Annotated Webliography

Website Review

225-202.5 points

202.5-180 points

179-156.5 points

155.5-133 points

132-0 points

25 points

Student submitted at least five websites

Student submitted at least 4 websites

Student submitted at least 3 websites  

Student submitted at least 2 websites    

Student submitted   0-1 websites    

50 points

All 5 website descriptions contain a complete and correct bibliographic entry per the Chicago Manual of Style

There are 5 website descriptions that contain a bibliographic entry per the Chicago Manual of Style, but there are 1-3 errors

Website descriptions contain bibliographic entries per the Chicago Manual of Style, but there are 4-5 errors

OR

1-2 bibliographic entries are missing are missing

OR

Descriptions contain a complete and correct bibliographic entry in a citation style other than Chicago Manual.

Website descriptions contains bibliographic entries per the Chicago Manual of Style, but there are 6-8 errors.

OR

3 bibliographic entries are missing

OR

Descriptions contain bibliographic entries in a citation style other than Chicago, but there are errors

Website descriptions contains bibliographic entries per the Chicago Manual of Style, but there are 9 or more errors. OR 4-5 bibliographic entries are missing

100 points

Student wrote a clear and complete description analysis of the web resource using all four of the evaluation criteria

Student’s application of the criteria is logical and free of analytical errors      

Student wrote a clear and complete description analysis of the web resource using all four of the evaluation criteria, but there are 1-2 errors in the application of the criteria or student’s logic      

Student wrote a clear and complete description analysis of the web resource using all four of the evaluation criteria, but there are 3-5 errors in the application of the criteria or student’s logic

OR

Student failed to utilize and address 1-2 evaluation criteria

Student wrote a clear and complete description analysis of the web resource using all four of the evaluation criteria, but there are 6-7 errors in the application of the criteria or the student’s logic

OR

Student failed to utilize and address 3 evaluation criteria.

OR

Student’s analysis is unclear, inconclusive or incoherent

Student’s analysis contains 8 or more errors in the application of the criteria or the student’s logic OR

Fails to evaluate web resources according to required criteria

25 points

Student clearly identifies whether each of the 5 required websites are/are not suitable for academic use

Student clearly identifies whether 4 websites are/are not suitable for academic use

Student clearly identifies whether 3 websites are/are not  suitable for academic use

Student clearly identifies whether 2 websites are/are not suitable for academic use

Student only identified 0-1 website is/is not suitable for academic use

50 points

Writing is excellent, sentences are well constructed, spelling and grammar correct with 0-2 errors in grammar, spelling, word choice or punctuation    

Writing is solid, sentences are well constructed, with 3-4 errors in grammar, spelling, word choice or punctuation    

Writing is acceptable, sentences are generally well constructed, and generally correct with 5-6 errors in grammar, spelling, word choice or punctuation    

Writing needs improvement, sentences are not well constructed and contain 7-8 errors in grammar, spelling, word choice or punctuation    

Writing is unsatisfactory, sentences are poorly and contain 9 or more errors in grammar, spelling, word choice or punctuation