Human Nutrition

You will have to read and evaluate the work of your two classmates and write feedback. While

you will formally assign a 'grade', the most important part is

your comments

. Students benefit

from pe

er reviews because they get feedback from several fellow students and because they

read other students' submissions and think about both the work they evaluate and their own

work.

You will have to evaluate submissions of your two peers, fill out the

Rubric,

AND write

your

feedback in the Comments box

.

1.

Open the assigned submission (one a

t the time).

2.

Read and evaluate the work.

3.

Evaluate

based on the

rubic

below fill out each one and

Assign the numbers.

If you do not

give full credit for an item explain your reason in the 'Ratings' area of the rubric. You can

share your thoughts even if you gave the highest score.

Write comments

(when

appropriate)

-

IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Please do NOT copy and paste t

ext from the rubric

4.

Wr

ite your feedback

.

Reflect on the submission, explain what you liked or did not like and

why. Discuss how the submission could be improved. Explain the reason for your grade.

The feedback does not have to be long. It should be suffici

ent for the author to understand

what you think about their work and provide suggestions for improvement (if any). Please

exercise constructive criticism and try to be positive. Think what kind of feedback YOU

would like to receive. Any thoughts about the

submission are welcome.

Assessing Reliable Sources

-

1

1. Provides thorough review of THREE nutrition

-

related websites. The choice of websites is

appropriate. Assesses reliability of websites using the "W" questions, and assigns a rating of 1

-

10. Evaluation is justified. URL is provided for each website. Well

organized, uses original and

critical thought.

/ 30 pts

2. Provides thorough review of credentials for TWO nutrition experts. Appropriately assesses

credibility of nutrition experts using criteria from Health Connection 1. Reference for each

expert is prov

ided. Well organized, uses original and critical thought.

/ 10 pts

3. Uses appropriate English grammar, sentence structure, with no errors in spelling,

punctuation, and capitalization. Assignment is properly formatted

-

title, Reference List,

paragraph str

ucture, appropriate font, etc.

/ 4 pts

4. Reviews 2 submissions by other students, fills out the rubric, writes thoughtful feedback.

Comments are well organized, critical thought is used. Uses appropriate English grammar. 3

points for each review.

/ 6 pts

Total Points: 0

out of

44

You will have to read and evaluate the work of your two classmates and write feedback. While

you will formally assign a 'grade', the most important part is your comments. Students benefit

from peer reviews because they get feedback from several fellow students and because they

read other students' submissions and think about both the work they evaluate and their own

work.

You will have to evaluate submissions of your two peers, fill out the Rubric, AND write

your feedback in the Comments box.

1. Open the assigned submission (one at the time).

2. Read and evaluate the work.

3. Evaluate based on the rubic below fill out each one and Assign the numbers. If you do not

give full credit for an item explain your reason in the 'Ratings' area of the rubric. You can

share your thoughts even if you gave the highest score. Write comments (when

appropriate) - IN YOUR OWN WORDS. Please do NOT copy and paste text from the rubric

4. Write your feedback. Reflect on the submission, explain what you liked or did not like and

why. Discuss how the submission could be improved. Explain the reason for your grade.

The feedback does not have to be long. It should be sufficient for the author to understand

what you think about their work and provide suggestions for improvement (if any). Please

exercise constructive criticism and try to be positive. Think what kind of feedback YOU

would like to receive. Any thoughts about the submission are welcome.

Assessing Reliable Sources-1

1. Provides thorough review of THREE nutrition-related websites. The choice of websites is

appropriate. Assesses reliability of websites using the "W" questions, and assigns a rating of 1-

10. Evaluation is justified. URL is provided for each website. Well organized, uses original and

critical thought.

/ 30 pts

2. Provides thorough review of credentials for TWO nutrition experts. Appropriately assesses

credibility of nutrition experts using criteria from Health Connection 1. Reference for each

expert is provided. Well organized, uses original and critical thought.

/ 10 pts

3. Uses appropriate English grammar, sentence structure, with no errors in spelling,

punctuation, and capitalization. Assignment is properly formatted - title, Reference List,

paragraph structure, appropriate font, etc.

/ 4 pts

4. Reviews 2 submissions by other students, fills out the rubric, writes thoughtful feedback.

Comments are well organized, critical thought is used. Uses appropriate English grammar. 3

points for each review.

/ 6 pts

Total Points: 0 out of 44