Revision Milestone two feed back and 6-1 journal feddback

profileJambo
RevisionMilestonetwofeedbackand6-1journalfeddback.docx

Milestone two feed back

Note:READ ENTIRE TEMPLATE DIRECTIONS BEFORE FILLING IN TEMPLATE

Do NOT delete anything from this template

Submission Feedback

Only the template provided in the weekly announcements is eligible for resubmission.

Introduction: Data: Key Features

Describes key features of data set and assesses how features affect analysis, but response contains inaccuracies or omits key details.

Introduction: Data: Limitations

Analyzes limitations of data set and how those affect findings, but does not justify response, response contains inaccuracies, or justification is illogical

Summary Statistics Calculations

Does not include a table with appropriate and accurate summary statistics of the data set

Feedback for 6-1 Journal: Article Methods

 This is a fair submission. A several areas could be addressed, however. If you wish to resubmit, please do so after correcting all prior journal submissions, if needed. Prompt:

The template is all that is necessary. Course Concepts:

Statistical methods are not correctly identified, and this issue carries through the submission.

The similarities do no mention statistical methods.

The differences are unclear.

The strength of the second article is not a strength.

The weaknesses are not thoroughly answered.

Personal or Professional Situation:

The last question is not appropriately answered. Articulation of Response:

Errors in the writing affect the quality of the work.

Prompt

Meets only some of the elements in the prompt Relates course concepts to the

Course Concepts

applicable journal prompt, but response lacks clarity

Personal or Professional Situation

Supports ideas and observations with examples from personal or professional circumstances or experiences, but response lacks logic

Articulation of Response

Journal assignment contains errors of organization and grammar, but they are limited enough so that assignment can be understood and APA usage is consistently incorrect

Feedback

Errors in the writing affect the quality of the work.