7 discussion responses on other people's post
RE: Week 2
Before the end of last week I decided to watch the film Sleep Dealer and did the readings after. After
watching the I found myself analyzing how the film was related to debt because while watching this
relation wasn't obvious to me. I did remember seeing the scene where Luz receives the call informing her
about her students loans. The man was informing her that if she didn't call them back they would sell all
her stuff after that his attitude of seriousness changes to tell her to have a good day as if it would be an
easy task after what he told her. I continue to see examples of how student debt can weight someone's
entire life to the point that they seem forced to actions that go against their wishes. I say this because Luz
was pushed to establish a relationship with Memo in order to get paid for her memories of him, something
that she would have thought twice if she wasn't in urgent need for the money. Another example is Elena
Martinez the USC student who did all the schoolwork and chores of her roommate to get paid and survive
her loans. I found this story to be surprising because of how she was taken advantage of by someone she
shared a living space with because of their different economic backgrounds. In a way I don't agree with
Elena's actions but I for sure I don't know how I would react if I was in her shoes and was desperate for
money. Something I clearly didn't catch while watching the film is that the end was an example of debt
abolishment until I read in in Curtis Marez's article. Did anyone else have this issue of making a
connection with debt abolishment when just watching?
RE: Week 3
I usually try to do the readings before listening to the lecture but this time I did the opposite. When
listening to the lecture, the themes were in a way new to me because I didn't know what the readings were
about. I figured they would be something related to student debt but it was something completely
different. It wasn't the first time I heard about the way Native Americans were treated during colonization.
It is thought by many that they owe a debt to the colonizers for saving them and educating them in their
manner when in reality the colonizers owe Native Americans more than anything. They were stripped
from their land and resources and treated like salvages when in truth they were not dangerous nor
bothering anyone until the colonizers decided to take charge of their territory.
I also found it very interesting to learn more about how African Americans were made to feel after they
were declared free from being slaves. If I am being completely honest I hadn't considered how they were
made to feel as if they were in debt with those who made them their slaves. I did think it must have been
really hard for them to cope with freedom since it was a very long time that they lived as slaves. All they
knew in that time was to follow orders and get their tasks done if they didn't want to be whipped and
beaten down. I was surprised to read that things as free men were even more complicated than when they
were slaves. What I mean by this is that the fact that they were made to work for a minimum pay to fulfill
the responsibilities they now had was ridiculous. Even as free men they were made to sign contracts that
would have them enslaved to terrible working conditions. There is no better word than "indebted
servitude" to explain what they went through after being declared free. I found it enraging when reading
that even they thought they were better off as slaves because they didn't have anything as free men and
weren't educated to be able to succeed and live better. To look back at these part of history only makes me
feel disappointed and mad about the cruelty that men are willing to force upon others.
RE: Week 4
I was impressed as well as devastated by the injustices underdeveloped countries have to endure day a
day because of the loans their country took. I've never been to Jamaica but I was given an insight of the
real situation the country is in with the documentary Life and Debt. I truly believe that the documentary
did a great job at drawing me in with their methods, by this I mean that while watching I became more
and more intrigued on what the consequences were from taking loans from the World Bank. The fact that
they showed both the reality of the situation as well as the side that tourists see when visiting was
important to my experience. It made me feel bad about not being informed on what was happening in
Jamaica which is also what is happening in other underdeveloped countries. The scene that was the most
impactful for me was the one where the farmers are telling what competition did to the sell of their
produce, as well as the scene where we are shown all the milk that goes to waste because it can't be sold. I
became even more intrigued when I read Hennessey's chapter especially when she stated that "the Bank
and IMF are 'colonial institutions' in that hundreds of millions of people whose lives are affected by their
decisions have no voice or effective representation in their policies" (Hennessey 43). It is completely
enraging to know that almost all the time those who are affected have no say on what it is that caused
them distress and how to stop it from going on. In my opinion the World Bank's only interest was to make
more and more money with the policies they created rather than help those in need which is completely
saddening.
RE: Week 7
One theme that I noticed while watching the film, 99 Homes, that was talked about in this class was that
banks and these other “big players” in the market are more important than people who take out the loans
from them and because of this debt collection between the two is completely different. Whereas regular
people are being evicted from their long owned homes from unpaid payments from a month or so ago,
while big banks and others are getting millions of dollars of pay-outs when they fall behind or unable to
pay for payments. As we can see in the end of the film where Nash is being arrested from bringing forged
documents to a court case for a property on behalf of Rick Carver, so while Dennis Nash is in the back of
the police cruiser Rick Carver is standing alongside some of his colleagues and lighting up a cigar. We
can only assume that Carver walked free and Nash was the scapegoat and was fully arrested for the crime
while the house he tried to save from being evicted were in the end still repossessed and his heroic efforts
were for naught.
There was one scene that had me in tears due to the realisticness of the situation. This scene being when a
very elderly man was having his house repossessed and when they were asking if he had anyone he could
stay with for the time being and he answered that he did not have anyone, not even a neighbor that could
help; reality struck me. My grandparents have a similar situation where they took a second mortgage out
on their home (my childhood home), so seeing this made me think about how ruthless it is when things hit
the fan and you’re unable to pay for debts due to whatever reason and you’re left homeless and alone like
how most likely this elderly man was left.
RE: Week 8
With the risks of unwieldy debt that comes with taking part in loans, many lenders desire to have a
vulnerable population of people to take on loans to gain profit. By doing so, many people have lived
under the "radical risk" of living where many have lived an uncertain financial life. McClanahan states
that many borrowers have suffered high rates of closure. The US housing market also turned the practice
of purchasing homes, like assets, and turned them into "financial commodities." There is an exchange that
occurs between paying back and payback that is unstable. Social violence is involved when there is an
agreement that is not reached when there is an undesirable agreement. Through debt securitization, there
have been more lending practices available for housing, from 5% to 30%. The lending practices were
made with rewarded risks after the 1933 Glass Steagall Act was repealed.
RE: Week 9
This week readings had me feeling out of words since I began to feel hopeless and feeling angry about the
way debt and the system have and continue to fail us. I was surprised to be completely emerged and
interested in the reading "Strike Debt..." because I wasn't prepared for all the information I would gain
from reading the manual. One of the first things I read in the preface was the following statement, "the
system of mafia capitalism has made it difficult, if not impossible, for us to meet our basic needs, whether
we have debt or not, whether we pay it back or not" (ii). I believe this is when I first felt that hunger to
hear more about what the manual had to offer. I found the name that was given to the system to be
perfectly suiting because no matter what we do the system continues to trick us and drown us in economic
problems because we don't have the means to even survive and pay for basic needs. I also found it really
interesting when I read the following statement, "those who struggle to stay afloat or who have fallen into
default are told that they are failures, inadequate and abject, and so they do not speak out" (2). I strongly
believe that many have been made feel this way because of the stigma that debt carries within. It is very
rare when a person will get into detail of what they had to borrow to pay for their education, for a better
living situation, or for things that they wanted to have. It is disturbing to think that to be able to correct
credit mistakes you will have to persist and continue to call and email those who made the mistake just to
be heard, when it shouldn't have to be that way. I believe that if someone points a mistake on their credit it
should take only a one time request to get it fixed not a bunch of requests for a long period of time. I was
a bit confused by the following quote, "the older the debt, the less worthwhile it is to pay it back" (9), the
reason being that I thought that the longer you waited to pay for your debt the more interests you would
be accumulating to the point that you will have to go to bankruptcy so I am not sure how this can apply to
someone that decides not to pay for an old debt. I totally agree when it is said that we are in debt because
we are not paid enough, this is a enormous problem because our living costs continue to rise and we are
supposed to cover them with a pay that it is not merely enough or fair to the work we may do. I am sure
there is so much more I can touch on what the manual covered but these are some of the things I found
key and interested in. I can in total honesty say that the information this manual contains is really valuable
and worth the read.