3 pages Annotated Bibliography

profileVincent666
RevisedAnnotatedBibliographyRubric.xls

Sheet1

Annotated Bibliography Rubric
90-100 80-89 70-79 60-69 below 60
Content Content reflects a superior choice of Content reflects a very good selection of sources that Content reflects a general understanding of the process. Content uses few variations in Project fails to fulfill
academically appropriate sources, a mix are generally an effective mix of primary and secondary sources. Sources are varied but sometimes seem repetitive sources. The responses are not criteria for accepted
of primary and secondary sources, and An understanding of the process is evident with a few errors. appropriate for an academic content. Sources are
an appropriate and original title. A depth The title is original, and the three questions are correctly and responses to the four questions are Responses are sometimes vague or missing. exercise. The title is not original, not approved; the
of understanding of the process and outcome well-developed. or it is missing. four questions are not considered.
is evident in the work. There are scant errors. No title is present.
The response to the three questions is uniformly four questions is generally tions is
superior.
Technical Technique is superior with no or few errors in Technique has few errors that are not repeated. Technique haze several errors of spelling, word choce, has several errors Technique shows major Technique does not
spelling, word choice, or sentence structure. in sentence structure, spelling or word choice. errors in use of English. reflect a college-level
writing ability. Writing errors are
often distracting.
Organization MLA style is followed carefully with virtually no MLA style is followed for the most part with a few Numerous errors in the MLA style are evident. Organization shows scant understanding little Organization is missing
errors. errors in source citation. understanding of the MLA from the assignment.
style for source citation. No MLA style is evident.