Response 3
itsmechintu
Response3Rubric.htmRubric Detail
A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: BIA Scenario Response Rubric
Description: BIA scenario responses are graded using the following rubrics.
| Successful | Adequate | Developing | Need Improvement | Unsuccessful | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topic Development: Solution-based critical thinking | Points: 1 (50.00%) Thoroughly demonstrated critical thinking on the focus elements - the identified business operation, process, or function, its inputs and outputs, and the proposed alternative solution if the function were inoperable; substantial connections to the course by using the required textbook and academic and/or industry references. Feedback: | Points: 0.75 (37.50%) Somewhat demonstrated critical thinking on the focus elements - the identified business operation, process, or function, its inputs and outputs, and the proposed alternative solution if the function were inoperable; moderate connections to the course by using the required textbook and/or industry references. Ideas need more development. Feedback: | Points: 0.5 (25.00%) Limited demonstration of critical thinking on the focus elements - the identified business operation, process, or function, its inputs and outputs, and the proposed alternative solution if the function were inoperable; limited connection to the course made by using the required textbook and academic/industry references Ideas need significantly more development. Feedback: | Points: 0.25 (12.50%) Little to no attempt to demonstrate critical thinking on the focus elements - the identified business operation, process, or function, its inputs and outputs, and the proposed alternative solution if the function was inoperable; little to no effort to make a connection to the course by using the required textbook and academic and/or industry references. Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) No demonstration of critical thinking on the focus elements; no connection to the course and did not incorporate the required textbook and academic and/or industry sources OR confusing and/or off-topic. Feedback: |
| Writing Mechanics | Points: 0.5 (25.00%) Strictly adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. Zero to two errors noted. Appropriately cited reference materials; authors last name, initials, publication year, source title, publication name, issue, volume, and weblink. Reference listed in alphabetical. In-text citations include the authors last name, publication year, and page number if using a direct language from the source. 1 - 2 APA style or usage errors. Feedback: | Points: 0.375 (18.75%) Excellently adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. Three to six errors noted. Attempted in-text citations and reference list but 3 - 4 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 1 - 2 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference. Feedback: | Points: 0.25 (12.50%) Satisfactorily adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. Some contractions or jargon used. Seven to 10 errors noted. Attempted in-text citations and reference list but 5 - 6 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 3 – 4 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference. Feedback: | Points: 0.125 (6.25%) Minimally adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. Contractions or jargon used. More than 10 errors found OR somewhat incomprehensible. Attempted in-text citations and reference list but 7 - 8 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 5 - 6 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference. Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) Does not adhere to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. An overwhelming number of contractions or jargon used OR incomprehensible OR was not an academic submission as the number of errors was too plentiful. No APA style attempted OR more than 9 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate more than 7 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference. Feedback: |
| Attention to Instructions | Points: 0.5 (25.00%) Scenario response contained all 5 major assignment requirements: 1) At least 300 words, 2) At least two scholarly references no older than 2005, 3) APA format with reference list and in-text citations, 4) Does not contain informal greetings such as “Hi Class,” or closing statements such as “Thank you all,” and 5) written in a clear and concise manner. Feedback: | Points: 0.375 (18.75%) Scenario response omitted one major assignment requirements. Feedback: | Points: 0.25 (12.50%) Scenario response omitted two major assignment requirements. Feedback: | Points: 0.125 (6.25%) Scenario response omitted three major assignment requirements. Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) Scenario response omitted more than four major assignment requirements. Feedback: |
| Unacceptable | Points: 0 (0.00%) Plagiarized: There is a zero-tolerance policy for academic dishonesty and plagiarism. Per the course syllabus, any student who engages in academic dishonesty and plagiarism will receive a zero for all corresponding sections for the assignment. As an example, if you plagiarize Scenario Submission 1, you will receive a zero for both Scenario Submission 1 and Scenario Response 1 assignments. Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) Late: Per the course syllabus, no late assignments are accepted without prior approval. Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) Off-topic: Submission was completely off-topic. Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) Feedback: | Points: 0 (0.00%) Feedback: |
Topic Development: Solution-based critical thinking--
Levels of Achievement: Successful 1 (50.00%) points Thoroughly demonstrated critical thinking on the focus elements - the identified business operation, process, or function, its inputs and outputs, and the proposed alternative solution if the function were inoperable; substantial connections to the course by using the required textbook and academic and/or industry references. Adequate 0.75 (37.50%) points Somewhat demonstrated critical thinking on the focus elements - the identified business operation, process, or function, its inputs and outputs, and the proposed alternative solution if the function were inoperable; moderate connections to the course by using the required textbook and/or industry references. Ideas need more development. Developing 0.5 (25.00%) points Limited demonstration of critical thinking on the focus elements - the identified business operation, process, or function, its inputs and outputs, and the proposed alternative solution if the function were inoperable; limited connection to the course made by using the required textbook and academic/industry references Ideas need significantly more development. Need Improvement 0.25 (12.50%) points Little to no attempt to demonstrate critical thinking on the focus elements - the identified business operation, process, or function, its inputs and outputs, and the proposed alternative solution if the function was inoperable; little to no effort to make a connection to the course by using the required textbook and academic and/or industry references. Unsuccessful 0 (0.00%) points No demonstration of critical thinking on the focus elements; no connection to the course and did not incorporate the required textbook and academic and/or industry sources OR confusing and/or off-topic. Feedback:Writing Mechanics--
Levels of Achievement: Successful 0.5 (25.00%) points Strictly adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. Zero to two errors noted. Appropriately cited reference materials; authors last name, initials, publication year, source title, publication name, issue, volume, and weblink. Reference listed in alphabetical. In-text citations include the authors last name, publication year, and page number if using a direct language from the source. 1 - 2 APA style or usage errors. Adequate 0.375 (18.75%) points Excellently adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. No contractions or jargon used. Three to six errors noted. Attempted in-text citations and reference list but 3 - 4 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 1 - 2 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference. Developing 0.25 (12.50%) points Satisfactorily adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. Some contractions or jargon used. Seven to 10 errors noted. Attempted in-text citations and reference list but 5 - 6 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 3 – 4 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference. Need Improvement 0.125 (6.25%) points Minimally adhered to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. Contractions or jargon used. More than 10 errors found OR somewhat incomprehensible. Attempted in-text citations and reference list but 7 - 8 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate 5 - 6 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference. Unsuccessful 0 (0.00%) points Does not adhere to the standard usage rules of written mechanics and used paragraphs and full sentences rather than bullet points. Written mechanics include but are not limited to, capitalization, punctuation, run-on sentences, missing or extra words, stylistic, spelling, and grammatical errors. An overwhelming number of contractions or jargon used OR incomprehensible OR was not an academic submission as the number of errors was too plentiful. No APA style attempted OR more than 9 APA style errors existed OR failed to use APA citations when appropriate more than 7 times throughout; meaning the ideas expressed were not the student’s original thoughts, but information used from an uncited reference. Feedback:Attention to Instructions--
Levels of Achievement: Successful 0.5 (25.00%) points Scenario response contained all 5 major assignment requirements: 1) At least 300 words, 2) At least two scholarly references no older than 2005, 3) APA format with reference list and in-text citations, 4) Does not contain informal greetings such as “Hi Class,” or closing statements such as “Thank you all,” and 5) written in a clear and concise manner. Adequate 0.375 (18.75%) points Scenario response omitted one major assignment requirements. Developing 0.25 (12.50%) points Scenario response omitted two major assignment requirements. Need Improvement 0.125 (6.25%) points Scenario response omitted three major assignment requirements. Unsuccessful 0 (0.00%) points Scenario response omitted more than four major assignment requirements. Feedback:Unacceptable--
Levels of Achievement: Successful 0 (0.00%) points Plagiarized: There is a zero-tolerance policy for academic dishonesty and plagiarism. Per the course syllabus, any student who engages in academic dishonesty and plagiarism will receive a zero for all corresponding sections for the assignment. As an example, if you plagiarize Scenario Submission 1, you will receive a zero for both Scenario Submission 1 and Scenario Response 1 assignments. Adequate 0 (0.00%) points Late: Per the course syllabus, no late assignments are accepted without prior approval. Developing 0 (0.00%) points Off-topic: Submission was completely off-topic. Need Improvement 0 (0.00%) points Unsuccessful 0 (0.00%) points Feedback:Name:BIA Scenario Response Rubric
Description:BIA scenario responses are graded using the following rubrics.
