Essay
|
Rhetorical Situation |
|||
|
Rhetorical Feature |
Identification What is it? |
Textual Evidence What suggests that answer? |
Explanation Why does that text suggest that answer? |
|
Occasion |
To teach |
based on the responses of freshman college students and experienced writes |
Title of essay, "Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers" |
|
Audience |
Teachers |
This study was based on the responses of freshman college students and experienced writes. |
sequence of changes in a composition |
|
Purpose |
To persuade teachers and students that revision is an important key to a good essay |
Writer sees their revision process as a recursive process, each cycle of writing is important seek to discover meaning in revisions imagine a reader when writing, helps influence their revision process |
Sommers suggested that writers should focus on the idea of the work, elaborate those ideas, and find a position for their work |
|
Argument/Message |
How to revise a paper |
She explains that the students did not see revision as something they actually do but as a term their instructor uses |
Sommer ending words, “Good writing disturbs: it creates dissonance. Students need to seek the dissonance of discovery, utilizing in their writing, as the experienced writers do, the very difference between writing and speech- the possibility of revision” |
|
Rhetorical Appeals |
|||
|
Rhetorical Appeal |
Textual Evidence What in the text makes that appeal? |
Explanation How does it make that appeal? |
Evaluation Why is this an effective or ineffective appeal? |
|
Logos |
Four revision operations were identified: deletion, substitution, addition, and reordering. Also four levels of changes were identified: word, phrase, sentence, and theme. These methods were the most common among the writers as processes for revision. |
Author used comparisons |
Effective appeal, logic of argument |
|
Logos |
revision is understood as a separate stage at the end of the process—a stage that comes after the completion of a first or second draft and one that is temporally distinct from the prewriting and writing stages of the process |
Audience will think that what author was saying makes sense |
Effective appeal, logic of argument |
|
Ethos |
The study included twenty freshmen from Boston University and the University of Oklahoma with SAT verbal scores from 450-600. Also included twenty experienced writers, including editors and journalists. The examination consisted of writing three essays each (twice) with a total of nine essays. These essays were analyzed and categorized identifying different revision operations. |
Use of credible source |
Effective appeal, Author’s credibility and character |
|
Ethos |
Nancy Sommers conducted a series of studies over three years in which she studied revision processes of student and experienced writers to see their methods of revision during their writing process |
expression of experience |
Effective appeal Author’s credibility and character
|
|
Pathos |
Most of the students I studied did not use the terms revision or rewriting. In fact ,they did not seem comfortable using the word revision and explained that revision was not a word they used, but the word their teachers used. |
author depicts vivid description |
Effective, Author made her point with specific word and phrase about revision |