write one formal analytical paragraph
Response Paragraph Grading Rubric – Word processed
(This rubric includes standard abbreviations: sents = sentences, awk=awkward)
Student’s Name: __________________ Instructor: _____________________
|
Criteria |
1 point earned |
2 points earned |
3 points earned |
4 points earned |
Total |
|
Topic Sentence |
Weak topic sent; sets up a summary rather than an argument; doesn’t reflect content of body paragraph |
Topic sent makes weak, problematic, or obvious claim; vaguely identifiable |
Buried topic sent; makes arguable claim; potential for an interesting paragraph; missing 1 minor element |
Provocative topic sent; clear argument; topic narrowed to one strategy. |
|
|
Development (support/detail sents) |
Fails to meet development requirement |
Only meets ½ of development requirement |
Meets ¾ of development requirement |
Thoroughly develops topic from several angles |
|
|
Quality of content |
Development unrelated to topic sent; sents may be choppy, lacking cohesion and unity; no logical progression identified in argument; no variety in sent structure; doesn’t refer to reading; no documentation (if required); misunderstanding of material |
A few sents may be unrelated to topic sent; some sents may be choppy; awk sents; weak logic in paragraph development; some variety in sent structure; refers very little to reading; doesn’t explain quotations; faulty quotations; inadequate documentation (if required) |
One or two sents may be only loosely tied to topic sent; some evidence of cohesion with use of transitions; sents in logical order; a variety of sent structure; refers to reading assignment; a few problems with quotes, explaining quotes, or documentation (if required) |
All sents directly relate to topic sent; fluent use of transitions and other strategies for coherence and unity; logical progression of argument; wide variety of sent structures; synthesizes reading assignment; correct documentation (if required) |
|
|
Mechanics |
More than 3 major grammar errors: fragments, run-ons, subj-verb agreement; weak vocabulary; multiple spelling and punctuation errors |
1-3 major grammatical errors: frags, run-ons, subj-verb agreement; weak vocabulary; several spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors |
Minor errors in grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation |
Nearly perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation; no major grammatical errors |
|
|
Concluding sentence |
None identified |
Weak closing to the paragraph’s argument |
Concluding sent summarizes paragraph’s argument |
Concluding sent draws a conclusion about what was argued in body paragraph |
|
|
Format: paper & works cited page |
Not formatted correctly |
One major formatting error, or two minor errors |
One minor formatting error |
Formatted correctly: TNR 12 font, double spaced, 1” margins |
|
A = 23-24 total points earned equivalents
B = 20-22
C = 18-19
D = 16-17
F = < 15