IFSM 441 RESPONSE 2

Running Head: RESPONSES 1

RESPONSES 3

Original Post

The Agile Project Management (APM) framework and the PMBOK framework are approaches to project management. The APM framework focuses more on managing a project, while the PMBOK framework focuses more on project management tools and techniques (Bergmann & Karwowski, 2018). For example, a project characterized by ambiguous and changing user requirements, such as developing a new satellite-guided laser assault weapon system. This is an ideal candidate for the APM framework since it is ideally suited to handle the ambiguity and change involved in such a project. The reason for this is that the APM framework is more focused on the process of managing a project and, thus, is better able to adapt to changing requirements. On the other hand, the PMBOK framework is more suited for a project with well-defined requirements, such as constructing a new office building. This is because the PMBOK framework is more focused on project management tools and techniques and, thus, is better able to execute a project with well-defined requirements.

In general, I feel that the APM framework method is most suited for a project characterized by vague and changing customer needs, such as developing a new satellite-guided laser warfare weapon system (Binci et al., 2022). The APM framework is designed to deal with inherently uncertain projects that need to be able to adapt as new information arises. The PMBOK framework, on the other hand, is more suited to projects where the requirements are well understood and unlikely to change.

The APM framework starts with the idea of envisioning the project, and then theoretical work is done to generate ideas and possible solutions. The next phase is to explore these ideas in more detail and then to adapt the solution as new information arises. The project is then closed out once it is complete. This iterative, flexible approach is well-suited to projects where the requirements are unclear and likely to change (Moradi et al., 2019). The PMBOK framework, on the other hand, starts with the idea of defining the project scope. Next, work is done to create a project schedule and budget. The project is then executed, monitored, and closed out (Moradi et al., 2019). This more linear approach is better suited to projects where the requirements are well understood and unlikely to change.

References

Bergmann, T., & Karwowski, W. (2018). Agile Project Management and Project Success: A Literature Review.  Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing,  783, 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94709-9_39

Binci, D., Cerruti, C., Masili, G., & Paternoster, C. (2022). Ambidexterity and Agile project management: an empirical framework.  The TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/tqm-01-2022-0011

Moradi, S., Kähkönen, K., & Aaltonen, K. (2019). Comparison of research and industry views on project managers’ competencies.  International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,  ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-04-2019-0085

Discussion to respond to

Donell

Agile project management (APM), also known as iterative project management, focuses on delivering value often and releasing products incrementally over time by taking customer feedback into account at each integration .Recent developments in project management have led to the emergence of agile project management (APM). APM will replace traditional project management in the twenty-first century, according to some analysts. The agile project management methodology divides huge projects into smaller, more manageable tasks that are carried out and finished over the course of the project cycle in brief iterations, often lasting two weeks (Serrador & Pinto 2015) Teams that use the Agile methodology can adapt to shifting project needs, streamline the workflow, and ultimately finish their job more quickly. Teams in Agile can publish bits and pieces of their work, like deliverables, as they are finished. This makes it easier for teams to show that these deliverables or work segments bring value and that, if any adjustments are necessary, they can be made promptly or any flaws can be corrected (Moradi, Kähkönen, & Aaltonen, 2019). This is thought to help prevent significant project failures because it is done as part of continuous improvement and does so throughout the project lifecycle.

References

Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work?—A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International journal of project management, 33(5), 1040-1051.

Moradi, S., Kähkönen, K., & Aaltonen, K. (2019). Comparison of research and industry views on project managers' competencies.  International Journal of Managing Projects in Business,  ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmpb-04-2019-0085

Reply

· Unread post

View profile card for Sabrina Omar

 

Discussion 3 to respond to

Sabrina Omar

yesterday at 2:39 PM

Hi Busayo,

I enjoyed reading your discussion post. The Agile Project Management framework is an iterative and interconnected technique of efficient project management during the whole lifecycle of the project. “It successfully integrates the traditional aspects of project management with modern requirements within the scope of the project” (Kissflow, para.1, 2021). Rather than concentrating only on the progress of the final product within the given constraints, the APM framework concentrates on bringing both value and quality under the same conditions. APM frameworks offers several advantages to users in both effectiveness and efficiency. In traditional project management there’s several methods and integrating changes is hard (Kissflow 2021). Therefore, I agree with you that the APM framework process is most suited for a project categorized by uncertain and modifying user requirements. “The greatest benefit it offers to the agile project management is the quick ability to change the direction of the project in order to meet the changing demands of the project” (Kissflow, para.4, 2021). Also, the five stages of the APM framework openly correlate with the five phases of project management. As you’ve stated they are envision, speculate, explore, adapt, and close (Kissflow 2021).

Reference:

Kissflow. (2021). The 5 Phases of the APM Framework. Kissflow. Retrieved from  https://kissflow.com/project/agile/5-phases-of-the-apm-framework/

Discussion 3 to respond to Chynna

I agree with your standing on the APM method because of its greater flexibility, APM increases the likelihood that the project will be completed without significant changes or redos. More and more people are opting for the agile approach when it comes to managing projects. Sprint planning was designed for projects that need to change direction often and quickly. (Alexander & writer, 2017) Agile is a collaborative approach to project management that promotes quick responses to changing circumstances. Processes may be repeated; less risk is taken, feedback can be given in real-time, shorter turnaround time, and reduced complexity. Errors may be minimized by breaking down the job into smaller, more manageable pieces. There is a fundamental issue with the process, which is that it may lead to unachievable expectations since it needs to be properly understood. However, that body of information is the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) framework approach. Users of this framework have access to a more extensive framework for controlling scope and other parameters. Alternatively, the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) is the benchmark for project management procedures, vocabularies, best practices, and recommendations. 

Alexander, M., & writer, C. (2017, February 28). Scrum vs. Lean vs. kanban: Comparing Agile Project Management frameworks. CIO. Retrieved October 26, 2022, from  https://www.cio.com/article/234378/compari

Responses