Revision Milestone two feed back and 6-1 journal feddback
Milestone two feed back
Note:READ ENTIRE TEMPLATE DIRECTIONS BEFORE FILLING IN TEMPLATE
Do NOT delete anything from this template
|
Submission Feedback |
|
|
Only the template provided in the weekly announcements is eligible for resubmission. |
Introduction: Data: Key Features
Describes key features of data set and assesses how features affect analysis, but response contains inaccuracies or omits key details.
Introduction: Data: Limitations
Analyzes limitations of data set and how those affect findings, but does not justify response, response contains inaccuracies, or justification is illogical
Summary Statistics Calculations
Does not include a table with appropriate and accurate summary statistics of the data set
Feedback for 6-1 Journal: Article Methods
This is a fair submission. A several areas could be addressed, however. If you wish to resubmit, please do so after correcting all prior journal submissions, if needed. Prompt:
The template is all that is necessary. Course Concepts:
Statistical methods are not correctly identified, and this issue carries through the submission.
The similarities do no mention statistical methods.
The differences are unclear.
The strength of the second article is not a strength.
The weaknesses are not thoroughly answered.
Personal or Professional Situation:
The last question is not appropriately answered. Articulation of Response:
Errors in the writing affect the quality of the work.
Prompt
Meets only some of the elements in the prompt Relates course concepts to the
Course Concepts
applicable journal prompt, but response lacks clarity
Personal or Professional Situation
Supports ideas and observations with examples from personal or professional circumstances or experiences, but response lacks logic
Articulation of Response
Journal assignment contains errors of organization and grammar, but they are limited enough so that assignment can be understood and APA usage is consistently incorrect
Feedback
Errors in the writing affect the quality of the work.