5-2 Milestone Three: Applying the APA Code of Ethics

PSY 570 Final Project Milestone Two Rubric Activity: 3-2 Milestone Two: Case Study Analysis Outline

Course: PSY-570-X5305 Ethical Practice in Psych 23TW5

Name: Sule Umit

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Working Title 10 / 10

Criterion Feedback

Good working title.

10 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and working

title demonstrates

creativity

9 points

Includes a working

title for the case

study analysis

7 points

Includes a working

title for the case

study analysis, but

working title is not in

alignment with the

case study

0 points

Does not include a

working title for the

case study analysis

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Case Study Analysis

Abstract

14 / 20

Criterion Feedback

Nice work on your abstract. Make sure to include how the case will be analyzed within your paper, such as using the APA Code of Ethics..

Detailed Case

Study Analysis

Description

27 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Good summary. You mentioned another stakeholder. Who is this and why are they important?

20 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and abstract

is the appropriate

length

18 points

Includes a draft of the

case study analysis

abstract that

describes both the

case study vignette

and the approach to

analyzing the case

study

14 points

Includes a draft of

the case study

analysis abstract but

does not describe

both case study

vignette and

approach to

analyzing case study

0 points

Does not include a

case study analysis

abstract

30 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and explains

approach to analyzing

case study

27 points

Summarizes the

chosen scenario, the

important people,

and the important

interactions present

in the case study

21 points

Summarizes the

chosen scenario, the

important people,

and the important

interactions present

in the case study, but

is lacking in detail or

breadth

0 points

Does not summarize

the chosen scenario,

the important people,

and the important

interactions present

in the case study

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

The Ethical Conflict 30 / 30

Criterion Feedback

Excellent:

Therefore, completing disability for Ms. Malfunction to get insurance payment will be contrary to her professional

finding and will be going against her conscience as it will compromise her professional integrity. She is a therapist

in this case and cannot act as an expert witness to avoid multiple role relationship conflicts.

APA Writing 4.5 / 5

Criterion Feedback

Formatting errors in reference list. Review for errors in your paper.

30 points

Meets “Proficient”

criteria and identifies

a strategy for

resolving the central

ethical conflict

27 points

Examines central

ethical conflict of

case study and

assesses interactions

between different

roles in the scenario

21 points

Examines central

ethical conflict of

case study and

assesses interactions

between different

roles in the scenario,

but assessment lacks

depth or detail

0 points

Does not examine

central ethical

conflict of case study

or assess interaction

between different

roles in the scenario

5 points

No errors related to

APA style or citations

4.5 points

Few errors related to

related to APA style

and citations

3.5 points

Major errors related

to APA style and

citations

0 points

Critical errors related

to APA style and

citations

Total 90.5 / 100

Overall Score

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Not Evident Criterion Score

Articulation of

Response

5 / 55 points

Submission is free of

errors related to

grammar, spelling,

syntax, and

organization and is

presented in a

professional and easy

to read format with

language that is

appropriate to the

intended audience

4.5 points

Submission has no

major errors related

to grammar, spelling,

syntax, organization

or audience-

appropriate

terminology

3.5 points

Submission has major

errors related to

grammar, spelling,

syntax, organization,

or audience-

appropriate language

that negatively

impact readability

and articulation of

main ideas

0 points

Submission has

critical errors related

to grammar, spelling,

syntax, organization,

or audience-specific

language that prevent

understanding of

ideas

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 91

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 71

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 1

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.

Points earned out of 100 The overall submission earned 0

points or more. Final calculation of

grades can be found in the

gradebook.