Response to Discussion 6 (1) CM

100-150 Words per discussion

Marquia Berry

I do agree with the approach that was presented by Seganti, that the consequences should be logical, related, reasonable, and respectful. Doing so, allows students to know what is acceptable and what will be tolerated while in the classroom. This will show the students what happens when rules are not followed. For me as the teacher, making sure that the consequences are followed by those steps, sets up boundaries along with a good rapport between myself and the students.

Seganti’s approach, if followed, will show the students who is in charge in the classroom. The one rule that stood out to me was the rule of not giving out warnings. Warnings are indeed a waste of time. I believe that warnings give the students the notion that the teacher is not going to follow through with a real punishment. Warnings only allow the unacceptable behavior to continue. Warnings can be looked as small talk; in other words warnings are not firm punishment. I believe that I will apply Seganti’s approach in my classroom because it is the most reasonable approach and seems to be straight to the point. I am very aware that all students are different and come from various upbringings, but I believe that each student should be held to the same standard across the board. There should never be a student who feels that they are being “picked on” or not being treated fairly. At the beginning of the semester, I plan to go over the rules and consequences with the class. I would also send an outline home with the students so that they can show their caregivers/parents what has been stated in class. I believe that doing this lets the parents/caregivers know what I will expect of the students. This leaves little room for why their son/daughter was punished a certain way. Students must learn discipline in the classroom that they will carry with them into college and on into the real world of the workforce, board meetings, dealing with colleagues, various social circles, etc. They cannot be allowed to be disruptive and behave poorly while in an educational environment. Our jobs as teachers, are to promote good behavior and provide an upstanding education to each and every student that we will come in contact with.

Laquanna Spriggs

Mr. Senganti's theory on writing rules is a good one that I think teachers should try implementing this action in the classroom.. I do not feel as though when students copy the rules that it will reinforce negative thoughts about writing. To me maybe it will improve their writing skills and help on other levels too. I agree with Senganti that if students write the rules  they will be more willingly to comply. This can curve the actions of misbehavior in your classroom. I like that Senganti holds students accountable for their actions and how writing reinforce what your expectations are in your classroom. I agree that students should write the rules and give a copy to be sign by their parents. This will let the parents and caregivers know your expectations of your classroom and misbehavior consequences. I believe that when student's write the rules it is helping them academically with writing assignments. Rules can be related and reasonable that's why I think its important for them to be written by the students. Students will be held accountable and to make sure that there is no misunderstanding of the rules.Senganti's approach may seem a little bit harsh but I feel as though its one of the ideas that can be put into place in your classroom. I think that once the student see that he or she must write all the time due to misbehavior will be helpful academically. It is my belief  Senganti's theory works better with high school students than with elementary students. 

Tracy Hilaire

I can say that I agree and disagree with some of Seganti's approach. I do agree with Seganti on, "Make it your first priority to teach all students to understand and comply with class rules of behavior. Then hold all students accountable for complying with those rules" (Charles, 2019, p.124). I think it essential for the teacher to take the first few weeks of school to address the behavior. I also believe that it is better to start the year tougher and gradually loosen up as the year goes on.  I think students need a firm foundation when it comes to discipline in the classroom. Some may disagree with Seganti, but I do not find all of his approaches extreme. I think his system will prevent lousy behavior because students know what is expected of them. 

I can say, I can't entirely agree with Seganti's "warning principle," which states, "Giving students warnings are self-defeating and it waste time. Students beyond first or second grade kn0ow when they are misbehaving, so there is no need to warm them about it or say what you are thinking of doing something about it. You can spend your day (week, month, career) giving warnings instead of teaching. If you don't want students to manipulate you, don't give warnings." (Charles, 2019, p125).  This is inaccurate because some students have a terrible day, and all it takes is one reminder for them to change their behavior around. Some students need a quick reminder, "Do I need to call mom or dad?" Most students fix themselves immediately after mentioning their parents coming to school. In conclusion, I can say I agree with many other of Pagenti's approaches, but the "Don't Give Warning" policy I absolutely disagree. Students need chances in the classroom, especially students who are on the special education spectrum. 

Moreover, I agree with a lot of Seganti's approaches to classroom management. I do think it is an old fashion approach, but I think it is beneficial for student learning. Too many teachers prefer to be the student's friend than the disciplinarian, Seganti's approach guarantees teacher discipline success.