RiskManagementProgramAnalysisPartOnerubric.docx

Risk Management Program Analysis Part One

 

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 65.00%

3 Satisfactory 75.00%

4 Good 85.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

70.0 %Content

 

15.0 % Summary Description of the Type of Risk Management Plan Selected With Rationale

Not included.

A summary description of the type of risk management plan selected with rationale is somewhat incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

A summary description of the type of risk management plan selected with rationale is incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.

A summary description of the type of risk management plan selected with rationale is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.

A summary description of the type of risk management plan selected with rationale is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

15.0 % Description of Recommended Risk Management Program Administrative Steps and Processes Contrasted With the Administrative Steps and Processes in the Exemplar

Not included.

A description of recommended risk management program administrative steps and processes contrasted with the administrative steps and processes in the exemplar is somewhat incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

A description of recommended risk management program administrative steps and processes contrasted with the administrative steps and processes in the exemplar is incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.

A description of recommended risk management program administrative steps and processes contrasted with the administrative steps and processes in the exemplar is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.

A description of recommended risk management program administrative steps and processes contrasted with the administrative steps and processes in the exemplar is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

15.0 % Analysis of Key Regulatory Agencies and Organizations Inclusive of Their Roles in the Risk Management Oversight Process

Not included.

An analysis of key regulatory agencies and organizations inclusive of their roles in the risk management oversight process is somewhat incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

An analysis of key regulatory agencies and organizations inclusive of their roles in the risk management oversight process is incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.

An analysis of key regulatory agencies and organizations inclusive of their roles in the risk management oversight process is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.

An analysis of key regulatory agencies and organizations inclusive of their roles in the risk management oversight process is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

15.0 % Evaluation of the Exemplar Risk Management Plan Regarding Compliance With Relevant American Society of Healthcare Risk Management (ASHRM) Standards

Not included.

An evaluation of the exemplar risk management plan regarding compliance with relevant ASHRM standards is somewhat incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

An evaluation of the exemplar risk management plan regarding compliance with relevant ASHRM standards is incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.

An evaluation of the exemplar risk management plan regarding compliance with relevant ASHRM standards is present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.

An evaluation of the exemplar risk management plan regarding compliance with relevant ASHRM standards is present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

10.0 % Recommendations to the Risk Management Program Exemplar to Enhance, Improve, or Secure Compliance Standards

Not included.

Proposed recommendations to the risk management program exemplar to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards are somewhat incorporated, but the information provided is incomplete, inaccurate, or otherwise deficient.

Proposed recommendations to the risk management program exemplar to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards are incorporated, but minimal detail or support is provided for one or more components.

Proposed recommendations to the risk management program exemplar to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards are present and incorporated in full. The submission encompasses essential details and provides appropriate support.

Proposed recommendations to the risk management program exemplar to enhance, improve, or secure compliance standards are present and comprehensive. The submission further incorporates analysis of supporting evidence insightfully and provides specific examples with relevance. Level of detail is appropriate.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

7.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

8.0 % Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

 

5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

 

5.0 % Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 % Total Weightage