Ris_Kim

profileMr.Garcia
RiskPerception.pptx

Risk Perception

An insightful comment

Reports that say that something hasn't happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns – the ones we don't know we don't know.

Donald Rumsfeld, February 12, 2002

Should you worry about any of these? Which ones?

Lightning

Tornadoes

Hurricanes

Heat

Blizzards

Some puzzles

Why do people fear genetically modified tomatoes but smoke cigarettes?

Why would someone pay more than twice as much for a product when the risk of minor injury associated with it is reduced from 15/10,000 to 10/10,000

(.0015 to .001) ?

Thinking about Risk

What risks do we face in everyday life?

How do people perceive risk?

What level of risk is acceptable?

How should we talk about risks?

Tradeoffs of costs and benefits

Value of human life

Bayes’ Theorem

Risk and Uncertainty

Risk: the distribution of possible outcomes is known

Uncertainty: the distribution of possible outcomes is unknown

Most people think of them interchangeably

How do experts talk about risk?

What is the hazard?

What happens when people are exposed to the hazard?

How many people are exposed to the hazard?

Tradeoffs between costs and benefits

Can you calculate whether a risk is worth taking?

How do insurance companies do this?

What about you?

Ebola in the US

Huge reaction in US media

A nurse returning from West Africa was forcibly quarantined after testing negative for Ebola.

Travel bans were urged by some politicians.

One college decided not to admit any African students.

2 people in the US died from the disease. Neither contracted it in the US.

Influenza in the US

Kills about 18,000 people annually

Annual vaccination recommended by CDC

Only about 40% of adults get the vaccine

Often available free

Why don’t people worry about the flu? Why do they worry about Ebola?

3 main factors in risk perception (Paul Slovic)

Dread

The unknown

Number of people affected

Plus availability heuristic

Dread risk

Dread

Perceived lack of control

Catastrophic potential

Fatal consequences

Unequal distribution of risks

The unknown

Unknown

Unobservable

New

Delayed harm

Number of people affected

Seems obvious

But we know that people are not good at estimating frequency

Other factors in risk perception

Trust

Source of hazard

Control

Identity of victim – age, celebrity status, relationship

Why don’t people worry about these?

Smoking

Texting while driving

Unsafe sex

How should we talk about risk?

Lifetime exposure to a certain pollutant is expected to kill 1.4 of 1,000 people.

Lifetime risk is 0.0014

Lifetime risk is 0.14%

Lifetime risk is 1 in 710

Out of 1,000 people, we could expect 1.4 more people to die.

Would concrete examples help?

Smoking kills about 480,000 people in the US annually.

Leading preventable cause of death

That’s more than 1,300 a day.

3 jumbo jet crashes per day, every day

The equivalent of the Titanic every day

16 times as many as are killed in car accidents

Innumeracy

It’s hard to understand the difference between 1/10,000 and 1/10,000,000

Lifetime risk of being struck by lightning?

1/12,000

1/9,000,000 chance of being struck twice

Chance of winning PowerBall?

1/292,000,000

For most of humanity’s existence, all we needed was to count

Most of what we needed to count was tangible.

Abstraction doesn’t come naturally

Germ theory of disease came from availability of microscopes

Doctors didn’t wash hands between surgeries until 1847

Technology enables us to detect risk

But few of us really understand its magnitude

Certainty has special status

Prospect theory

Difference between 0% and 5% perceived as much larger than difference between 25% and 30%

Same with 95% and 100%

Risk, Costs, and Benefits

Why are some risks ignored while others feared?

How much value do people place on reduced risk?

Willingness to Pay vs Willingness to Accept

WTP – WTA disparities

Norovirus is a highly contagious virus that causes nausea, abdominal pain, muscle aches and digestive problems. Most people recover within a week or so.

How much would you pay to reduce your risk of being infected with norovirus by 10%?

How much would you accept to increase your risk of being infected with norovirus by 10%?

WTP usually less than WTA for most situations

In some cases, WTA is infinite

No price is high enough to accept increased risk.

Why?

Value of a Human Life

http://www.lifehappens.org/insurance-calculators/calculate-human-life-value/

When do we place a value on human life?

How do we do it?

Tough questions: Medical care

The last year of life accounts for a large proportion of medical cost.

Humans are mortal.

Physicians are trained to keep people alive at any cost.

Most people say they want to die at home, with family, without tubes.

Most people die in a hospital, with tubes.

Suggestion to encourage end-of-life care discussions denounced as “death panels”

26

Oregon Health Plan

Establishes priorities for Medicaid spending

Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness

Recognizes limited resources

Evidence based

Highest priority for preventive treatment and chronic diseases

Maternity and newborn care

Diabetes

How can you compute risks?

A doctor detects a lump in a patient’s breast and estimates a 1% chance that it may be cancerous, based on many years of experience. To be on the safe side, a mammogram is performed. Mammograms are 80% accurate in detecting cancerous tumors and 90% accurate in detecting benign tumors. The mammogram is positive.

What is the chance that the patient has cancer?

Confusion of the Inverse

Probability of cancer given a positive test ???

Probability of a positive test given cancer

Bayes’ Theorem

A way to incorporate base rates and evidence

P (Hypothesis True|Data) =

P(Data| H True) * P(H True)

[P(Data|H True) * P(H True)] +[ P( Data|H False) * P(H False)]

Hypothesis True = Patient has cancer

Hypothesis False = Patient doesn’t have cancer

Data| H True = positive test when patient has cancer

Data| H False = positive test when patient doesn’t have cancer

The numbers for this example

Hypothesis True = Patient has cancer = .01

Hypothesis False = Patient doesn’t have cancer = .99

Data| H True = positive test when patient has cancer = .8

Data| H False = positive test when patient doesn’t have cancer = .1

Bayes’ Theorem, applied

P(disease| positive test) =

P(disease) * P(positive| disease)

P(disease) * P(positive| disease) + P(no disease) * P(positive| no disease)

= (.01 * .8)/(.01*.8) + (.99 *.10) = .008/.107 = .075 = 7.5%

A positive test result doesn’t always spell doom!

How can you deal with risk?

Understand the base rates

Remember that what you want to be true isn’t necessarily the case

Don’t get sidetracked by availability

image4.png

image5.png

image6.png

image13.png

image14.png

image2.png

image3.png