Psychology Assignment 5
nikkieramsey
Resubmissionneededforcompletion.docx2
Online versus In-Person Counseling: A Review of Existing Studies
Martha Ramsey
Saint Leo University
Capsthesis/Capstone Project II: PSY 695
Instructor Lara Ault
March 17, 2024
Abstract
Online psychotherapy and in-person counseling differ with respect to their effectiveness. The current study was guided by a set of research questions which were considered in its review approach. The search for the articles was restricted to the following search terms and phrases, online therapy mental health outcomes, telepsychiatry effectiveness, internet-based interventions for mental health, and the advantages and disadvantages of online counseling. The search was confined to English language articles published in the year 2019 to the year 2024. The chosen time frame coincided with the period of the COVID19 pandemic. This also marked the period when the use of online psychotherapy became common place due to lockdowns and restricted movements. The subjects in the articles were those that had participated in online psychotherapy. A total of 15 peer-reviewed sources were selected for the review after consideration of various criteria. The selected articles not only met the criteria, but also satisfied the requirements for research subjects, method, variables, and research outcomes. The findings of the study established that in-person counseling was favored for effectiveness while online psychotherapy was favored for convenience and affordability.
Online versus In-Person Counseling: A Review of Existing Studies
Background
With the advancement in internet and digital technology, access to critical services such as healthcare and support services has become easier (Greenwood et al., 2022). The proliferation of internet technology and online communication has enabled accessibility to several health services. Mental health services remain among the healthcare services that can be accessed through online interaction with experts (Khan et al., 2021). However, the question as to whether online counseling is more effective compared to in-person counseling widely remained answered. Whereas online counseling can equally impact patients in reducing psychological distresses, its effectiveness in terms of creating personal connections with the therapists, increasing level of satisfaction after use, being executed devoid of distractions remain areas of concern (Békés et al., 2021). Online counseling therapy has always been associated with ease of access and affordability thereby making it considered by patients who give preferences to these factors (Ierardi et al., 2022). Renn et al. (2019) opine that barriers such as location of counseling services, stigma, and time commitment make some patients prefer online or digital psychotherapy to in-person counseling (Renn et al., 2019).
Problem Statement: The use of online counseling and therapy versus in-person counseling in terms of effectiveness widely remains unexplored with respect to review of the existing studies.
Purpose of the Review: The current narrative review provides an in-depth analysis of current literature on the effectiveness of internet-based therapy compared to in-person counseling and therapy. The review provides information that can help patients and mental healthcare professionals make informed decisions when using these approaches to counseling and therapy. The selected articles for the review contained subjects who had used both online psychotherapy and in-person counseling. These selected articles provided information that was used in the comparison of the types of counseling in terms of their effectiveness.
Research Questions
1. How effective is online psychotherapy in terms of client satisfaction and personal interaction as compared to traditional in-person therapy?
2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of online therapy?
3. How is online therapy is perceived either negatively or positively by the young and old demographics?
Method
1. Selection Criteria
English language criterion for journalism was considered a critical component in the selection criteria. English language use was a key consideration because studies and papers published in non-English languages were not only challenging to comprehend and synthesize but could also comprise the rigor of the review. The researcher restricted the criteria to peer-reviewed articles published between the year 2019 to the year 2024. The chosen time frame aligned with the COVID19 pandemic era when online psychotherapy was frequently used in United States of America. Other than the time frame, the researcher considered studies with human subjects who were either counselees, counsellors, individuals who had experienced or were experiencing mental health challenges, adult participants, and young participants including children. The chosen studies were those that had used online psychotherapy as an intervention or used both in-person counselling and online psychotherapy. Outcomes of the studies were also considered during the selection. The researcher considered studies with outcomes that were either categorized in the form of experiences or effects.
2. Search
The search process was guided by English language use in the articles and confined to search terms that included online psychotherapy mental health outcomes, telepsychiatry effectiveness, internet-based interventions for mental health, and advantages and disadvantages of online counselling. When the search phrase online psychotherapy and mental health outcomes was searched, 3500 materials were found from the Saint Leo University library. When the search term was paraphrased to focus on peer-reviewed articles between the year 2019 to the year 2024, the search yielded 89 articles. When the terms virtual counseling or virtual psychotherapy were used, the search yielded 389 materials from Saint University Library, 28 materials from PubMed, 6 materials from PsycINFO, and 89 materials from Google Scholar. When the search term was paraphrased to include peer-reviewed articles published between the year 2019 to the year 2024, only 12 articles were found in the University Library, 34 articles were found in Google Scholar, 3 articles were retrieved from PubMed, and 2 articles were found in PsycINFO.
The search term telepsychiatry effectiveness yielded 600 articles from the Saint Leo University Library and 891 articles from Google Scholar, PubMed, and PsycINFO. This particular search also yielded a total of 69 books from all these libraries. When the search was narrowed to peer-reviewed articles from the year 2019 to the year 2024 a total of 19 articles were retrieved from these libraries. The search term internet-based interventions for mental health yielded a total of 96 materials from Saint Leo University, 697 materials from Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and PubMed. When the search was narrowed by paraphrasing the term to include peer-reviewed articles published in the 2019 to the year 2024, a total 27 peer-reviewed articles were found from these libraries. When search term advantages and disadvantages of online counseling was used, a total of 123 articles were retrieved from Saint Leo University Library, 368 articles were found in Google Scholar, PsycINFO, and PubMed. When search was narrowed to peer-reviewed articles published in the year 2019 to the year 2024, a total of 29 articles were retrieved from these libraries. The narrowed search based on peer-reviewed articles published between the year 2019 to the year 2024 yielded a total of 134 articles for all the search terms used. When measurements, outcomes, subjects, variables, and quality were considered, the researcher was only left with 15 peer-reviewed articles that have been further analyzed in the attached box score.
3. Conclusion
This methodology utilized a narrative review with a systematic search strategy. The study did not rely on any measurement tools or devices to obtain the information for this research. English language use was a considered a key guideline in the selection criteria. Peer-reviewed articles published in English between the year 2019 to the year 2024 were considered for the review. Subjects, variables, outcomes, and quality were considered in choosing the 15 peer-reviewed articles.
Review of Literature
This section of the paper performs a review of the selected studies in accordance with the study questions. The section has been broken into the below segments which directly conform with the research questions. The review was narrowed down to a total of 15-peer reviewed articles that met the selection and evaluation criteria.
Online Therapy
Numerous studies have looked at the subject of online therapy. However, only those studies that have compared online therapy to in-person counseling were considered for this study. The studies considered in this research were those that could give the researcher information in doing this comparison as well as answering other research questions. Online therapy was mentioned by Greenwood et al. (2022) who in their study compared telehealth versus face-to-face psychotherapy. Despite the fact that telehealth covers a wide range of health services that can be offered through the internet, Greenwood et al. (2022) not only mentioned psychotherapy as one of the telehealth services, but also focused their study on the comparison of psychotherapy versus face-to-face counseling. The article was therefore found to be relevant and applicable to the study. Greenwood conveys online psychotherapy as a new area that can help patients seek mental health services. The researchers also attributed the increased use of this method of psychotherapy to the COVID19 pandemic which made it difficult for both patients and healthcare providers to interact face-to-face. Online therapy was also mentioned by Khan et al. (2021) in their study that looked at the experiences of the counselors in online psychotherapy. The study highlighted a number of factors that that affect counselors’ experience. Some of the factors are therapeutic alliance, convenience, online counseling skills, ethical and legal concerns, reaching out to diverse client base, client suitability for online psychotherapy, professional and personal goals, and client satisfaction.
Whereas Khan et al. (2021) mentioned psychotherapy by focusing on counselor experiences when providing this type of psychotherapy, Zeren et al. (2022) mentioned online psychotherapy but focused on client experiences of online counselling. Zeren et al. (2022) took cognizance of the fact that there are few studies that have investigated the experiences of the clients in this type of counseling. Their study focused on two key themes which were associated with client experiences. The themes were therapeutic alliance and patient experiences. Flexibility of online counseling, limitations of online counseling, and improvement in the symptoms were associated with patient satisfaction. On the other hand, therapeutic alliance was associated with themes such as the bond between the counselor and the client, tasks, and goals. Zeren et al. (2022) relied on semi-structured interviews to extract information from 6 client-participants. Online therapy was also mentioned by Westerhof et al. (2019) who in their study looked at how online therapy could be used to overcome depressive symptoms when it was led by the counselor versus when it was supported by the peers. The results of the study established that counselor-led online psychotherapy was more effective than peer supported counseling in terms of reducing depressive symptoms.
Effectiveness of Online Therapy versus In-person counseling
Studies on online psychotherapy established that it was effective in helping patients overcome depressive symptoms. For instance, Ierardi et al. (2022) established that online psychotherapy was effective in helping patients reduce distresses such as anxiety, depression, and obsessive and compulsive disorders. The study took a comparative approach and showed that there were some differences in when online psychotherapy was compared to in-person counseling in terms of effectiveness. Whereas online psychotherapy showed effectiveness in managing psychological distresses in some subscales, in-person counselling was effective in managing psychological distresses in all the subscales that were considered for the study. Sander et al. (2021) conducted a study that looked into the effectiveness of online psychotherapy. The study established that online psychotherapy was effective in helping patients overcome mental health disorders. However, the method could not be adapted to special needs patients with severe mental illnesses.
Accessibility and Reach in Online Therapy versus In-person Counseling. Convenience is a key factor when it comes to the use of online psychotherapy in the treatment of online psychological disorders. Renn et al. (2019) in their study that investigated the factors associated with client preferences for digital psychotherapy in the treatment of depression and anxiety found out that privacy, time commitment, location of services, and stigma were among the factors that made patients to prefer online psychotherapy to in-person counseling. In terms of location, accessibility was considered a key factor in determining the use of online psychotherapy. The study which also looked at how rural dwellers in America could benefit from online psychotherapy found out that individuals in the rural areas with interconnection could benefit from this model of psychological care due to accessibility. Ncheka et al. (2024) in their study that looked at the implementation of cognitive-based psychotherapy in low mood showed that internet-based psychotherapy was recommended for students from low-incoming settings due to convenience and affordability. The study which relied on student population also revealed that students or young people who were technologically savvy preferred online psychotherapy to in-person counseling. Accessibility in terms of demographics was also confirmed in the studies conducted by Ierardi et al. (2022) who showed that young individuals were more likely to subscribe to the use of online psychotherapy in the treatment of depressive disorders as compared to older adults.
Therapeutic Alliance and User Experience in Online Psychotherapy versus In-person Counseling.
Therapeutic alliance and user experience is another area that should be considered when determining the use and effectiveness of online psychotherapy versus in-person counseling. Khan et al. (2021) in their study found that therapeutic alliance is a key factor in determining user experience in online psychotherapy. The closer relationship between a client and a counselor in-person counseling may make a patient prefer in-person counseling to online psychotherapy. Even though the study lauded online psychotherapy in helping clients deal with symptoms of psychological disorders, the study revealed that a strong therapeutic alliance or personal interaction between a counselor and a client was necessary in improving client experience. Therapeutic alliance and user experience was also mentioned by Zeren et al. (2022) in their study that investigated client’s experiences of online counseling. The study also considered patient satisfaction. The results of the study showed that tasks, bond, and goals were the themes associated with therapeutic alliance while improvement in symptoms and flexibility were associated with client satisfaction (Zeren et al., 2022). According to Zeren et al. (2022), clients who used online psychotherapy, reported positive experiences in relation to online counseling.
Key Findings
The review established that the experience of counselors was a key determinant in the success of online counseling. This was evident in the studies conducted by Khan et al. (2021). Their study also showed that therapeutic alliance and patient satisfaction were associated with a reduction in depressive symptoms, thus improving experiences of the users. Similar findings were found out by Zeren et al. (2022). The review also showed that even though online counseling was likely to be preferred with respect to convenience, cost effectiveness, and accessibility, in-person or face-to-face counseling was favored by majority of the subjects in the selected articles. The review explored the planning practices for public counseling therapists (Khan et al., 2021).
In terms of effectiveness, Ierardi et al. (2022) established that online psychotherapy was effective in helping patients reduce the effects of depressive symptoms such depression and anxiety. In its comparative approach, the study showed that in-person counseling had the ability to help clients overcome all the subscales of depressive disorders. Békés et al. (2021) in their study also highlighted that online psychotherapy was effective in helping patients deal with depressive symptoms, however, the effectiveness of this model decreased overtime due to lack of personal interaction between clients and counselors. Schuster et al. (2020) in their study that looked at the pros and cons of both online psychotherapy and blended models assert that blended models were more effective than internet-based psychotherapy. Renn et al. (2019) in their study showed that clients were more likely to use online psychotherapy for reasons such as accessibility, commitment to time, privacy, affordability, and location of services. The findings were supported by Ncheka et al. (2024) who showed that affordability and convenience were the key factors that made students from low-income settings use online psychotherapy. Both Ncheka et al. (2024) and Ierardi et al. (2022) mentioned the subject of demographics. The two studies revealed why young individuals were more likely to use online psychotherapy instead of in-person counseling. Unlike older adults, young individuals are technologically savvy and prefer to use online-psychotherapy due to cost considerations (Ierardi et al., 2022).
Limitations
The results of this review were limited to several conditions. Defining the boundaries of the present understanding of e-therapy's effect on mental health through recognition and acknowledgment of these limitations is critical to build a basis for a transparent interpretation of the findings and the further expansion and refinement of the research. The study was limited in scope and therefore could not be generalized to other settings. The fact that the study only focused on peer-reviewed articles published in the year 2019 to the year 2024 during the COVID-19 pandemic, remains a limiting factor that cannot be overlooked. The review was confined to the three research questions.
Conclusion
The current review had the key aim of answering the research question as to whether online or internet-based psychotherapy was more effective in handling mental health problems compared to in-person counseling. The reviewed materials showed that most of the subjects in the articles considered for review were likely to favor in-person counseling in terms of effectiveness. However, online counseling was favored for reasons such as convenience and affordability. The study had several limitations and therefore cannot not be generalized to all settings. One of the limitations was that the articles used in the review were published between year 2019 to the year 2024. The practical implications are that counseling experts should consider the conditions that may make a patient choose one counseling method in favor of the other. Areas for future research are provided by limitations. Future studies should focus on diverse articles from different library settings. Future studies should investigate issues such as security in online psychotherapy, and patient privacy protection. In as much as online psychotherapy comes with the benefits of convenience and cost savings, future studies should focus on ethical issues associated with online psychotherapy.
References
Békés, V., Aafjes-van Doorn, K., Luo, X., Prout, T. A., & Hoffman, L. (2021). Psychotherapists’ challenges with online therapy during COVID-19: Concerns about connectedness predict therapists’ negative view of online therapy and its perceived efficacy over time. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 705699. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.705699
Greenwood, H., Krzyzaniak, N., Peiris, R., Clark, J., Scott, A. M., Cardona, M., ... & Glasziou, P. (2022). Telehealth versus face-to-face psychotherapy for less common mental health conditions: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JMIR Mental Health, 9(3), e31780. DOI: 10.2196/31780
Ierardi, E., Bottini, M., & Riva Crugnola, C. (2022). Effectiveness of an online versus face-to- face psychodynamic counselling intervention for university students before and during the COVID-19 period. BMC psychology, 10(1), 1-10. Retrieved from https://bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40359-022-00742-7
Khan, S., Shapka, J. D., & Domene, J. F. (2021). Counsellors’ experiences of online therapy. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 50(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1885009
Last, B. S., Mirhashem, R., & Yang, Y. (2024). From plan to practice: A qualitative study of public mental health therapists’ session-planning practices. Psychological Services. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000840
Ncheka, J. M., Menon, J. A., E Bethan Davies, Paul, R., Mwaba, S. O. C., Mudenda, J., Wharrad, H., Tak, H., & Glazebrook, C. (2024). Implementing internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (moodgym) for African students with symptoms of low mood during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative feasibilty study. BMC Psychiatry, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05542-4
Posselt, J., Baumann, E., & Dierks, M.-L. (2024). A qualitative interview study of patients’ attitudes towards and intention to use digital interventions for depressive disorders on prescription. Frontiers in Digital Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1275569
professionals. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 272(1), 107–
Renn, B. N., Hoeft, T. J., Lee, H. S., Bauer, A. M., & Areán, P. A. (2019). Preference for in- person psychotherapy versus digital psychotherapy options for depression: survey of adults in the US. NPJ digital medicine, 2(1), 6. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0077-1
Sander, J., Bolinski, F., Diekmann, S., Gaebel, W., Günther, K., Hauth, I., Heinz, A., Kleiboer, A., Riper, H., Trost, N., Vlijter, O., Zielasek, J., & Gerlinger, G. (2021). Online therapy: an added value for inpatient routine care? Perspectives from mental health care
professionals. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 272(1), 107–
118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01251-1
Schuster, R., Topooco, N., Keller, A., Radvogin, E., & Laireiter, A. R. (2020). Advantages and disadvantages of online and blended therapy: Replication and extension of findings on psychotherapists' appraisals. Internet Interventions, 21, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2020.100326
Sockalingam, S., Leung, S. E., Ma, C., Hawa, R., Wnuk, S., Dash, S., Jackson, T., & Cassin, S.
E. (2022). The impact of telephone-based cognitive behavioral therapy on mental health distress and disordered eating among bariatric surgery patients during COVID-19: Preliminary results from a multisite randomized controlled trial. Obesity Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-05981-6
Tuna, B., & Avci, O. H. (2023). Qualitative analysis of university counselors’ online counseling experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04358-x
Westerhof, G. J., Lamers, S. M. A., Postel, M. G., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2019). Online Therapy for Depressive Symptoms: An Evaluation of Counselor-Led and Peer-Supported Life Review Therapy. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx140
Xie, M., Wang, C., Li, Z., Xu, W., Wang, Y., Wu, Y., & Hu, R. (2023). Effects of remote dignity therapy on mental health among patients with hematologic neoplasms and their significant others: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 104668–104668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104668
Zeren, G., Erus, S. M., Amanvermez, Y., Genç, A. B., & Baki, D. U. Y. (2022). Client’s Experiences of Online Counseling: Satisfaction and Therapeutic Alliance. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 51(1), 634-658. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.843542
