Management and prevention of Sepsis during hospitalization proposal

Running head: RESEARCH STUDY CRITIQUE 1

RESEARCH STUDY CRITIQUE 6

Research Study Critique

Isel de la Torre

Ana G. Mendez

Research Study Critique

Title

The Use of Patient Monitoring Systems to Improve Sepsis Recognition and Outcomes: A Systematic Review provides the precise description on what occurs in the journal. It gives a general overview in an accurate way that is easy to interpret. The practice is focused on the reflection of the appropriate ideals that are supposed to be observed and reflected upon in a way that is productive and reflective in the issues that take place.

Abstract

Reading through the presented article one is able to understand what is being presented on the general paper. The application of the patient monitoring systems is perfectly elucidated. Reading through it enables one to reflect on what is being discussed in the article.

Introduction

Reading the introduction enables the reader to understand the purpose. The purpose of the article is perfectly explained on the use of the patient monitoring systems that are applied in the basic improvement of the sepsis recognition. This is perfectly applied in a way that is reflective on the basic concepts that needs to be applied when explaining the events within the article.

Statement of the problem

Reading through the article one can clearly reflect on how the statement of the problem is clearly explained which entails the use of the patient monitoring system. This is a basic practice that is focused on reflecting on basic ideals that are relevant to focus on and practice in a way that is reflective on the general purpose of the article.

Purpose of the study?

The purpose of the study is clearly reflected upon. The basic concepts are introduced and explained in a way that is easy to understand and focus upon (Bryan & Kendall, 2020). The process is focused on the reflection of basic ideals that are important. In this case, the authors ensure that the topics are clear to understand.

Research question(s)

The presentation of the research question is done in a clear way that is perfectly defined. The approach is easy to understand as key reflection are explained in a way that is essential and productive (Bryan & Kendall, 2020). The approach is perfect as it makes the purpose of the article clear.

Theoretical framework

The theoretical framework of the article is perfectly defined in a way that is elucidative of the basic concepts that are being introduced in most parts of the article (Bryan & Kendall, 2020). It has a framework that enables one to understand the key purpose of the article that is reflective and appropriate.

Literature review

A look at the literature review elaborates on the keen approach that was applied in the entire paper. It focuses on reflecting on the key ideals that are relevant to reflect upon. The basic concepts are clearly reflected on in a manner that is consistent (Bryan & Kendall, 2020). Key approaches applied involve using reliable resources focuses on the reflection of the basic concepts applied. The review is focused on explaining the necessary research approaches that reflect on key issues that is important to reflect upon.

Methods

The application of the research methods is clearly appropriate. It leads to the collection of reliable research that is important to focus on and reflect on it in a way that is essential. it involved the use of the correct samples that is important to reflect upon in a way that is reflective on key issues that are ideal to focus upon (Bryan & Kendall, 2020). The use of the correct data instrument is clearly essential and reflective of the data approach.

Analysis

The application analysis ensures that the perfect analytical approach is applied in a way that is reflective of the correct ideals that are in place. it was clearly consistent with the research questions that are in place (Bryan & Kendall, 2020). The figures and tables are reflective of the statistics that is reflective of the correct goals in place.

Results

The presentations of the results are applied in a way that is clear and essential. The results are presented in a way that explain the concepts in a way that is reflective of the goals that are were supposed to be addressed (Bryan & Kendall, 2020). The statistics are also presented in a way that is easy to understand as it reflects on the final outcomes that were expected about the entire research.

Discussion

The discussion ensures that all the results are explained in a way that is reflective of the final goals that are presented in a way that is clear and relevant to reflect upon (Bryan & Kendall, 2020). The article explains further on the relationships that exists on the theoretical framework, relate with the research questions together with the provision of the significant that it has to nursing.

Limitations

The other factor that is addressed in this case is the respective limitations and the basic implications that are focused upon explaining the necessary concepts that are supposed to be focused on when explaining the concepts that are being presented (Bryan & Kendall, 2020). The limitations give a precise direction to the research that is supposed to be observed.

Conclusion

The conclusion that is given in the article is clear and essential to reflect upon. The concepts are clearly explained in a way that is focused on the policy makers, the future research that is essential to reflect upon in a way that is essential and respective in a way that s essential and reflective.

Reference

Bryan M. G & Kendall K. H. (2020) The Use of Patient Monitoring Systems to Improve Sepsis Recognition and Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Journal of Patient Safety.