Research method approach report

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rglo20

Globalizations

ISSN: 1474-7731 (Print) 1474-774X (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rglo20

Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring

Habibul Haque Khondker

To cite this article: Habibul Haque Khondker (2011) Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring, Globalizations, 8:5, 675-679, DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2011.621287

To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2011.621287

Published online: 18 Nov 2011.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 36466

Citing articles: 180 View citing articles

Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring

HABIBUL HAQUE KHONDKER

Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

ABSTRACT This article examines the role of the new media in the ‘Arab Spring’ in the Middle

East and North Africa (MENA) region. It argues that although the new media is one of the factors

in the social revolution among others such as social and political factors in the region, it

nevertheless played a critical role especially in light of the absence of an open media and a

civil society. The significance of the globalization of the new media is highlighted as it presents

an interesting case of horizontal connectivity in social mobilization as well signaling a new

trend in the intersection of new media and conventional media such as television, radio, and

mobile phone. One of the contradictions of the present phase of globalization is that the state

in many contexts facilitated the promotion of new media due to economic compulsion,

inadvertently facing the social and political consequences of the new media.

Keywords: new media, social movement, globalization, Middle East

Globalization as a complex social, economic, and technological process can be viewed in terms

of the spread and wider availability of communication technology which intensifies connec-

tivity. Such connectivity is as vital for facilitating business transactions as it is for social inter-

actions and mobilizations. There is an inherent contradiction in this process since it is often the

government, aided by corporate interests, that promotes the new media thus inadvertently creat-

ing a space for civic activism. Thus, as the new communication technology spreads to wider

arenas, new uncertainties are introduced. As Roland Robertson argues in some contexts,

growing surveillance technology—an aspect of new, invasive information technology—threa-

tens an open society leading to a syndrome of open society and closed mind (Robertson,

2007). Drawing on his metaphor, it can be said that, in other contexts, it may create a tension

between closed society and open mind. New information technology has clearly the transforma-

tive potential to open up spaces of freedom. The recent political transformations in the MENA

Correspondence Address: Habibul Haque Khondker, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Zayed University,

PO Box 4783, UAE. Email: [email protected]

ISSN 1474-7731 Print/ISSN 1474-774X Online/11/050675 – 5 # 2011 Taylor & Francis http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2011.621287

Globalizations

October 2011, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 675 – 679

region provide us an opportunity to examine both the limits and potential contributions of the

new media in paving the way for freedom and openness.

On 6 April 2008 when the Egyptian authority locked up Kareem Al Beheiri, a worker turned

labor rights activist and blogger, for allegedly instigating riots, the news was picked up by the

conventional media but neither hogged the headlines nor stayed in the media limelight for long.

The news of his protest was subsumed under the broader protests and demonstrations against the

rising food inflation in Egypt and a number of other developing countries. Beheiri was tortured in

custody and later released. His cyberactivism was part of a growing movement, albeit gradual,

where new media was used effectively to mobilize people against a regime in power for three

decades. Cyberactivism in Egypt had emerged since 2004 as it began to spread in other parts

of the Middle East, marking the ushering of cyber-civil society, and a virtual replacement for

the muzzled media. Since 2008, in the face of a global economic crisis and enhanced political

repression, Egypt has seen growing protests where various forms of new media have played a

crucial role. How significant is the role is, however, a matter of some contention. When Wael

Ghonim, a major figure in cyberactivism in Egypt, stated in an interview with CNN days

before the ouster of Hosni Mubarak, ‘If you want to free a society just given them internet

access’ (Khamis and Vaughn, 2011, p. 1) he was probably exaggerating. Gamal Ibrahim, a

young parent, named his daughter ‘Facebook’ in recognition of the role of the social media in

bringing about the revolution (CNN, 2011). The exuberance is understandable given the

timing of her birth. But it was at best an example of exuberance. Is the Internet or Facebook

or Twitter or their combined effect good enough to cause social revolution leading to

freedom? What about the use of the same instruments of the new media by the political

power as tools of repression? What are the ancillary factors that may tilt the contest one way

or the other?

Sociological discussion on the potential of the new media in shaping society began in earnest

with Manuel Castells’s ground-breaking work, The Rise of the Network Society (1996) and more

recently, Communication Power (2009). A number of writers in the last decade of the twentieth

century recognized the potential of the Internet as a vehicle for disseminating democracy

(Poster, 1995). More recent writers have identified the nuances as well as limits to the role of

the new media in politics (Howard, 2011). The discussions on this subject are divided

between those who emphasize the controlling role of the new media, as a new tool of repression

in the arsenal of the dictators, and those who see it as a tool for democratic openness. Even in

democratic societies, as some writers point out, the new technology poses a grave threat to the

freedom and privacy of citizens. Other writers often get somewhat carried away with the poten-

tial role of the new media in shaping politics, opening up a new public sphere, especially in

societies where a real public sphere is absent. There are, however, some writers who have pre-

sented a more balanced view of the pitfalls and potential, of the controlling as well as emanci-

patory role of the new media.

In Tunisia, when the fruit-seller, Mohamed Bouazizi resorted to self-immolation to protest the

price hike and political repression, the event became national and eventually international news

thanks to the combined effects of conventional media and the new media. Television networks

such as Al Jazeera and Facebook both played a significant role in disseminating information and

mobilizing the masses of protestors in Tunisia. Both virtual and real revolutionaries came out in

droves to protest.

Mr Khaled Koubaa, the president of the Internet Society in Tunisia reported that of the 2,000

registered tweeters barely 200 were active users but before the revolution there were two million

users of Facebook. ‘Social media was absolutely crucial’, says Koubaa. ‘Three months before

676 H. H. Khondker

Mohammed Bouazizi burned himself in Sidi Bouzid we had a similar case in Monastir. But no

one knew about it because it was not filmed. What made a difference this time is that the images

of Bouaziz were put on Facebook and everyone saw it’ (Beaumont, 2011). Stressing the role of

the new media, Zeynep Tufekci (2011) makes the point that in Tunisia protest movements were

crushed in 2008 without a significant backlash. Part of the reason was that at that time there were

only 28,000 Facebook users in Tunisia. In other words, the new media penetration was low. In

December 2010, the news of the self-immolation of Bouazizi in a small town was transmitted by

the new media, triggering mass protests.

The Tunisian revolution spilled over into Egypt. In both cases, the new media played a key

role. The revolution was labeled the Jasmine Revolution in part because it was not as violent

as it could have been—as it unfolded in Libya months later. Given the dominant role of the

new media, the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions have been called Facebook or Twitter revolu-

tions. There is no question that the social networking applications played a vital role in organiz-

ing and publicizing social protests. Control of conventional media made the role of new media

more relevant. During the anti-Mubarak protests, an Egyptian activist put it succinctly in a tweet:

‘we use Facebook to schedule the protests, Twitter to coordinate, and YouTube to tell the world’

(Global Voice Advocacy, 2010). However, to overstate the role of the new media may not be

helpful. Certainly, social network sites and the Internet were useful tools, but conventional

media played a crucial role in presenting the uprisings to the larger global community who in

turn supported the transformations.

The Egyptian revolution was well organized, coordinated, and civil (Abaza, 2011; Bamyeh,

2011) and at every step the new media played its part. On 6 June 2010 Khaled Said, an Egyptian

blogger, was dragged out of a cybercafé and beaten to death by policemen in Alexandria, Egypt.

The café owner, Mr Hassan Mosbah, gave the details of this murder in a filmed interview, which

was posted online, and pictures of Mr Said’s shattered face appeared on social networking sites.

On 14 June 2010 Issandr El Amrani posted the details on the blog site Global Voices Advocacy

(Global Voices Advocacy, accessed on 24 June 2011). A young Google executive Wael Ghonim

created a Facebook page, ‘We Are All Khaled Said’, which enlisted 350,000 members before 14

January 2011 (Giglio, 2011, p. 15).

On 17 June 2011 when Maha al-Qahtani, a 39-year-old Saudi woman, decided to drive a car in

Riyadh, a conservative city, with her husband in the passenger seat, she was arrested and later

released. However, her defiant protest received wider media attention and got traction in the new

media. Ms Manal al-Sharif, a 32-year-old IT consultant who set up a Facebook campaign called

women2drive, was arrested on 21 May (Allam, 2011). Her Facebook site remains a space for

cyberactivism. A woman posted a picture of a woman driving while wearing an abaya (a

black dress covering the entire body) on this site, which now carries the name of Manal and

Bertha. More and more women and men—Saudis and non-Saudis—continue to express solidar-

ity posting various contents one of which includes a message of support for the freedom-loving

Saudi women from the US Secretary of State, Ms Hillary Clinton. The Facebook site has also

hosted a YouTube video clipping made from television coverage of an earlier protest of

similar nature when 47 Saudi women representing a cross-section of society broke the taboo

by driving their cars in defiance of a government ban of 6 November 1990. New comments

and contents taken from televised news are being added to the women2drive site almost on a

daily basis.

Whether these gestures mark a new beginning or not is a moot question. The incipient cyber-

activism in Saudi Arabia may not herald an Arab spring, at least, in the near future. The out-

comes of the spread of the new media are likely to remain uneven in different parts of the

Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring 677

MENA region. Despite the uneven outcomes, there seems to be no holding back the march of

cyberactivism in this region. Cyberactivism has been defined as ‘the act of using the internet

to advance a political cause that is difficult to advance offline’ (Howard, 2011, p. 145). In

Egypt digital media was used to tell stories of police brutality, violence, and blatant injustice.

In the end, the new media helped protestors mobilize specific political outcome such as the

removal of President Hosni Mubarak.

As the cyber protests signify a window of change in Saudi society thanks to the new media—

assorted tools such as Facebook, Twitter, Internet-based communication, etc. There are also

websites created by conservatives in order to vilify these women. Thus, the new media

becomes a contesed site. It is impossible not to pay attention to two points. First, the new

media is a tool, a means rather than the end of social movement. Hence, the role of new media

is contingent on the movements on the street. And the new media has been a contesting site of

resistance for all the interest groups in the twenty-first century (Ho et al., 2002). The debate

over the competing role of the conventional media versus new media has been a false debate.

Even before the uprisings in the MENA region, it was argued that ‘horizontal networks of com-

munication, such as the Internet, to have significant impact on the majority of the population

they need to be relayed by the mass media, as was the case in the diffusion of the pictures of

torture in the Abu Ghraib’ (Arsenault and Castells, 2006, p. 303).

There is no question that social media played a significant role in the political movements in

Tunisia and Egypt, but one should not overstate the role. The role of conventional media, especially

television (e.g. Al Jazeera), was crucial. However, the most important underlying factor was the

presence of revolutionary conditions and the inability of the state apparatus to contain the revolu-

tionary upsurge. In this schema, social media was a vital tool—a necessary condition—especially in

the face of a muzzled conventional local media, but a tool nevertheless. It was not a sufficient con-

dition. Stressing the role of Al Jazeera in Arabic as well as the BBC, France 24, Al Hiwar, and other

channels in presenting the news of the Arab spring, Manuel Castells states,

Al Jazeera has collected the information disseminated on the Internet by the people using them as sources and organized groups on Facebook, then retransmitting free news on mobile phones. Thus was born a new system of mass communication built like a mix between an interactive television, internet, radio and mobile communication systems. The communication of the future is already used by the revolutions of the present. . . . Obviously communication technologies did not give birth to the insurgency. The rebellion was born from the poverty and social exclusion that afflict much of the population in this fake democracy, . . . (Castells, 2011; emphasis in the original)

The new media’s role can be likened to the historic role of print media in fostering nationalism

through what Benedict Anderson (1991) calls ‘print capitalism’, or the role of literacy in raising

consciousness in pre-revolutionary eighteenth-century France as the works of Robert Darnton

(1982) and John Markoff (1986) illustrate. Markoff shows that in regions with higher literacy,

revolutionary activities were more organized compared to those in low literacy regions.

However, revolution did not wait for the even spread of literacy.

Social network or not, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen, and Bahrain were ready for revo-

lutionary movements due to an assortment of politico-economic conditions. Similarly, to what

extent these revolutions will be successful or not depends on several factors—some known

and some yet unknown, in which social networks may play a supportive role at best.

678 H. H. Khondker

References

Abaza, M. (2011) Revolutionary moments in Tahrir Square, Global Dialogue, 1(4), pp. 3–5, http://www.isa-sociology.

org/global-dialogue/newsletters4/GD%201.4%20English.pdf

Allam, A. (2011) Saudi female drivers defy rules, Financial Times, 17 June.

Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London: Verso).

Arsenault, A. & Castells, M. (2006) Conquering the minds, conquering Iraq: the social production of misinformation in

the United States: a case study, Information, Communication and Society, 9(3), pp. 284–308.

Bamyeh, M. (2011) The Egyptian revolution: first impressions from the field, The Asia-Pacific Journal Japan Focus,

http://japanfocus.org/-Mohammed-Bamyeh/3486

Beaumont, P. (2011) The truth about Twitter, Facebook and the uprisings in the Arab world, The Guardian, 25 February.

Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell).

Castells, M. (2009) Communication Power (New York: Oxford University Press).

Castells, M. (2011) Interview posted on http://globalsociology.com/2011/02/07/the-sociology-elders-on-the-social-

movements-in-tunisia-and-egypt/ (accessed 25 June 2011).

CNN (2011) http://articles.cnn.com/2011-02-21/world/egypt.child.facebook_1_facebook-page-wael-ghonim-social-

media?_s=PM:WORLD (accessed 26 June 2011).

Darnton, R. (1982) The Literary Underground of the Old Regime (Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press).

Giglio, M. (2011) The Facebook freedom fighters, Newsweek, 21 February.

Global Voice Advocacy (2010) Website, http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/ (accessed 23 June 2011)

Ho, K. C., Baber, Z. & Khondker, H. (2002) ‘Sites’ of resistance: alternative websites and state – society relations, The

British Journal of Sociology, 53(1), pp. 127–148.

Howard, P. N. (2011) The Digital Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Information technology and Political Islam

(Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Khamis, S. & Vaughn, K. (2011) Cyberactivism in the Egyptian revolution: how civic engagement and citizen journalism

tilted the balance, Arab Media and Society (Online Journal), http://www.arabmediasociety.com/?article=769

(accessed 24 June 2011).

Markoff, J. (1986) Some effects of literacy in eighteenth century France, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 17(2),

pp. 311–333.

Poster, M. (1995) Cyberdemocracy: Internet and the public sphere, http://www.humanities.uci.edu/mposter/writings/

democ.html (accessed 22 June 2011).

Robertson, R. (2007) Open societies, closed minds: exploring the ubiquity of suspicion and voyeurism, Globalizations,

4(3), pp. 399–416.

Tufekci, Z. (2011) Technosociology website, http://technosociology.org/?page_id=2 (accessed 22 June 2011).

Habibul Haque Khondker Ph.D. (Pittsburgh) is Professor in the Department of Humanities and

Social Sciences at Zayed University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. His books include Glo-

balization: East and West (with Bryan Turner; Sage, 2010), The Middle East and the Twenty-first

Century Globalization (with Jan Nederveen Pieterse; 2010) and Asia and Europe in Globaliza-

tion: Continents, Regions, and Nations (with Goran Therborn; Brill, 2006).

Role of the New Media in the Arab Spring 679