RMRP#7

profileCBUNN
RM4.docx

2

2

Data Analysis

Data Analysis: Descriptive Statistics and Assumption Testing

Correlation: Descriptive Statistics and Assumption Testing

Frequency Distribution Table

PM Size

Frequency

0-1

8

2-4

24

5-7

37

8-10

34

Sick Days

Frequency

0-2

1

4-7

61

8-9

30

10-12

11

Histogram

Descriptive Statistics Table

Microns

Mean

5.6573

Standard Error

0.2556

Median

6

Mode

8

Standard deviation

2.5941

Sample variance

6.729

Kurtosis

-0.8522

Skewness

0.3733

Range

9.8

Minimum

0.2

Maximum

10

Sum

582.7

Count

103

Largest

10

Smallest

0.2

Confidence

0.507

Level

7

Sick Days

Mean

7.126

Standard Error

0.1865

Median

7

Mode

7

Standard deviation

1.8923

Sample variance

3.582

Kurtosis

0.1249

Skewness

0.1422

Range

10

Minimum

2

Maximum

12

Sum

734

Count

103

Largest

112

Smallest

2

Confidence

Level

0.3699

Therefore, the used hypothesis include;

Ho; The sample data are not significantly different from the average population.

Ha; Sample data are not significantly different from the average population depicted.

Kurtosis depicts -0.8522, and skewness of 0.373 is close to zero and lies within the range of -2 to 2. This indicates that the data is symmetrical, as confirmed by the mean and median.

The null hypothesis is accepted.

Measurement Scale

The measurement scale is ordinal.

The measure of Central Tendency

The measure of central tendency is determined through the mean. The normal distribution means that the data graph gives the shape of a bell curve.

Skewness and Kurtosis

Kurtosis depicts -0.8522, and skewness of 0.373 is close to zero and lies within the range of -2 to 2.

Evaluation The normal distribution means that the data graph gives the shape of a bell curve. Kurtosis depicts -0.8522, and skewness of 0.373 is close to zero and lies within the range of -2 to 2.

Simple Regression: Descriptive Statistics and Assumption Testing

Frequency Distribution Table

Expenditure

Frequency

20-500

108

501-1000

76

1001-1500

27

1501-2000

11

2001-2500

1

Time

Frequency

0-50

6

51-100

26

101-200

98

201-300

85

301-00

8

Histogram

Descriptive Statistics Table

Safety Training Expenditure

Mean

595.98

Standard Error

31.477

Median

507.78

Mode

234

Standard Deviation

470.0552

Sample variance

220948.9

Kurtosis

0.444

Skewness

0.951

Range

2251.4

Minimum

20.6

Maximum

2271.86

Sum

132904.5

Count

223

Largest

2271.86

Smallest

20.456

Confidence

62.03

Lost Time Hours

Mean

188

Standard Error

4.8031

Median

190

Mode

190

Standard Deviation

71.73

Sample variance

5144.54

Kurtosis

-0.5012

Skewness

-0.082

Range

350

Minimum

10

Maximum

360

Sum

41925

Count

223

Largest

360

Smallest

10

Confidence

9.465

The hypothesis utilized in this include;

Ho; The sample data used are not significantly different from the average population.

Ha; The sample data is not significantly different from the average population.

The Kurtosis and Skewness are close to zero within the -2 and 2 ranges provided. This suggests the data is symmetrical. This is not confirmed by the mean and median.

Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.

Measurement Scale

Nominal

The measure of Central Tendency

Median

Skewness and Kurtosis

kurtosis is close to zero.

Evaluation

The distributed mean indicates that the curve is bell-shaped and such data is symmetric around its standard, and its Kurtosis is close to zero.

Multiple Regression: Descriptive Statistics and Assumption Testing

Frequency Distribution Table

Decibel

Frequency

100-106

4

107-111

51

112-116

126

117-121

49

122-131

786

132-141

287

Histogram

Descriptive Statistics Table

Decibels

Mean

124.84

Standard Error

0.1779

Median

125.7

Mode

127.32

Standard Deviation

6.89

Sample variance

47.589

Kurtosis

-0.31

Skewness

-0.41

Range

37.61

Minimum

103.4

Maximum

140.9

Sum

187628.4

Count

1503

The hypothesis used include;

Ho; The sample data is not significantly different from the average population.

Ha; The sample data are significantly different from the average population.

The Kurtosis and skewness are close to zero and within the range of -2 to 2, indicating the data is symmetrical as confirmed by the mean and the median.

The null hypothesis is accepted.

Measurement Scale

Internal

The measure of Central Tendency

Mean

Skewness and Kurtosis

The Kurtosis is equal to Zero

Evaluation

The distribution illustrates that the data provides a bell-shaped curve and suggests the data is symmetrical. The Kurtosis is equal to Zero.

Independent Samples t-Test: Descriptive Statistics and Assumption Testing

Frequency Distribution Table

Training t-Test

Training

Frequency

49-60

12

61-70

20

71-80

21

81-90

8

91-100

1

Training

Training

Frequency

74-80

14

81-85

21

86-90

19

91-95

6

96-100

2

Histogram

Descriptive Statistics Table

Prior Training

Mean

69.79

Standard Error

1.403

Median

70

Mode

80

Standard Deviation

11.05

Sample variance

122

Kurtosis

-0.777

Skewness

-0.086

Range

41

Minimum

50

Maximum

91

Sum

4327

Count

62

Largest

91

Smallest

50

Confidence

2.81

Revised Training

Mean

84.77

Standard Error

0.659

Median

85

Mode

85

Standard Deviation

5.1927

Sample variance

26.96

Kurtosis

-0.352

Skewness

0.144

Range

22

Minimum

75

Maximum

97

Sum

5256

Count

62

Largest

97

Smallest

75

Confidence

1.319

The hypothesis used include;

Ho; The sample data is not significantly different from the average population.

Ha; The sample data are significantly different from the average population.

Kurtosis and skewness are close to zero and within the -2 to 2 range, indicating that the data is symmetrical as confirmed by the mean and the median.

The null hypothesis is accepted.

Measurement Scale

Internal

The measure of Central Tendency

Mean

Skewness and Kurtosis

Kurtosis is equal to zero.

Evaluation

The distribution means the graph data is bell-curved, which is symmetrical around.

Dependent Samples (Paired-Samples) t-Test: Descriptive Statistics and Assumption Testing

Frequency Distribution Table

Sample Data 2

Exposure

Frequency

05-015

5

16-25

8

26-35

12

36-45

16

46-56

8

Paired Sample Data

Exposure

Frequency

05-015

5

16-25

8

26-35

11

36-45

17

46-56

8

Histogram

Descriptive Statistics Table

Pre-Exposure

Mean

32.86

Standard Error

1.75

Median

35

Mode

36

Standard Deviation

12.27

Sample variance

150.46

Kurtosis

0.576

Skewness

0.25

Range

50

Minimum

6

Maximum

56

Sum

1610

Count

49

Largest

56

Smallest

6

Confidence

3.52

Post-Exposure

Mean

33.29

Standard Error

5.78

Median

36

Mode

38

Standard Deviation

12.47

Sample variance

155.5

Kurtosis

-0.65

Skewness

-0.48

Range

50

Minimum

6

Maximum

56

Sum

1631

Count

49

Largest

56

Smallest

6

Confidence

3.58

The hypothesis used include;

Ho; The sample data are not significantly different from the average population.

Ha; The sample data used is significantly different from the average population.

Kurtosis and skewness are close to zero and within the -2 to 2 range, indicating that the data is symmetrical as confirmed by the mean and the median.

The null hypothesis is accepted.

Measurement Scale

Internal

The measure of Central Tendency

Mean

Skewness and Kurtosis

Kurtosis is equal to zero.

Evaluation

The distribution means the graph data is bell-curved, which is symmetrical around.

ANOVA: Descriptive Statistics and Assumption Testing

Frequency Distribution Table

Air

Frequency

1.0-3.0

1

4.0-6.0

4

7.0-9.0

6

10.0-12.0

7

12.0-15.0

2

Water

Frequency

1.0-3.0

1

4.0-6.0

10

7.0-9.0

5

10.0-12.0

4

Soil

Frequency

5.0-7.0

3

8.0-10.0

13

10.0-13.0

4

Training

Frequency

1.0-3.0

1

4.0-6.0

16

7.0-9.0

3

Histogram

Descriptive Statistics Table

Air

Mean

8.9

Standard Error

0.68

Median

9

Mode

11

Standard Deviation

3.06

Sample variance

9.36

Kurtosis

-0.6

Skewness

-0.36

Range

11

Minimum

3

Maximum

14

Sum

178

Count

20

Largest

14

Smallest

3

Confidence

1.4

Soil

Mean

9.1

Standard Error

0.39

Median

9

Mode

8

Standard Deviation

1.74

Sample variance

3.04

Kurtosis

0.12

Skewness

0.49

Range

7

Minimum

6

Maximum

13

Sum

182

Count

20

Largest

13

Smallest

6

Confidence

0.82

Water

Mean

7

Standard Error

0.58

Median

6

Mode

6

Standard Deviation

2.56

Sample variance

6.6

Kurtosis

-0.24

Skewness

0.76

Range

9

Minimum

3

Maximum

12

Sum

140

Count

20

Largest

12

Smallest

3

Confidence

1.21

Training

Mean

5.4

Standard Error

0.27

Median

5

Mode

5

Standard Deviation

1.19

Sample variance

1.41

Kurtosis

0.25

Skewness

0.16

Range

5

Minimum

3

Maximum

8

Sum

108

Count

20

Largest

8

Smallest

3

Confidence

0.56

The hypothesis used include;

Ho; The sample data are not significantly different from the average population.

Ha; The sample data used is significantly different from the average population.

Kurtosis and skewness are close to zero and within the -2 to 2 range, indicating that the data is symmetrical as confirmed by the mean and the median.

The null hypothesis is accepted.

Measurement Scale

Ratio

The measure of Central Tendency

Mean

Skewness and Kurtosis

Kurtosis is equal to zero.

Evaluation

The distribution means the graph data is bell-curved, which is symmetrical around.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). SAGE.

Sound Level

Frequency 100-106 107-111 112-116 117-121 122-131 132-141 4 51 126 49 786 287

Traininig t-Test

Frequency 49-60 61-70 71-80 81-90 91-100 12 20 21 8 1

Training

Frequency 74-80 81-85 86-90 91-95 96-100 14 21 19 6 2

Sample Data 2

Frequency 05-015 16-25 26-35 36-45 46-56 5 8 12 16 8

Paired Sample Data

Frequency 05-015 16-25 26-35 36-45 46-56 5 8 11 17 8

Air

Frequency 1.0-3.0 4.0-6.0 7.0-9.0 10.0-12.0 12.0-15.0 1 4 6 7 2

Water

Frequency 1.0-3.0 4.0-6.0 7.0-9.0 10.0-12.0 1 10 5 4

Soil

Frequency 5.0-7.0 8.0-10.0 10.0-13.0 3 13 4

Training

Frequency 1.0-3.0 4.0-6.0 7.0-9.0 1 16 3

Histogram for Correlation

Frequency 0 to 1 2 to 4 5 to 7 8 to 10 8 24 37 34

Annual Sick Days

Frequency 0 to 2 4 to 7 8 to 9 10 to 12 1 61 30 11

Training Expenditure

Frequency 20-500 501-1000 1001-1500 1501-2000 2001-2500 108 76 27 11 1

Lost Time Hours

Frequency 0-50 51-100 101-200 201-300 301-00 6 26 98 85 8