I need help in writing a QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH STUDIES REPORT
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH STUDIES REPORT
Overview
In this assignment, you will analyze a quantitative research study. To complete this analysis, you will use the Week 3 Template: Quantitative Research Study Report [DOC] document to respond to a series of prompts and questions aimed at four different parts of the research study:
· Introduction.
· Methodology.
· Results.
· Discussion/Conclusion.
This assignment will give you practice reading, comprehending, and analyzing a very sophisticated, peer-reviewed quantitative research article. This skill set will serve you well as you begin the process of acquiring, reading, and comprehending quantitative literature related to your intended proposed applied improvement project (AIP). Even if you do not have a clearly defined problem of practice, you probably have an idea of the general area in which your AIP will investigate. There is no time like the present to begin developing your annotated bibliography because you must become completely knowledgeable about the literature surrounding your topic in order to develop an empirically sound AIP. Your goal should be to achieve "theoretical saturation" with the literature in your field. This means that any new article you encounter reflects another article or idea with which you are already familiar, which will provide a solid basis for developing your project.
Instructions
The following research article provides an example of how quantitative research methods can be applied to understanding structural relationships between human capital investments and long-term organizational outcomes. Read the article carefully and review the Creswell and Creswell text, the Pyrczak and Oh text, and other course resources and materials as necessary:
· Kim, T. (2015). Impacts of learning interventions on organizational human capital and performance . Performance Improvement Quarterly, 27(4), 7–28.
Quantitative Research Studies Report Scoring Guide
Due Date: End of Unit 3 Percentage of Course Grade: 10%.
|
CRITERIA |
NON-PERFORMANCE |
BASIC |
PROFICIENT |
DISTINGUISHED |
|
Summarize the research-theory framework. 13% |
Does not summarize the research-theory framework. |
Partially summarizes the research-theory framework. |
Summarizes the research-theory framework. |
Summarizes the research-theory framework and analyzes how the study represents a quantitative design. |
|
Answer each of the questions and prompts in the template. 15% |
Does not answer each of the questions and prompts in the template. |
Answers each of the questions and prompts in the template, though some answers are partial, unclear, or incorrect. |
Answers each of the questions and prompts in the template. |
Answers each of the questions and prompts in the template, and supports answers with reference to the literature. |
|
Describe study methodology and study sample. 13% |
Does not describe study methodology and study sample. |
Describes study methodology and study sample, but lacks sufficient details and relevant information. |
Describes study methodology and study sample. |
Describes study methodology and study sample and analyzes validity as well as legal and ethical issues. |
|
Provide summary of results and findings. 13% |
Does not provide summary of results and findings. |
Provides summary of results and findings but summary lacks sufficient detail and relevant information. |
Provides summary of results and findings. |
Provides comprehensive summary of results and findings. |
|
Describe how the study findings fit into the systems literature. 13% |
Does not describe how the study findings fit into the systems literature. |
Describes how the study findings fit into the systems literature, but description lacks strong supporting evidence. |
Describes how the study findings fit into the systems literature. |
Describes how the study findings fit into the systems literature and analyzes the implications for research and practice. |
|
Apply research findings to practice. 13% |
Does not apply research findings to practice. |
Applies research findings to practice but the discussion lacks in depth and completeness; there may be a misalignment. |
Applies research findings to practice. |
Applies research findings to practice and fully discusses the weaknesses and suggestions for future improvement and further research. |
|
Communicate clearly, supporting a central idea in appropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. 10% |
Communication is unclear and does not support a central idea in appropriate format. Does not use correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. |
Communicates clearly, supporting a central idea. Format is inconsistent and contains substantial errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics. |
Communicates clearly, supporting a central idea in appropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. |
Communication is exemplary, using evidence to support a central idea in a consistently appropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics. |
|
Writing adheres to APA formatting rules and APA writing style. 10% |
Writing does not adhere to APA formatting and APA writing style. |
Writing reflects inconsistent use of APA formatting and APA writing style. |
Writing adheres to APA formatting rules and APA writing style. |
Writing is exemplary, exhibiting strict and nearly flawless adherence to APA formatting rules and APA writing style. |