scientific collection question
Week 7: Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of Results, and Conclusion
-
Purpose
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete their MSN EBP proposal. This assignment includes the final sections of the proposal which are data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion.
-
-
Requirements
Description of the Assignment
For this assignment, the student will complete MSN EBP project proposal by including the final sections of data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion.
Criteria for Content
-
The final sections of the proposal (data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results and conclusion) should be a maximum of 15 pages. Points will be lost for exceeding this length requirement.
-
Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference pages must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
-
The paper should be presented in the following ordered sections:
-
Title Page
-
Data collection
-
Analysis
-
Evaluation
-
Dissemination of Results
-
Conclusion
-
References
4. Data Collection: In this section, students provide a comprehensive and detailed description regarding how data are to be collected. The required content includes:
A. For quantitative design the required content includes:
-
Restate the PICO/PICo question
-
Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
-
Identify the data collection points
-
Explain the length of time for data collection
-
Explain all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic)
-
Describe 2 (two) methods that will be useful in enhancing data quality
-
Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
B. For qualitative design the required content includes:
-
Restate the PICO/PICo question
-
Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts)
-
Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
-
Explain the data collection points
-
Explain the length of time for data collection
-
Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation
-
Describe 2 (two) methods that would be used to enhance data quality
-
Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
-
Analysis: In this section, students provide a detailed explanation on how data will be analyzed.
-
For quantitative data the required content includes:
-
Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal
-
Describe one type of inferential statistics and their use in this EBP proposal
-
Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis
-
For qualitative data the required content includes:
-
Explain how data analysis is organized
-
Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal
-
Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design
-
Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis
-
Evaluation: In this section, students will present information regarding methods useful to objectively determine if outcomes from implementing this proposed EBP proposal would be positive for stakeholders as well as the nursing practice area reflected in their specialty track. The required content includes:
-
Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project
-
Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
-
Dissemination of Results: In this section, students will identify specific methods that may be used to share the results from successful implementation of this EBP proposal. The required content includes:
-
Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders
-
Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
-
Conclusion: In this section, the student will identify a summary of their EBP project as well as consider the potential contribution to their specialty track practice setting. The required content includes:
-
Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project
-
Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting
-
8. Preparing the Assignment
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
-
The final sections of the proposal (data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results and conclusion) should be a maximum of 15 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting this length requirement.
-
Headings are required and listed in above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements
-
Title page, body of paper, reference page(s), and appendix must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual.
-
Provide all of your references; formatted in APA style, as reference page(s).
-
Directions and Assignment Criteria
|
Assignment Criteria |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Data Collection
|
35 |
23 |
The required content for this section includes: A. For quantitative design the required content includes:
B. For qualitative design the required content includes:
|
|
Analysis
|
25 |
17 |
The required content for this section includes:
|
|
Evaluation
|
20 |
13 |
The required content for this section includes:
|
|
Dissemination of Results |
20 |
13 |
The required content for this section includes:
|
|
Conclusion |
10 |
7 |
The required content for this section includes:
|
|
Paper Specifications |
10 |
7 |
|
|
APA Format (6th edition) |
10 |
7 |
|
|
Citations in Text |
10 |
7 |
|
|
Writing Mechanics |
10 |
7 |
|
|
Total |
150 |
100 % |
|
-
Grading Rubric
|
Assignment Criteria |
Exceptional 100% Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds 88% Very good or high level of performance |
Meets 80% Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement 38% Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing 0% Unsatisfactory level of performance |
|
Content Possible Points = 115 Points |
|||||
|
Data Collection |
35 Points |
31 Points |
28 Points |
13 Points |
0 Points |
|
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: For quantitative design the required content includes:
For qualitative design the required content includes:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: For quantitative design the required content includes:
For qualitative design the required content includes:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements For quantitative design the required content includes:
For qualitative design the required content includes:
|
Presentation of information in one or two of the following elements fails to meet expectations: For quantitative design the required content includes:
For qualitative design the required content includes:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements: For quantitative design the required content includes:
For qualitative design the required content includes:
|
|
|
Analysis
|
25 Points |
22 Points |
20 Points |
10 Points |
0 Points |
|
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes:
For qualitative data the required content includes:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes:
For qualitative data the required content includes:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes:
For qualitative data the required content includes:
|
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations: For quantitative data the required content includes:
For qualitative data the required content includes:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two or more of the following elements: For quantitative data the required content includes:
For qualitative data the required content includes:
Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data analysis |
|
|
Evaluation
|
20 Points |
18 Points |
16 Points |
8 Points |
0 Points |
|
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
|
|
Dissemination of Results |
20 Points |
18 Points |
16 Points |
8 Points |
0 Points |
|
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
|
|
Conclusion |
10 Points |
9 Points |
8 Points |
4 Points |
0 Points |
|
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information in one of the following elements fails to meet expectations:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
|
|
Paper Specifications |
10 Points |
9 Points |
8 Points |
4 Points |
0 Points |
|
This section included all of the following:
A dictionary (except for Definition section), required textbooks for this course and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information, may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment.
|
This section included three of the following:
|
This section included only two of the following:
|
This section included only one of the following:
|
This section included none of the following:
|
|
|
Format Possible Points = 35 Points |
|||||
|
APA Style |
10 Points |
9 Points |
8 Points |
4 Points |
0 Points |
|
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
reference page
0 to 1 APA error was present |
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
reference page
2 - 3 APA errors were present |
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
reference page
4 – 5 APA were are present |
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
reference page
6 – 7 APA were are present |
APA guidelines, as per the 6th edition of the manual, are demonstrated for the
reference page
8 or greater APA errors were present |
|
|
Citations |
10 Points |
9 Points |
8 Points |
4 Points |
0 Points |
|
There were 0-1 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
|
There were 2-3 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
|
There were 4-5 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge
|
There were 6-7 errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge |
There were 8 or greater errors in the crediting of ideas, and information that contributed to knowledge |
|
|
Writing Quality |
10 Points |
9 Points |
8 Points |
4 Points |
0 Points |
|
1–2 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual |
3 – 4 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
|
5 – 6 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
|
7 – 8 errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
|
9 or greater errors or exceptions to the rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation and other aspects of formal written work as found in the 6th edition of the APA manual
|
|
|
Total Points |
_____of 150 points |
||||
W7 Assignment Data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination, conclusion Rev. 7/31/2017 (AR) Rev. 1/10/18 (AR), Rev. 4/26/18 (JP)
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice
W6 Assignment Completing the MSN EBP Proposal Rev. 7/31/2017 (AR)
Chamberlain College of Nursing NR505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidenced Based Practice
W6 Assignment Completing the MSN EBP Proposal Rev. 7/31/2017 (AR) Rev 4/26/18 (JP)