| Rubric Elements for an Economics Research Paper |
| Economics Assignment-Specific Elements |
| | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Statement of Purpose/ Topic | Purpose/topic is inadequately communicated with little or no context provided | | Purpose/topic is adequately communicated with some context provided | | Purpose/topic is clearly communicated and placed in larger context |
| | Literature is inadequately reviewed with little or no synthesis | | Literature is adequately reviewed with some synthesis | | Literature is thoroughly reviewed and synthesized |
| Literature Review and Use of Sources | Sources are inadequately described, cited, and evaluated | | Sources are adequately described, cited, and evaluated | | Sources are clearly and concisely described, cited and evaluated |
| | Inadequate quantity and quality of sources | | Adequate quantity and quality of sources | | Superior quantity and quality of sources |
| | Lacks attention to validity of evidence and fails to present alternative perspectives | | Adequate attention to validity of evidence and presentation of alternative perspectives | | Superior attention to validity of evidence and presentation of alternative perspectives |
| | Applies economic thinking superficially, or inadequately, or not at all | | Applies economic thinking with some consistency and depth | | Applies economic thinking insightfully and thoroughly |
| Theory, Modeling and Hypotheses | Assumptions not well grounded in basic economic theory | | Assumptions generally grounded in basic economic theory | | Assumptions solidly grounded in basic economic theory |
| | Hypotheses not consistent with theory and literature | | Hypotheses generally consistent with theory and literature | | Hypotheses fully consistent with theory and literature |
| | Significant miscalculations or errors undermine the results | | Enough miscalculations or errors to weaken the results | | Calculations are completely correct and support the results |
| Results & Discussion | Inadequate or incorrect explanation of results | | Adequate explanation of results, but some minor errors remain | | Exemplary and correct explanation of all results |
| | Lack of contribution to debate on topic | | Contributes to debate on topic | | Significantly contributes to debate on topic |
| Comments: |