Professional Context

8/11/22, 10:35 PM Reviewing the Literature Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/DHA/DHA8008/220700/Scoring_Guides/u05a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1

Reviewing the Literature Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Unit 5 Percentage of Course Grade: 20%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Summarize findings from the literature on the effects of legislation on the scope, access to, availability of, and reimbursement for health care services.

18%

Does not summarize findings from the literature on the effects of legislation on the scope, access to, availability of, and reimbursement for health care services.

Provides a summary that reflects a superficial or incomplete appraisal of the literature with respect to the effects of legislation on the scope, access to, availability of, and reimbursement for health care services.

Summarizes findings from the literature on the effects of legislation on the scope, access to, availability of, and reimbursement for health care services.

Summarizes findings from the literature on the effects of legislation on the scope, access to, availability of, and reimbursement for health care services. Synthesizes the results of a critical appraisal of the literature into an insightful summary of what is known and what is not and identifies areas of disagreement or controversy among researchers.

Analyze the effects of at least one piece of legislation on health care access, cost, and/or quality.

18%

Does not describe the effects of any legislation on health care access, cost, or quality.

Describes the effects of at least one piece of legislation on health care access, cost, and/or quality.

Analyzes the effects of at least one piece of legislation on health care access, cost, and/or quality.

Provides an astute analysis of the effects of at least one piece of legislation on health care access, cost, and/or quality, supported by an accurate, unbiased interpretation of the legislation and clearly articulated cause-and-effect relationships.

Articulate underlying assumptions, values, and biases in the literature.

18%

Does not articulate underlying assumptions, values, or biases in the literature.

Provides a cursory description of underlying assumptions, values, and biases derived from a superficial appraisal of the literature.

Articulates underlying assumptions, values, and biases in the literature.

Articulates underlying assumptions, values, and biases in the literature. Assesses the validity or legitimacy of an argument and acknowledges the limitations of one’s own perspective.

Identify current health care policy gaps.

18%

Does not identify current health care policy gaps.

Identifies non- existent or unsubstantiated health care policy gaps.

Identifies current health care policy gaps.

Identifies current health care policy gaps that are substantiated by a critical, thorough appraisal and synthesis of the best available evidence.

Evaluate the effectiveness of specific legislation in closing current health care policy gaps.

18%

Does not describe the intent of specific legislation to close current health care policy gaps.

Describes the intent of specific legislation to close current health care policy gaps.

Evaluates the effectiveness of specific legislation in closing current health care policy gaps.

Evaluates the effectiveness of specific legislation in closing current gaps in health care policy. Applies relevant, measurable criteria to the assessment, and draws rational, fully justified conclusions from an insightful synthesis and interpretation of the evidence.

Write clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

10%

Does not write. Writes without clarity, concision, and/or a logical structure, inhibiting effective communication and detracting from good scholarship.

Writes clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.

Writes clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style. Main points, ideas, arguments, or propositions are well- developed and engaging. Adheres to all applicable disciplinary and scholarly writing standards.