i need someone to write me a english rhetorical analysis essay (6 pages) and i need it in 9 hours

RhetoricalAnalysisRubricSpring2018.docx

Home >English homework help >i need someone to write me a english rhetorical analysis essay (6 pages) and i need it in 9 hours

Categories	Excellent (A)	Effective (B)	Adequate (C)	Developing (D)
Invention and Purpose	Provides exceptional detail, depth, and clarity about each author’s ethos and the effects of a few other specific rhetorical elements of three articles from sources with different slants; interesting, sophisticated analysis develops through the paper	Provides solid detail, depth, and clarity about each author’s ethos and the effects of a few other specific rhetorical elements of three recent articles from sources with different slants; solid analysis develops as the paper progresses	Provides some detail and clarity about the effects of each author’s ethos and the effects of a few other specific rhetorical elements of three recent articles from sources with different slants; consistent analysis	Provides little detail, depth, or clarity about the author’s ethos and the effects of other rhetorical elements; may use terms inaccurately or may not analyze recent articles from sources with different slants; confusing or incomplete analysis
Arrangement and Audience Awareness	Arrangement enhances the central idea; intro intrigues readers, provides helpful context, and prepares readers well; sophisticated transitions guide readers; conclusion refines thesis, provides a satisfying resolution	Arrangement supports the central idea and its development; intro provides context and prepares readers well; effective transitions guide readers; conclusion recasts thesis and provides a satisfying resolution	Arrangement mostly supports the central idea; intro provides limited context or reader preparation; transitions formulaic or not always effective; conclusion merely repeats thesis or provides little resolution	Arrangement doesn’t consistently support the central idea; intro provides little context or reader preparation; transitions missing or ineffective; relationship among ideas unclear; conclusion off-topic or underdeveloped
Ethos and Evidence	Evidence and overall content easily convince the reader that the author is credible and that the analysis is valid; evidence enhances writer’s claims	Evidence and overall content convince the reader that the author is credible and that the analysis is valid; evidence supports writer’s claims	Evidence and overall content somewhat convince the reader that that the author is credible and that the analysis is valid; evidence mostly supports claims	Evidence and overall content do not fully convince the reader that the author is credible and/or that the analysis is valid; evidence only somewhat supports writer’s claims

Style and Conventions	Graceful language; exceptional control of standard writing and citation conventions appropriate to audience and genre; quotations seamlessly integrated into writer’s own sentences; very few errors	Control of writing and citation conventions for this audience and genre; quotations integrated into writer’s own sentences; few errors don’t significantly impede readability	Some control of writing and/or citation conventions for this audience and genre; quotations sometimes integrated into writer’s sentences/ some dropped-in quotes; errors frequent and/or impede readability	Little control of writing and/or citation conventions for this audience and genre; quotations may not be integrated into writer’s sentences or may be excessive; frequent errors significantly impede readability
Delivery	Attractive, easy-to-read document meets format/ length expectations	Functional, easy-to-read document meets format and length expectations	Document only somewhat easy to read and/or meets some format and length expectations	Document may not be easy to read or may meet few format or length expectations
Post Write	Revision choices carefully explained; questions answered in full detail; exceptional reflection on the writing process and product	Revision choices explained; questions answered fully; thoughtful reflection on the writing process and product	Some revision choices explained; questions answered perfunctorily; some reflection on the writing process and product	Few revision choices explained; some questions answered; includes minimal reflection on the writing process and product
Comments

Scoring Guide for Rhetorical Analysis (15% of grade; 150 points)

The scoring guide helps you and your instructor see some of the specific ways your writing is matching expectations. No rubric can encompass everything a piece of writing can or needs to accomplish, so your instructor will comment both about and beyond these categories to help you understand how this piece of writing is effective and how it (or future pieces) could be more effective. Your grade will be determined by your instructor’s overall evaluation of this piece of writing and the revision process it enjoyed, with the top three categories carrying more weight than the bottom three. Note: If for any category, the piece does not meet “Developing” standards, your instructor will assign no credit for that category.

KHO/17