NI Assgmt

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Develop a 5- to 6-slide PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following: ·   Explain the concept of a knowledge worker. ·   Define and explain nursing informatics and highlight the role of a nurse leader as a knowledge worker.

32 (32%) - 35 (35%)

The presentation clearly and accurately explains the concept of a knowledge worker.  The presentation clearly and accurately defines and explains nursing informatics with a detailed explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.  Includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed sources and 2 or more course resources.

28 (28%) - 31 (31%)

The presentation explains the concept of a knowledge worker.  The presentation defines and explains nursing informatics with an explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.  Includes: 2 peer-reviewed sources and 2 course resources.

25 (25%) - 27 (27%)

The presentation inaccurately or vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker.  The presentation inaccurately or vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate or vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker.  Includes: 1 peer-reviewed sources and 1 course resources.

0 (0%) - 24 (24%)

The presentation inaccurately and vaguely explains the concept of a knowledge worker or is missing.  The presentation inaccurately and vaguely defines and explains nursing informatics with an inaccurate and vague explanation of the role of the nurse leader as a knowledge worker or is missing.  Includes: 1 or fewer resources.

·   Develop a simple infographic to help explain these concepts.

14 (14%) - 15 (15%)

The presentation provides an accurate and detailed infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.

12 (12%) - 13 (13%)

The presentation provides an infographic that helps explain the concepts related to the presentation.

11 (11%) - 11 (11%)

The presentation provides an infographic related to the concepts of the presentation that is inaccurate or vague.

0 (0%) - 10 (10%)

The infographic provided in the presentation related to the concepts of the presentation is inaccurate and vague, or is missing.

·   Present the hypothetical scenario you originally shared in the Discussion Forum. Include your examination of the data you could use, how the data might be accessed/collected, and what knowledge might be derived from the data. Be sure to incorporate feedback received from your colleagues' replies.

32 (32%) - 35 (35%)

The presentation clearly and thoroughly includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including a detailed and accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.

28 (28%) - 31 (31%)

The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an accurate examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data.

25 (25%) - 27 (27%)

The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague or inaccurate.

0 (0%) - 24 (24%)

The presentation includes the hypothetical scenario originally shared in the Discussion Forum, including an examination of the data used, how the data might be accessed/collected, and the knowledge that could be derived from the data that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:  Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:  Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) - 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) - 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) - 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) - 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100