was not familiar with the residents and

their medication. The evening medication pass is a busy time. Although the LPN was familiar

with the procedures of medication administration at the facility, she was distracted by an aide

requesting that she help another resident. The LPN steps away in the middle of a medication pass

for resident #1. A distracting environment is not a circumstance that the LPN could control;

however, she did have choices in the other two factors. As nurses we choose how we administer

medications, if the order is checked, and whether to listen to the client when they question our

judgement. The NSO article, that tells this story of the morphine overdose, describes one

medication right as documenting contemporaneously, or simultaneously, to the administration of

medication (NSO, 2020). This means avoiding premature documentation and not waiting on

documentation of medication administration. It seems the LPN did not complete this right, if she

had, she likely would have caught her error. Excellent, you clearly communicate the complexity

of the issue

7

Finally, the LPN failed to verify the right patient, and administered the incorrect

medication. In recommendations for safe practice the NSO states the importance of listening to

client’s concerns and verifying orders before proceeding, which was neglected (NSO, 2020).

Resident #1 questioned the medication, but the LPN did not verify that it was correct.

Naloxone, the antidote to morphine, was not given until the paramedics arrived. Where

morphine is administered there should be access to the antidote, however it seemed it was not on

site or the LPN was not familiar with the protocol.

Figure 1

Fishbone Diagram; Causes of Medication Errors Fantastic

8

This diagram displays the factors that led to this error. Harm to clients usually involve

elements of the environment, the people, and their individual practices, the processes set up, the

management, the materials and the equipment that one is working with. When harm to a client

occurs, it is usually a combination of several factors that add up to the event, in this case, the

untimely death of an elderly lady. Good summary

Solutions

When looking at the various factors involved in MAEs there are multiple elements that

need to be addressed. These elements include: individual responsibility as nurses, improvements

to the work environmental, and thoughtful system changes. Ideally, these changes will provide

consistency and compensate for the aspect of human error that will always be present. For

instance, every person involved in the medication chain should be dedicated to the safety of their

clients. Every action regarding medications should be approached, by each individual, with

vigilance. Problems still arise however. If the problem of maintaining vigilance throughout years

of medication administration is corrected there may still be problems if the work culture is

fraught with interruptions that are considered normal and a medication chain leaves room for

human error. Changes need to be made at all levels, not simply individual.

It has been found that adding computerized checks to the medication administration

process can help eliminate human error. It is unknown what kind of order the LPN had access to,

it is probable that it was a paper medication administration record (MAR). This system of

medication administration could be improved. In an effort to reduce human error the barcode

system has been implemented in many practices. This is described in the Taylor (2012) text as a

computerized system in which it is required that the nurse scans the patient’s wristband and the

medication. In this way it is more difficult to commit MAEs. This solution may not be affordable

9

for the facility. There are other strategies that they could implement that would be affordable. In

the story incomplete rights of medication administration and distraction were key factors that led

to this error (NSO, 2020). To promote the three checks and five rights of administering

medication being completed every time the facility could mandate yearly education. This would

allow all staff to review proper medication administration, be observed for habits that could lead

to MAEs, be educated on the importance of reporting all MAEs and on the importance of

finishing medication administration before continuing on to the next task. There should be follow

up on this measure. Weekly auditing could be completed by alternating staff of paper MARs to

check for proper documentation. The facility could also track reported medication errors to see if

the yearly education is effective. In an article by Flynn et al. (2016) they found that

implementing quiet zones or wearing an indicator that they should not be interrupted, such as a

hat, was effective in decreasing distractions. This would also promote a culture of respect for the

medication administration process.

While consistent staffing is not always possible it should be the goal of long-term care

facilities. It allows relationships to grow between staff and residents, positively affecting care

both psychosocially and physiologically. It promotes trust and communication between the

caregiver and resident. The familiarity could decrease MAEs, if the LPN on duty had been

familiar with the resident, she would likely have remembered that resident #1 did not take

morphine. She also may have been more likely to recheck the medication.

Finally, it is unknown if the facility had naloxone on site. It was not given until the

paramedics arrived. Either the LPN did not know the procedure for morphine overdose or

naloxone was not on site. To correct this the facility would provide naloxone on site and provide

education for all staff.

10

Throughout this paper we have seen the importance of safely administering medications

and what contributes to MAEs. While safe medication administration is every individual’s

responsibility, systems problems contributing to MAEs need to be evaluated. Improvement in

interprofessional communication, and cultures that reflect the importance of safety should be

seen as the result of careful assessment and implementation of error proofing tactics.

Insert a page break here to keep the reference page separate

11

References

Flynn, F., Evanish, J.Q., Fernald, J.M., Hutchinson, D.E., Lefaiver, C. (2016). Progressive care

nurses improving patient safety by limiting interruptions during medication

administration. Critical Care Nurse, 36(4), 19–35. https://doi-

org.ndcproxy.mnpals.net/10.4037/ccn2016498

Hammoudi, B. M., Ismaile, S., & Abu Yahya, O. (2018). Factors associated with medication

administration errors and why nurses fail to report them. Scandinavian Journal of Caring

Sciences, 32(3), 1038–1046. https://doi-org.ndcproxy.mnpals.net/10.1111/scs.12546

NSO Insurance – Learning - Individuals – NSO®. (2020). Retrieved December 16, 2020, from

https://www.nso.com/risk-management/individuals?ViewAll=true

Taylor, C., Lynn, P., Bartlett, J. L. (2012). Lippincott CoursePoint for Taylor: Fundamentals of

Nursing. (9th edition). (pp. 834-838). Wolters Kluwer. Retrieved from

https://coursepoint.vitalsource.com/#/books/9781975101336/

Vermeulen, J. A., Kleefstra, S. M., Zijp, E. M., & Kool, R. B. (2017). Understanding the impact

of supervision on reducing medication risks: an interview study in long-term elderly care.

BMC Health Services Research, 17, 1–10. https://doi

org.ndcproxy.mnpals.net/10.1186/s12913-017-2418-6

Waiton, B. (2016). Are you prepared to prevent medication errors? Ohio Nurses Review, 91(4),

17–27.

Perfectly Formatted

Assignments/Scholarly Paper/RCA Sample Papers/RCA Sample Papers Sp21/RCA Sample Paper 2_Drug Diversion.pdf

RUNNING HEAD: DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS – no running head for student

papers

1

Root Cause Analysis of Drug Diversion and Subsequent Bloodborne Infections

Student Name

Normandale Community College

NURS 2950

Mary Maine

Date

DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS 2

Include Title on page 2

Drug diversion is obtaining or using prescription medications illegally. To obtain or to

use prescription drugs illegally is known as drug diversion or medication diversion. Use active

voice. It strengthens your writing When a person uses prescription drugs illegally, they likely do

not consider the impact it has on the community around them, because often there is no most

occasions are not followed by an immediate and glaring negative outcome. The consequences of

such behavior are usually too subtle and chronic to be noticed until addiction has taken hold.

Healthcare workers (HCW) such as nurses, pharmacists, and physicians, are not immune to drug

diversion this behavior. Given their ease of access to these medications they are actually at an

increased risk of substance abuse (Johnson & Borsheski, 2019). Contrary Compared to the

general population, HCW are much more likely to see an immediate negative outcome due to the

nature of their work. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),

HCWs who divert medication for their own use put their patients at risk of harm in multiple

different ways. The quality of care delivered is reduced when impaired, the patient is denied

essential pain medication, and the patient is put at risk for infections when injectable medications

are tampered with. This is how sentences should read; rat-a-tat-tat, brisk and resolute. Very

good! This essay not an essay will examine one such event where a well-respected nurse diverted

narcotic medication from patient controlled analgesic (PCA) pumps, which led to several

patients contracting a blood borne infection. Good An analysis of the factors involved that

caused in causing this event, as well as possible solutions to avoid future events, will be

addressed in the following paragraphs. Eliminate unnecessary verbiage. Otherwise, a strong

introduction

Background

DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS 3

The A Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) investigation summary (2012) reported

that between December 2010 and February 2011, St. Cloud Hospital (SCH) experienced a cluster

of patients who contracted unusual bacterial infections while in the hospitalized. Initially, there

were six patient cases from the same Surgical Progressive Care Unit (SPCU), four whose blood

cultures tested positive for Ochrobactrum anthropi, and two that tested positive for Klebsiella

oxytoca. Oh dear Further investigation found patients infected with Stenotrophomonas

maltophilia. O. anthropi and S. maltophilia to enhance readability, I recommend writing out the

entire bacterium at the start of a sentence, especially since the previous sentence ends with a

bacterium are commonly found in the environment but rarely infect humans, and K. oxytoca is a

known human pathogen but rarely found in the environment. Compelling background

information Rightfully concerned, the hospital's infection preventionist (IP) began to investigate

these cases. The hospital suspected product contamination because all six patients were

prescribed PCA pumps and two of these pumps later tested positive for K. oxytoca. A PCA pump

is a device that allows patients to administer a moderated amount of pain medication, through an

intravenous line, with the press of a button. The hospital then contacted the state health

department, who then enlisted the CDC for assistance with the investigation. Well written

The MDH conducted an epidemiological investigation to determine if there were other

infections related to this cluster. They found a total of twenty-five patients, between October

2010 and March 2011, who all had stayed on the same surgical unit. All of these patients were

given narcotic prescriptions and later tested positive for bacterial infections originating from one

of more of the species previously listed. The multi-organizational investigation looked into

numerous causes of this outbreak by thoroughly analyzing the hospital's surgical environment

DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS 4

and infection control procedures. They found no significant evidence of contamination

throughout the environment and the hospital's systems.

It was not until a month into the investigation the hospital staff reviewed how frequently

narcotics were accessed on this unit. Narcotics were kept in a locked box on the unit. The keys to

the box were only accessible through a medication dispensing machine which required a user

code. While looking through these logs, the investigation team discovered one employee, a nurse

referred to as healthcare worker A (HCW-A), had accessed the narcotics box at a rate several

times higher than his peers. When HCW-A was confronted by the investigation, he admitted to

removing narcotics from the bags used for PCA pumps with a syringe and replacing the stolen

medication with normal saline. The MDH investigation concluded the infections were caused by

contaminated narcotics, which were most likely caused by HCW-A breaching sterile procedure

when accessing the fluid or using a contaminated needle when diverting/replacing. As a result,

HCW- A was fired from SCH. The hospital submitted reports to the MN board of nursing and

other organizations, however he did not immediately lose his nursing license. According to the

MDH investigation summary; “the reports were delayed, and the content lacked critical details

(e.g. bacteremia detected in 25 patients on the Surgical Unit/SPCU within a defined time

period)” (O’Connell, 2012, p. 7). While this was only an epidemiological investigation and could

not bring criminal charges, the report did express concerns that the nurse might return to

diverting narcotics at another health agency. Inevitably, this case went on to federal court and the

Twin Cities Pioneer Press (2013) reported the HCW-A had his nursing license revoked, and was

sentenced to two years in federal prison, (oxford comma [my preference] just a suggestion) and

fined $340,000.

Analysis and Solutions

DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS 5

Figure 1: label the figure with a title

Nicely presented

This event was turned into became a large news story throughout the state and medical

community because, plainly put, someone in a trusted, respected position abused their power for

selfish gain. Once all the information was compiled, it was easy for the health department, the

legal system, the news, and the general public to point the preoverbial finger at HCW-A as the

cause of this outbreak and close the case. However, AORN Journal Johnson and Borsheski

(2020) reported that drug diversion is a known issue among healthcare and the Africa Journal of

Nursing and Midwifery Vorster et al (2019) recognized nurses are at high risk and prevalence of

substance abuse due to physical and psychological stress of their role. If this was not a rare event

of drug diversion, why was the outcome allowed to become so severe and affect so many

patients? Good question When this event is studied in search of a solution to avoid similar

events, and not in search of singular blame, many contributing factors arise worthy of come to

light reassessment. The root cause of the twenty-five patients being infected as a result of

DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS 6

narcotic diversion can be attributed to flaws in four flawed variables: equipment, environment,

culture, and people. This analysis can be visualized through Figure 1 provided above, moreover,

a discussion of these flaws, and recommended solutions will be presented below.

Level 2 heading

The first variable to analyze is the equipment. There are multiple pieces of equipment

involved in this event that, with proper safety features, could have mitigated this negative

outcome. This includes the medication dispensing machine, known as an Omnicell at SCH,

which held the keys to the narcotics box. HCW-A was allowed to access the keys, through the

Omnicell, several times more frequently than other nurses on the unit. The Omnicell did not have

limitations or protocol to avoid this abuse, leaving the HCW with an open supply of free

narcotics. If the machine would have flagged this, the event could have been caught sooner. In

2019, AORN Journal published an article titled “Recognizing and Preventing Perioperative Drug

Diversion” where they suggest regular audits of opioid access records, such as the Omincell log,

as a way of detecting drug diversion early. If SCH staff had implemented this practice, they

would have discovered HCW-As actions earlier. The other piece of equipment which facilitated

the drug diversion was the narcotic bags themselves. The containers in which the drugs were

stored in, and later administered through, were easily tampered with to siphon the product. This

created the opportunity for HCW-A to divert the medication which broke the sterility of the

contents, leading to patient infection.

Level 2 heading

The physical environment of the surgical unit also facilitated the diversion, and

subsequent infections, by providing HCW-A time and space to perform the act of siphoning and

use the drug without consequence. According to the MDH investigation report (2012), the

DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS 7

narcotic box was located behind a door near an employee bathroom. This provided HCW-A with

privacy when accessing the narcotics, likely giving him time to siphon the narcotics.

Furthermore, the privacy he enjoyed when accessing the narcotics box likely dampened

suspicion of other employees who would otherwise notice his frequent access. Finally, the

location of the box being adjacent to an employee restroom provided HCW-A the perfect place

to use the stolen drugs and discard the evidence without fear of being caught. The solution to this

issue is simple and suggested by the MHD report; move the narcotic box to a common area

where other staff members are regularly present. With other staff members around, people will

be much less likely to attempt or succeed at stealing medications.

Level 2 heading

It is possible that the culture of SCH contributed to the ongoing diversion of narcotics

and subsequent infections. This could happen in a few different ways or a combination of

multiple. First, one of HCW-As’ coworkers might have had some suspicions of this issue, but

can the 2 sentences before and after the comma stand on their own? If not, no comma is

necessary failed to report it out of apathy or fear of repercussions. HCW-A was a seventeen year

veteran of SCH, so a newer nurse might not want to report them because of their seniority status.

It is also possible the coworker didn’t think it was a very serious offense worthy of reporting.

The MHD report (2012) recommends promoting a culture which encourages staff to report

suspicious behavior regarding pharmaceuticals to the proper personnel, to avoid future events.

Another way culture could have impacted this situation is HCW-A's own perception of his

addiction. He might have been ashamed of his addiction and worried about the negative effects

on his career if he sought treatment. Instead, he tried to hide it which led to the patient infections

and serious legal consequences. Instituting education programs for all employees that focus on

DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS 8

empathy and respect for people suffering from addiction could change the culture around this

issue and increase the number of people seeking treatment. According to the Journal of Nursing

Scholarship (2020), implementing addiction treatment based on compassion, patience, and

respect showed significantly higher rates of seeking and staying in treatment. If all employees of

SCH had this mindset, HCW-As actions could have been avoided and treated properly.

Level 2 heading

The most direct contributing factor to this event was the people involved. HCW-A was

the individual closest and most responsible, however, there are other people involved who could

have potentially mitigated the damage of this event. One example is the infection prevention and

control department of SCH. This department, for reasons unknown, did not investigate or report

the cluster of infections until six patients with hospital acquired bacterial infections presented at

the same time. The MDH review of patient infections in this hospital found that there were many

other cases which matched the criteria, but were unreported by the hospital's IP staff. There is

also evidence in the MDH report (2012) which suggests that some of the hospital staff who

initiated the investigation did not look objectively into the possibility of HCW-A diverting drugs.

The report mentions the possibility of a personal or professional relationship between the

investigation staff and HCW-A, which could have slowed the process. In order to avoid this in

the future, hospital administrators must ensure there is no relationship between the investigation

staff and the target of the investigation. The MDH investigation report (2012) also suggests

improved staffing of the IP department with the goal of more efficient and effective control of

hospital outbreaks.

Conclusion

DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS 9

This event involved a nurse who became addicted to opioids and started diverting these

medications from SCH for his own use. The action of this diversion resulted in twenty-five

patients contracting rare bloodborne infections from tampered PCA pump medications. In a

retrospective review of the event, the nurse should have never been allowed to negatively affect

so many patients. It was through gaps in the equipment, environment, culture and people

involved this was allowed to reach such a dramatic outcome. Reviewing narcotic access logs

frequently, moving narcotic boxes into open spaces, implementing a culture of respect and

responsibility, and holding the people accountable to this culture are imperative features of a safe

healthcare organization. By implementing these changes, further infections as a result of drug

diversion can be avoided. Excellent concluding summary

Great work

DRUG DIVERSION AND INFECTIONS 10

References

Burton, William,B.S.N., R.N., & Martin, April, PhD,R.N., N.H.A. (2020). Opioid overdose and

addiction treatment: A collaborative model of compassion, patience, and respect. Journal

of Nursing Scholarship, 52(4), 344-351.

doi:http://dx.doi.org.ndcproxy.mnpals.net/10.1111/jnu.12562

Hanners, D. (2015, November 6). St. Cloud nurse gets 2 years for IV drug thefts that spread

infection to 25 patients. Twin Cities. https://www.twincities.com/2013/03/19/st-cloud-

nurse-gets-2-years-for-iv-drug-thefts-that-spread-infection-to-25-patients/.

Johnson, Q. L.,M.D.M.B.A., & Borsheski, R., D.O. (2019). Recognizing and preventing

perioperative drug diversion: The official voice of perioperative nursing. AORN Journal,

110(6), 657-662. doi:http://dx.doi.org.ndcproxy.mnpals.net/10.1002/aorn.12878

O'Connell, H. A. (2014, September 14). Outbreak of Gram-Negative Bacteremia at St. Cloud

Hospital Investigation Summary, Minnesota Department of Health, 2011.

www.health.state.mn.us. https://www.health.state.mn.us/diseases/hai

drugdiversionreport.pdf.

Risks of Healthcare-associated Infections from Drug Diversion. (2019, November 26). Retrieved

December 06, 2020, from https://www.cdc.gov/injectionsafety/drugdiversion/index.html

Vorster, A., Gerber, A. M., van der Merwe, L. J., & van Zyl, S. (2019). Second-Year Nursing

Students’ Self-Reported Alcohol and Substance Use and Academic Performance. Africa

Journal of Nursing & Midwifery, 21(1), 1–14. https://doi-

org.ndcproxy.mnpals.net/10.25159/2520-5293/4150

Review reference page formatting. Only last names and first (and middle) initials are used.

Otherwise looks good

Assignments/Scholarly Paper/RCA Sample Papers/RCA Sample Papers Sp21/RCA Sample Paper 3_Medication Error.pdf

1

Medication Error Turned Deadly

Student Name

Normandale Community College

NURS 2950 Leadership 1

Mary Alice Maine, MA, RN, PHN, CNE

Date

MEDICATION ERROR 2

NO RUNNING HEAD FOR STUDENT PAPERS

No Title

An old proverb coined by Alexander Pope states that to err is human. In the field of

medicine, one small error in judgement can become a life-threatening mistake. A medication

error can result in serious injury or even death. According to the United States Food and Drug

Administration (FDA, 2019), a medication error is any preventable occurrence that may result in

the improper use of medication and or lead to harm of the patient while the medication is in the

control of the healthcare professional. The unanticipated injury or death within a healthcare

setting is referred to as a sentinel event. A medication error can result from a multitude of factors

such as improper communication, insufficient staffing of healthcare professionals, faults within

facility-wide medication distribution systems, and improper documentation in electronic health

records. In the United States alone, more than 100,000 reports were made to the FDA for

suspected medication errors last year (FDA, 2019). Strong support for examining this issue

Being the predominate caregivers within the hospital setting, nurses account for the majority of

those at fault responsible? with for? medication errors (Brown, 2016). This paper will discuss a

specific case study, highlighting a sentinel event that occurred due to a medication error. This

case will be broken down to determine and evaluate the possible causes that are responsible for

the poor patient outcome. This paper will also evaluate contributing factors that surrounded the

delay in treatment of the medication error. Strong introduction

Introduction: Medication Error Case Study

This case study involves an otherwise healthy 23-year-old woman who was seen in the

emergency department for flu-like symptoms. She presented with a fever of 102.6 F, generalized

body aches, shortness of breath, and malaise. A chest CT scan showed near complete collapse of

her right upper lobe and considerable consolidation of all other remaining lobes. Her blood work

MEDICATION ERROR 3

NO RUNNING HEAD FOR STUDENT PAPERS

showed elevated white blood cell count (WBC), decreased liver function, and an abnormal

coagulation profile. Blood cultures came back positive for Streptococcus Pneumoniae. Oxygen

and antibiotic therapies were initiated, and the patient was admitted to the ICU for close

monitoring.

Upon arrival to the ICU, the attending physician received her laboratory blood chemistry

report, which showed the patient’s potassium was abnormally low, at 2.9 mmol/L. The attending

physician ordered 30mEq of potassium to be added to each bag of the patient’s intravenous fluid,

infused at 80 milliliters per hour. The order was to be maintained through the remainder of her

course of treatment. A recheck of the potassium two days later showed only a small increase in

the level, bringing it to 3.0 mmol/L. The physician then initiated 80 mEq of potassium to be

administered once by mouth. The patient, however, vomited and was unable to keep down the

oral administration of potassium. The physician then ordered two doses of 40mEq of oh no

intravenous potassium to be infused over a four-hour time frame in order to increase the patient’s

potassium level from 3 mmol/L to 4 mmol/L. Here is where the medication error occureds. The

ICU nurse responsible for the patient that morning improperly administered two doses of

potassium 20mEq via IV, which was infused over a period of one hour. Vital signs immediately

following the infusion were within the stable range although her heart rate continued to increase

throughout shift. It should be noted that this nurse was floated to the ICU that day due to

shortage of nursing staff on the unit. Although she was accustomed to being floated to other

units, she was not experienced in this critical care setting.

Later that evening the patient was transferred from the ICU to a telemetry unit, which

was in the midst of an overflow situation, for cardiac monitoring around 1915 without a cardiac

monitor in place. There had been a steady increase in the patient’s heart rate throughout the day.

MEDICATION ERROR 4

NO RUNNING HEAD FOR STUDENT PAPERS

The documentation shows that at 0730 the heart rate was 72 beats per minute, at 1330 it was 96

beats per minute, and at 1630 it was 116 beats per minute. This increase in heart rate was not

communicated with the attending physician or at the hand off with receiving staff in the

telemetry unit. It was also not communicated that the patient had orders for oxygen therapy and

continuous cardiac monitoring upon transfer. The attending physician received a call at

approximately 2200 with report that the patient was in cardiac arrest. After emergency

resuscitation attempts by the on-call physician, the patient was later pronounced dead. The

family of the woman later brought this case to court in a malpractice suit. These allegations

against the ICU nurse included medication administration error, failure to monitor, and failure to

utilize the nursing chain of command.

MEDICATION ERROR 5

NO RUNNING HEAD FOR STUDENT PAPERS

Background: Examining the Root Cause Factors Wow! This is terrific!

The sentinel event was a patient death rather than a medication error. The contributing

factors led to more than a medication error.

The fishbone diagram above gives a thorough detail of all the potential elements that may

have contributed to the error in medication administration. The main causative factors that led to

patient’s untimely death are the inexperience and understaffing of the nurses and poor

communication between members of the patient’s care team. Although the nurse was

inexperienced in the ICU department, she failed to express her concern to the supervising RN.

The situation may have been alleviated by having more skilled nursing staff supervise her on the

floor or transferring her to unit that she was familiar with. She failed to correctly communicate

MEDICATION ERROR 6

NO RUNNING HEAD FOR STUDENT PAPERS

the change in condition to the provider and other staff. Although the medication error is primarily

to blame, the death of the patient could have been prevented by early detection of EKG changes

on the cardiac monitoring strip that was to be implemented upon the arrival to the telemetry unit.

This would have been performed if proper verbal communication and documentation were

completed at the time of patient hand off between the ICU and telemetry staff. The medication

error set off a chain of events that uncovered many system-wide failures

Understaffing

The unavailability of experienced nursing staff plays a key role in the cause of this

medication error. The nurse who overdosed the potassium was not experienced in ICU patient

care. She was pulled to the unit to fill the gap in the nurse to patient quota, due to shortage of

staff. Understaffing of nurses is a large contributing factor to medication errors in hospitals. This

is even more evident in areas where patients are critically ill and require specialized care, such as

the ICU. A poor patient outcome such as cardiac arrest has a direct relationship with low nurse

staffing. Is there a citation for this information? Hospitals that increase the RN to patient ratio

have been proven to reduce patient mortality rates by over 50% (Martin, 2017). Understaffing

leads to unmanageable workload due to not only the improper nurse to patient ratios, but can also

be affected by the level of patient acuity. Patients that are high acuity require more nursing care.

This can cause fatigue and increased distractions, which can hinder the nurse’s responsibility to

correctly verify medication orders using the six rights of drug administration (Mcmahon,_2017).

To improve the understaffing of nurses, hospitals need to increase the RN to patient ratio

by employing more nursing staff. A valid concern of facilities is the costs associated with the

increased hiring of skilled nurses. Recent studies show that although there is a slight change in

operating expenses with the increase of nursing staff, there is a direct correlation with a decrease

MEDICATION ERROR 7

NO RUNNING HEAD FOR STUDENT PAPERS

in the monetary amount spent on adverse patient outcomes (Martin, 2015). This will greatly

improve the facility’s financial stability in the future. The reduction of adverse patient outcomes

will also improve the reputation of the facility, which will, in turn, yield more patients and

revenue.

Another important improvement in nurse staffing is proper training for those nurses that

may be assigned to multiple units. This can be achieved by utilizing competencies that are

required by any staff working in specific departments (McMahon, 2017). Competencies are

forms of continued education that allow nurses the refresh of knowledge of concepts,

medications, and skills they may not be performing routinely.

Communication

Although the nurse properly documented the change in pulse on the electronic health

record (EHR), she did not acknowledge or report the change to the attending physician. The

patient who was now deemed stable, was transferred from the ICU to a telemetry floor, which

was being used as an overflow unit for general med/surg patients. There was poor

communication at patient hand off while transferring the patient from one unit to the next. The

nurses failed to report the steady consistent increase in heart rate or the need for continuous

cardiac monitoring and oxygen therapy. According to Taylor (2015), “two thirds of sentinel

events in hospitals are related to communication issues, with patient handoff accounting for a

large portion of miscommunication” (p. 415). The nurse also failed to follow protocol of

correctly documenting the time of transfer, along with patient condition when transferring the

patient care.

An improvement in communication needs to be addressed in a variety of different areas.

According to Brown (2016), failure to communicate is one of the leading reasons for malpractice

MEDICATION ERROR 8

NO RUNNING HEAD FOR STUDENT PAPERS

charges against nurses in the United States. An important role in communication is utilizing

proper documentation in the patient’s electronic health record. Documentation is often

overlooked, as it takes ample time to complete properly. This is a responsibility that needs to be

prioritized even if it takes place outside of direct patient care. Everything that was done,

observed, given, or taught to the patient should be indicated in the patient’s chart. It is often said

that a task was not done if it has not been documented. Proper documentation of patient care

needs to become a priority not only for safe patient outcomes, but protection and proof that the

health care staff were performing their job safely (Kreimer, 2015). This can be accomplished by

providing thorough EHR training for new hires and on a continual basis with annual

competencies.

In order to improve hand off communication, nurses should try diligently to perform

nurse to nurse hand offs at patient’s bedside whenever possible. Evidence-based practice proves

that this form of communication will improve not only patient outcome, but patient satisfaction

as well (Taylor, 2015). This allows the patient to be a part of his or her own care. This also

provides nurses with a quiet environment that lends itself for giving a thorough full report.

Conclusion

A medication error that leads to untimely death of a patient is rarely something that is

done intentionally with maleficence in the heart. Health care providers chose their profession as

they feel they are meant to serve and help others. Unfortunately, there are challenges within the

system, along with inadvertent human error that can lead to these horrific events. Adequate nurse

staffing and a strong communication among health care staff can greatly reduce the occurrence

of medication administration error. By analyzing the contributing factors, health care facilities

are better able to prevent such tragedy in the future. Humans are always evolving. By learning

MEDICATION ERROR 9

NO RUNNING HEAD FOR STUDENT PAPERS

from past mistakes, healthcare professionals can improve the outlook for prevention of such

errors in the future.

Excellent summary

MEDICATION ERROR 10

NO RUNNING HEAD FOR STUDENT PAPERS

References

Brown, G. (2016). Averting malpractice issues in today’s nursing practice. ABNF Journal, 27(2),

25–27.

Kreimer, S. (2015). Avoiding an EHR-related malpractice suit. Contemporary OB/GYN, 60(12),

39–42.

Martin, C. J. (2015). The effects of nurse staffing on quality of care. MEDSURG Nursing, 24(2),

4–6.

McMahon, J. (2017). Improving medication administration safety in the clinical

environment. MEDSURG Nursing, 26(6), 374–409.

Taylor, J. S. (2015). Improving patient safety and satisfaction with standardized bedside handoff

and walking rounds. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 19(4), 414–416. https://doi-

org.ndcproxy.mnpals.net/10.1188/15.CJON.414-416

U.S Food and Drug Administration (2019, August 23). Working to reduce medication error.

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-information-consumers/working-reduce-medication-

errors

Perfectly formatted

Assignments/Scholarly Paper/RCA Sample Papers/RCA Sample Papers Sp21/RCA Sample Paper 4_Patient Falls.pdf

1

Investigating Patient Falls

Student Name

Normandale Community College

Date

2

Investigating Patient Falls

Patient falls are a serious safety concern for hospitalized patients. In fact, falls are the

leading hospital acquired condition (HAC) in America; they total 85% of all HACs as over a

million Americans fall in the hospital annually (Cuttler, 2017). Strong supporting source Falls

can result in serious injuries such as fractures, concussions, and even death. As these injuries

occur, hospitalizations become more complex and the average stay is extended 6.3 days (The

Joint Commission, 2015). Unfortunately, between one third and one half of all patients who

experience a fall will sustain an injury from the event (Ambutas, 2017). This adds extra cost and

discomfort for the patient, while straining the healthcare system with extended occupancy by

extending patient stay. Hospitals have been working to reduce patient falls for a long time, but

sustaining success proves to be difficult (The Joint Commission, 2015). While there are

numerous ways to prevent falls, there is no one solution. Most successful efforts have involved

numerous interventions working in tandem to improve patient safety. It is critically important

that staff, patients, and family are educated, and interventions are in place to prevent falls from

occurring. Strong introduction

Background

In one instance, the initial steps to protect the patient were taken and a fall still occurred.

In this case, there was a 70-year-old male patient with comorbidities that can affect stability such

as Parkinson’s disease and heart disease (Sanchez, 2020). He was admitted to the hospital after

experiencing shortness of breath and recent falls at home (Sanchez, 2020). During the initial

assessment, the patient was found to be delirious and hypotensive (Sanchez, 2020). This

assessment prompted staff to consider the patient a high fall risk and led caretakers to use a bed

alarm as a safety intervention (Sanchez, 2020). The nurse reported responding to the patient’s

3

bed alarm at least 10 times over the course of the shift. Regardless, during shift change the

patient was found on the floor (Sanchez, 2020). Upon discovering the patient on the floor, it was

found the bed alarm had been deactivated, though the responsible party was never determined

(Sanchez, 2020). This fall led to multiple rib fractures and a sprained wrist (Sanchez, 2020).

After the fall, the patient remained in the hospital for ten days with a 1:1 observer before being

discharged to rehabilitation (Sanchez, 2020). Deletions recommended to tighten writing

Examining Contributing Factors

There are many reasons why a patient may fall. and In fact, the patient in this case had

numerous contributing circumstances. Upon admission, the patient was exhibited signs of

delirium. Delirium is a state of acute confusion associated with HACs including falls (Dean,

2017). These confused states are especially dangerous in unfamiliar surroundings, where a

wandering patient can encounters unanticipated obstacles as they try to adapt to the environment.

Furthermore, the patient was hypotensive. When patients are hypotensive, they have inadequate

blood pressure to perfuse the body and the brain. When the brain is not sufficiently perfused

patients can feel weak, tired, and dizzy which can lead to falls. Most alarmingly, the patient had

a known history of recent falls. In instances when patients have a recent fall history, clinicians

can surmise that the patient is already struggling with mobility. In fact, suffering from a fall

previously is the leading predictor of a future fall (Stoeckle, 2019). Excellent Given these risks,

the patient was correctly identified as a high risk for a fall. However, the only documented

intervention staff utilized was a bed alarm that was ultimately disabled. Effectively presented

Numerous studies have shown that bed alarms alone are not effective at preventing

patient falls (Cuttler, 2017). Even so, the bed alarm was not effectively being utilized. When the

patient was discovered, the bed alarm had been deactivated, effectively disabling the only

4

documented safeguard in place. Keeping the bedside alarm inactive gives the patient an

opportunity to leave their bed without their nurse’s knowledge. Worse yet, it provided an

opening for a patient to fall unbeknownst to their care staff. Poor adherence to safety practices is

a common contributing factor to falls (The Joint Commission, 2015). Disabling the bed alarm in

this case is a grievous example of how poor safety adherence can lead to injury.

Further, the party responsible for deactivating the alarm was never identified, this

demonstrates both a lack of documentation and communication. Poor communication is

problematic in a hospital setting, frequently contributing to patient fall (The Joint Commission,

2015). When there is a breakdown in communication, staff responsible for a patient’s care may

be unaware of their status. Understanding a patient’s status is critically important to the nurse,

this is why patient assessment is the first part of the nursing process. When this information is

not gathered or communicated, staff cannot provide cares the patient needs because they are not

aware of their needs. In this case, had the staff documented that the bedside alarm had been

disabled, the care providers could understand they need to round more frequently status, or they

made have just reactivated the alarm. Instead, the team was unaware the alarm was turned off

and they found out after an incident had already occurred.

Additionally, there was no documented patient education. As patients are brought into an

acute setting many tasks become different from what they may be accustomed to, from toileting,

to meals, to changing a television channel. Patients must be instructed on how to call for

assistance or where they can access their belongs (Cuttler, 2017). When these instructions are

provided, studies have shown a decline in fall incidences (Cuttler, 2017). If this patient was not

properly educated, their confusion may have worsened and led them to try to be more self-

sufficient than they safely could be.

5

Finally, it is probable that the care team was inadequately rounding on the patient. As

there is a lapse in documentation in this case, it is difficult to ascertain the frequency of patient

rounding the nurse provided. However, it was identified that the patient wasn’t found on the

ground until the next shift checked on the patient during the shift change. If the nurse was not

rounding frequently, they may have put the patient at an increased risk for a HAC (Forde, 2014).

In fact, rounding on an hourly basis has been shown to reduce patient falls by 50%, while

rounding every two hours has no effect preventing falls (Forde, 2014). Well summarized,

information is presented sequentially and logically. The reader is able to easily follow ideas

Figure 1 Excellent cause-and-effect diagram

Fishbone diagram of fall factors in patient case study

6

Possible Solutions

Improving patient care after a sentinel event referring to ‘sentinel event’ is new. Be sure

to use this term earlier in the paper often involves a series of policy changes. These changes aim

to improve processes that may have been hazardous, so these events aren’t repeated in the future.

These policy changes are driven by the root cause analysis. They use the data from the analysis is

examined to find the breakdown in care and then the policy is shaped to address the issues. There

were several contributing factors in the case discussed above, therefore, several policies may

need to be changed in order to see future improvement. Good introductory paragraph for this

section

Upon admission the patient was properly assessed, however the next step in patient intake

was overlooked. The patient needs to be educated to assimilate to their new environment and

they need to be taught about the risks inherent to the hospital. Research has shown that playing a

video that demonstrates how to call for assistance, how to place items in accessible reach, and

how to inform a nurse when guests have left helps reduce patient falls (Cuttler, 2017). Creating a

policy to educate patients and familiarize them to the hospital can may their stay less disorienting

and help them know when they need assistance. If this educational practice were in place, it is

possible the patient would have turned on their call light instead of attempting to leave bed. It is

recommended that one-on-one education includes explaining risks and prevention strategies (The

Joint Commission, 2017). Providing these teachings can increase patient engagement and

understanding in their care and the risks they face. In nursing, education is the first step in

creating favorable outcomes.

While bedside alarms are useful tools, they are not effective as a stand-alone intervention

(Cuttler, 2017). Instead, research shows using three-mode bedside alarms are an effective

7

intervention when in tandem with proper patient education (Cuttler, 2017). These alarms have

three sensitivities to detect motion at the edge of the bed at their least sensitive, to detecting any

motion in bed at their most sensitive. Such a device was used in this patient’s case, however, at

some point in the evening it was disabled. If a policy had been in place to prevent disabling the

bed exit alarm until the patient was no longer a fall risk, the nurse could have heard the alarm

and responded before an incident occurred.

Policies to improve professional communication also need to be enacted to prevent future

events. These need to come as a series of policy changes. According to The Joint Commission

(2017), poor communication is one of the most common factors leading patient falls. The Joint

Commission (2017) recommends using a standardized hand-off process which includes

identifying patient specific risks. This includes using a white board that is accessible to all staff

in the patient room to communicate fall risk, documenting alerts in the patient record, and

disclosing fall risk concerns during the shift report. Placing signage on the patient’s door, such as

a yellow stop sign, can provide all staff with at-a-glance information about the patient risks.

Following these policies is essential, so everyone involved in the patient’s care can better

understand and anticipate patient needs. As lapses in communication occur, caregivers may not

understand a patient’s needs. When patient needs are not understood, they may be underserved

and experience poor outcomes like a fall.

To make these policies effective, accountability needs to improve. When falls with injury

cases were analyzed, lacking leadership was one of the most contributing factors (The Joint

Commission, 2015). In this case, no one was identified for disabling the bed alarm and

documentation regarding patient care was grossly lacking. These oversights led to a injurious fall

the cause multiple fracture, an extended hospital stay, a rehabilitation process, and a patient

8

settlement once the fall was investigated. To prevent these incidents from repeating policies must

be adhered to and leadership plays a vital role in that adherence (Ambutas, 2017). As leaders

begin to champion new policies and support their staff, adherence to the policies and overall

accountability will improve, along with patient outcomes (Ambutas, 2017).

Summary and Conclusion

Patient falls are a serious problem in the healthcare community. As seen in the case

discussed, patient falls can cause considerable injury. While this data only represents a small

proportion of the total events, The Joint Commission (2017) found approximately 63% of falls

with injury since 2009 many falls resulted in death. Even when patients survive, falls with injury

incur costs of approximately $14,000 on average (The Joint Commission, 2017). Unintentional

falls lead to heath care costs estimated to be $31.3 billion dollars a year (Stoeckle, 2019). Don’t

introduce new information in the summary While patient falls are often complex event involving

numerous variables, it is crucial that steps are taken to identify their causes and prevent future

incidences. Prolonged reductions in patient falls continues to elude most hospitals (The Joint

Commission, 2017), but efforts to improve must continue. While the financial burden on the

healthcare system is reason enough to fight for better policies, it is the harm caused to patients

and their families that demands fall prevention policies improve. If the policies discussed had

been implemented, the patient in the analyzed case may not have fallen. The healthcare system

needs to continue to analyze the root causes of these falls and introduce new policies to prevent

them. With continued effort patient falls can and should be prevented.

9

References

References

Ambutas, S., Lamb, K. V., & Quigley, P. (2017). Fall Reduction and Injury Prevention Toolkit:

Implementation on Two Medical-Surgical Units. Medsurg Nursing, 26(3), 175–179,197.

https://doi.org/http://ndcproxy.mnpals.net/login?url=https://www-proquest-

com.ndcproxy.mnpals.net/scholarly-journals/fall-reduction-injury-prevention-

toolkit/docview/1906916551/se-2?accountid=4885.

Cuttler, S. J., Barr-Walker, J., & Cuttler, L. (2017). Reducing medical-surgical inpatient falls and

injuries with videos, icons and alarms. BMJ Open Quality, 6(2), e000119.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000119

Dean, E. (2017). Delirium. Nursing Standard, 32(8), 15–15. Retrieved December 6, 2020, from

https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.32.8.15.s16

Forde-Johnston, C. (2014). Intentional rounding: A review of the literature. Nursing Standard,

28(32), 37–42.

https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2014.04.28.32.37.e8564

Sanchez, J. (2020, December 6). Deactivated bed alarm. CRICO.

https://www.rmf.harvard.edu/Clinician-Resources/Case-Study/2020/Deactivated-Bed-

Alarm

Stoeckle, A., Iseler, J. I., Havey, R., & Aebersold, C. (2019). Catching quality before it falls:

Preventing falls and injuries in the adult emergency department. Journal of Emergency

Nursing, 45(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2018.08.001

The Joint Commission. (2015). Preventing falls and fall-related injuries in health care facilities.

Sentinel Event Alert, 55, 1–5.

10

https://doi.org/https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/deprecated-

unorganized/imported-assets/tjc/system-folders/topics-

library/sea_55pdf.pdf?db=web&hash=53EE3CDCBD00C29C89B781C4F4CFA1D7

Looks good