conclusion, summary and recommendations.
MUSIC AND DEPRESSION 2
Section 4: Results and Findings
Descriptive quantitative data
Results to the demographics
Results obtained below indicates that several participants in this study are male with a percentage of 85, followed by females (15%).
Table 1 Gender
|
Gender |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
|
Valid |
Male |
85 |
85.0 |
85.0 |
85.0 |
|
|
Female |
15 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
Total |
100 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
In the table below, it can be seen that the highest percentage belongs to 29-39 years of age (35%), followed by 18-28 years (28%), 40-50 years (22%), and 51 years and above (15%).
Table 2 Age
|
Age |
|||||
|
|
Frequency |
Percent |
Valid Percent |
Cumulative Percent |
|
|
Valid |
18 to 28 years |
28 |
28.0 |
28.0 |
28.0 |
|
|
29 to 39 years |
35 |
35.0 |
35.0 |
63.0 |
|
|
40 to 50 years |
22 |
22.0 |
22.0 |
85.0 |
|
|
51 and above years |
15 |
15.0 |
15.0 |
100.0 |
|
|
Total |
100 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
|
Results to hypotheses
The first hypothesis investigated was:
H1 – Music has a positive impact on the reduction in depression.
Table 3 Results to the first hypothesis
|
Model Summary |
||||
|
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. The error of the Estimate |
|
1 |
.789a |
.623 |
.619 |
.40403 |
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), Music |
In the table above, the percentage of R-square is 62.3%, due to which it can be argued that Music can be used for predicting the value of depression. When R-square is more than 40%, it means that the variable perfectly fits the model.
|
ANOVA |
||||||
|
Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
|
1 |
Regression |
26.429 |
1 |
26.429 |
161.909 |
.000b |
|
|
Residual |
15.997 |
98 |
.163 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
42.427 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: ReductionInDepression |
||||||
|
b. Predictors: (Constant), Music |
ANOVA table helps understand the hypothesis and accept or reject it. When F's value is more significant than one and significantly less than 0.05, the idea is born. The value of significance in the table above is 0.000, based on which first hypothesis has been received.
|
Coefficients |
||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
|
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
|
|
|
|
1 |
(Constant) |
.423 |
.156 |
|
2.707 |
.008 |
|
|
Music |
.847 |
.067 |
.789 |
12.724 |
.000 |
|
a. Dependent Variable: ReductionInDepression |
The table of coefficients identifies whether there is a positive or negative relationship between the variables. The value of t is equivalent to 12.724. Hence, Music decreases depression by 12.724 times. Beta is 78.9%. Therefore Music is directly and positively associated with a reduction in depression.
Results to the second hypothesis
The second hypothesis investigated was:
H2 – Music therapy results in a reduction in depression.
Table 4 results to the second hypothesis
|
Model Summary |
||||
|
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. The error of the Estimate |
|
1 |
.461a |
.213 |
.205 |
.58383 |
|
a. Predictors: (Constant), music therapy |
In the table above, R-square is 21.3%. Hence music therapy moderately fits into the model.
|
ANOVA |
||||||
|
Model |
Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
Sig. |
|
|
1 |
Regression |
9.022 |
1 |
9.022 |
26.469 |
.000b |
|
|
Residual |
33.404 |
98 |
.341 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
42.427 |
99 |
|
|
|
|
a. Dependent Variable: ReductionInDepression |
||||||
|
b. Predictors: (Constant), music therapy |
Music therapy helps reduce depression because the value of significance is less than 0.05 and F is greater than 1. Therefore, the hypothesis has been accepted.
|
Coefficients |
||||||
|
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
t |
Sig. |
||
|
|
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
|
|
|
|
1 |
(Constant) |
1.067 |
.255 |
|
4.176 |
.000 |
|
|
MusicTherapy |
.582 |
.113 |
.461 |
5.145 |
.000 |
|
a. Dependent Variable: ReductionInDepression |
A coefficient value above indicates that t is positive and high, with a value of 5.145. based on the value of t, music therapy can reduce depression by 5.145 times. Similarly, Beta's value is positive and equivalent to 46.1%, based on which music therapy increases the chances of depression reduction by 46.1%.
Summary of hypotheses
The summary of hypotheses results can be seen below:
Table 5 Summary of Hypotheses
|
S.no |
Hypotheses |
Status |
|
1 |
H1 – Music has a positive impact on the reduction in depression. |
Accepted |
|
2 |
H2 – Music therapy results in a reduction in depression. |
Accepted |
Discussion
In this investigation, the aim was to find out the role of Music in treating depression. For this reason, two hypotheses were deployed, and a quantitative approach was adopted. The results helped me understand that Music is a good tool for treating depression because it reported positive music outcomes. Similar results were obtained by the study of Steward et al. (2019), arguing that Music plays a vital role in treating depression because it allows a person to slowly engage and forget about his past. However, they also argued that it takes time. These results are highly relevant to ancient studies in different nations because they also regarded Music as one of the best tools for treating depression.
One more hypothesis tested in this study was related to music therapy and its role in depression reduction. The findings are in support of the statement that music therapy moderately heals depression. The value of significance in the second hypothesis is also less than 0.05; hence theory is accepted. The results obtained are similar to Tang et al. (2020) and Gotell (2018), who argued that many nations use music therapies for reducing depression. However, Garrido et al. (2017) argued that many countries still face issues in developing effective music therapies, due to which their Music does not help in healing depression. Therefore, it can be summarised that music therapy is good for treating depression. However, it should be good.
Ethical considerations
Before carrying out this investigation, the mutual consent form was obtained from the respondents. Only the ones willing to participate were provided, and no one was forced. The results were not used for any other purpose except for generating the results of this investigation.
Limitations and implications
This study had a limited number of respondents. This study was only carried out locally, and international people suffering from depression were not involved. The sample size was small (100) even when many people suffering from depression issues are many. This investigation can be beneficial for music developers and psychologists to develop Music for healing depressed people. With this investigation's help, the government and clinics would create more effective Music to treat depressed people.
References
Garrido, S., Eerola, T., &McFerran, K. (2017). Group rumination: Social interactions around Music in people with depression. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 490.
Stewart, J., Garrido, S., Hense, C., &McFerran, K. (2019). Music used for mood regulation: Self-awareness and conscious listening choices in young people with tendencies to depression. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 1199.
Tang, Q., Huang, Z., Zhou, H., & Ye, P. (2020). Effects of music therapy on depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PloS one, 15(11), e0240862.