1500 word response paper
PHIL 201
Response Paper Grading Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
Points Earned |
||
|
|
Good/Excellent |
Fair/Competent |
Deficient |
|
|
Content – Development |
100 to 120 points · Major points are stated clearly and are well-supported. · Content is persuasive and comprehensive. · Content and purpose of the writing is clear. · Thesis has a strong claim. · The audience is clear and appropriate for the topic. · Supportive information (if required) is strong and addresses writing focus. |
60 to 99 points · Major points are addressed but clarity or support is limited. · Content is somewhat persuasive or comprehensive. · Content is inconsistent (lack of clear purpose and/or clarity). · Thesis could be stronger. · Supportive information (if required) needs strengthening or does not address writing concepts. |
0 to 59 points · Major points are unclear and/or insufficiently supported. · Content is missing essentials. · Content has unsatisfactory purpose, focus, and clarity. · Supportive information (if required) is missing. |
|
|
Content – Organization and Structure |
30 to 40 points · Writing is well-structured, clear, and easy to follow. · Introduction compellingly forecasts the topic and thesis. · Each paragraph is unified and has a clear central idea. · Transitional wording is present throughout the writing. · Conclusion is a logical end to the writing. |
15 to 29 points · Adequately organized with some areas difficult to follow. · Introduction needs to provide a stronger gateway into the writing. · Some paragraphs lack unity. · Better transitions are needed to provide fluency of ideas. · Conclusion is trite or barely serves its purpose. |
0 to 14 points · Organization and structure detract from the writer’s message. · Introduction and/or conclusion is incomplete or missing. · Paragraphs are not unified (more than one topic/missing or inadequate controlling and concluding sentences). · Transitions are missing. · Conclusion, if present, fails to serve its purpose. |
|
|
Form – Grammar and Diction |
15 to 20 points · The writing reflects grammatical, punctuation, and spelling standards. · Language is accurate, appropriate, and effective. · Writing’s tone is appropriate and highly effective. |
8 to 14 points · The writing contains some grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors. · Language is unclear, awkward or inappropriate in parts. · The writing’s tone is generally appropriate and moderately effective. |
0 to 7 points · The writing contains many grammatical, punctuation and/or spelling errors. · Language use is largely inaccurate or inappropriate. · The writing’s tone is ineffective and/or inappropriate. |
|
|
Form – Format |
15 to 20 points · Writing correctly follows formatting guidelines. · Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are used correctly and appropriately. · Paper is at least 1,500 words. |
8 to 14 points · Writing follows most formatting guidelines, but some flaws are detected. · Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations are incorrectly formatted or used. · Paper is less than 1,500 words. |
0 to 7 points · Writing lacks many elements of correct formatting. · Parenthetical and bibliographical source citations and/or references are not provided. · Paper is far less than 1,500 words. |
|
|
Total |
/200 |
|||
|
Instructor’s Comments: |
Page 2 of 2