Class 1 Week 6

profilesueme
ResearchProposal-DataAnalysisMethodologyGradingRubric.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Statistical Analysis

30 to >27.0 pts

Advanced

Selection of the statistical procedures is appropriate for the data and congruent with the research question and the type of data collected. A rationale for the statistical procedure is provided. The description of the statistical procedures is clear and detailed. The level of significance is included.

27 to >24.0 pts

Proficient

Selection of the statistical procedures is appropriate for the data and congruent with the research question and the type of data collected. A rationale for the statistical procedure is provided but not well explained. The description of the statistical procedures is unclear and does not provided enough detail. The level of significance is not included.

24 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Selection of the statistical procedures is in appropriate for the data and incongruent with the research question and the type of data collected. A rationale for the statistical procedure is not provided. The description of the statistical procedures is clear and detailed. The level of significance is not included.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Strengths and Weaknesses

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

The strengths and weaknesses of the study are well articulated. They are specific and detailed in both areas.

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

The strengths and weaknesses of the study are partially articulated. They lack specifics and detail in both areas

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The strengths and weaknesses of the study are poorly articulated. They are nonspecific and have few details in both areas.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Outcomes Suggestions for further research

10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

A reasoned and appropriate outcome is described based on totality of the research proposal. Suggestions for further research are appropriate and based on the information provided.

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

The outcome is described loosely based on totality of the research proposal. The suggestions for further research are brief and do not give enough detail.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The outcome is poorly described and is not based on totality of the research proposal. The suggestions for further research are not clear.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Sources 10 to >9.0 pts

Advanced

All sources (information and graphics) are scholarly, current, and appropriate to the topic

9 to >7.0 pts

Proficient

Some sources (information and graphics) are scholarly, current, and appropriate to the topic.

7 to >0.0 pts

Developing

Sources (information and graphics) are not scholarly, current, and accurate.

0 pts

Not Present

10 pts

Research Proposal: Data Analysis Methodology Grading Rubric | NURS500_B02_202220

Criteria Ratings Points

Professional Writing Factors (APA, Grammar, Spelling, Sentence Structure)

30 to >27.0 pts

Advanced

There are minimal or no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Sources are documented in current APA format. Information is very organized and has a logical flow. The page count requirement of 3-5 pages is met.

27 to >24.0 pts

Proficient

There are a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Some sources are documented in current APA format. There are less than scholarly references included.

24 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There are many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. The sources are not documented in current APA format and/or there are 1-4 scholarly references included.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Total Points: 100

Research Proposal: Data Analysis Methodology Grading Rubric | NURS500_B02_202220