New doc

Brain and Behavior. 2021;11:e02196.  |  1 of 10 https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2196

wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/brb3

Received: 15 November 2019  | Revised: 25 April 2021  | Accepted: 5 May 2021 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2196

O R I G I N A L R E S E A R C H

Eating disorders and sexuality: A quantitative study in a French medically assisted procreation course

Marie Audier- Bourgain1  | Thierry Baubet1 | Alexandra Pham- Scottez2 | Maurice Corcos3 | Isabelle Nicolas3

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC

1Department of Children and Adolescents, Psychopathology, Avicenna Hospital, General Psychiatry and Addictology Specialized, Bobigny, France 2Psychiatric Orientation And Reception Center, GHU Paris Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Paris Cedex 14, France 3Department of adolescent and young adult psychiatry, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris cedex 14, France

Correspondence Marie Audier- Bourgain, Departement of child and adolescent, psychopathology, general psychiatry and addictology, Bobigny, France. Email: [email protected]

Abstract Objective: Among medically assisted procreation (MAP) patients, the prevalence of eating disorders (ED), clinical or subclinical, current or past, is considerable. In addi- tion to metabolic repercussions, the literature suggests that these patients present with more sexual dysfunction, leading to anxiety. This quantitative research on a population of women consulting a MAP department for unexplained or ovulatory infertility proposed to study the sexuality of this popu- lation by comparing the sexuality of patients suffering from or having suffered from an ED to the sexuality of the non- ED group. Method: Patients (n = 61) filled out the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE- Q), the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women (BISF- W), the ED Whole Life Research Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS). Results: We found a prevalence of 54% of ED, current or past. Even though these patients reported the same prevalence of sexual intercourse, they had significantly more physical problems (e.g., anorgasmia, vaginismus, headache) affecting their sexu- ality (p = .01) than the non- ED group, after adjusting for depression. Approximately 10% of the study population reported no intravaginal intercourse during the last month. Discussion: This study provides evidence for the existence of more sexual dysfunc- tion in patients who have a fertility disorder and have ED or a history of ED. Future research should evaluate the results of psychological or sexological care that may be more suitable for the infertility of these patients.

K E Y W O R D S

eating disorder, infertility, medically assisted procreation, sexuality, women

2 of 10  |     AUDIER- BOURGAIN Et Al.

1   |   I N T R O D U C T I O N

1.1 | Epidemiological data

In France, the biomedical agency reported 142,708 uses of assisted reproduction in 2012 compared to 131,736 in 2009. The children, conceived after 23,887 medically assisted procreation (MAP) in 2012, represent 2.9% of all children born to the general population that year, or approximately one child out of 35. After a year of at- tempting to conceive without contraception, 18% to 24% of couples remain childless. After two years, 8% to 11% of couples are still wait- ing for a pregnancy (National French Institute of Health and Medical Research, INSERM, 2016). An ovulation disorder accounts for 32% of infertility cases among women (Thonneau et al., 1991). Clinical and para- clinical investigations will not determine the organic etiol- ogy of infertility in 8% to 30% of couples (Ray et al., 2012; Thonneau et al., 1991). Psychological causes can then be mentioned, and among them, eating disorders.

1.2 | Eating disorders and fertility

Eating disorders (ED) are biologically related to fertility. Leptin, a hormone produced by adipose tissue, plays a central role in repro- duction. Its concentration in plasma is directly correlated with the body mass index (BMI) and, more specifically, with the fat mass. A minimal concentration of leptin is necessary for ovulation. This is the biological factor most strongly correlated with amenorrhea in anorexic patients (Bruneau et al., 1999). Amenorrhea occurs after a 10% to 15% loss of ideal body weight (ESHRE Capri Workshop Group, 2006). Regular cycles, reflecting good hormonal function- ing, would require a BMI>19 kg ∕m2 but also the absence of weight control behaviors, such as severe dieting, vomiting, or the misuse of laxatives (Abraham, 1998). A study found a high prevalence of menstrual disorders in women with subclinical ED and normal BMI compared to a non- ED group, matched on BMI (Kreipe et al., 1989).

In the MAP pathways, the prevalence of patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) or bulimia nervosa (BN) is four to five times higher than in the general population (Abraham, 1998; ESHRE Capri Workshop Group, 2006)(Freizinger et al., 2010; Resch et al., 1999; Stewart et al., 1990). High scores are particularly found in patients with no organic cause of infertility, even in the absence of thinness (Bates et al., 1979)(Resch et al., 1999)(Lamas et al., 2006).

These disorders are often difficult to detect by MAP profession- als. In one study, 76.4% of participants with ED had not reported this antecedent to their MAP team (Freizinger et al., 2010). Furthermore, infertility treatment is expensive and psychologically laborious. In the ignorance of an ED’s presence, the proposed care might be insuf- ficient or even inappropriate. The psychological problem is not con- sidered, despite the repercussions that it may have during pregnancy and motherhood (Easter et al., 2015; Watson et al., 2013). Indeed, several publications have suggested negative consequences such as depression, attachment disorders, socialization disorders, and

conduct disorders in children of mothers affected by eating disor- ders (Bulik et al., 2005; Haycraft & Blissett, 2010; Lai & Tang, 2008; Leinonen et al., 2003; Zerwas et al., 2012).

1.3 | Eating disorders and sexuality

In addition to the hormonal impact on libido, many psychoanalytical works describe an avoidance of sexual intercourse, or anxiety about it, among patients with ED. On the other hand, most scientific ex- ploratory studies of ED sexuality present with several biases. First, a sampling bias due to a low number of participants. Second, the metabolic aspect, which must be reasonably considered as one of the causes of a decline in sexual interest, is not taken into account. Third, the evaluation tools available are often reductive and do not allow for the appreciation of all of the aspects involved in this vast question. Nevertheless, they reflect a questioning that has been pre- sent for many years.

A high relapse rate and a frequent transition from one type of ED to another suggest they all share a common psychopathology. The most obvious data in the scientific literature are mainly rela- tional difficulties, especially concerning their sexual aspects, with, as a minimum, greater dissatisfaction and anxiety in patients with ED compared to healthy subjects (Carter et al., 2007; Castellini et al., 2012; Gonidakis et al., 2015; Mazzei et al., 2011). Few char- acteristics specific to each subgroup of ED have emerged (Beerens et al., 2014; Pinheiro et al., 2010).

Many authors have highlighted the central role of body image perturbations in this process. Several authors have also questioned the limited research findings on this topic and have looked for vari- ables that may explain the relationship between ED and sexuality: associations between personality traits, a bad image of the body, and a history of sexual trauma (Wiederman, 1996), correlations between the severity of sexual dysfunction and the severity of body preoccu- pation in patients with ED (Castellini et al., 2012). Body image pre- occupations precede the ED (Rosen, 1996), and constitutes one of the most prevalent residual symptoms (Castellini et al., 2011; Löwe et al., 2001; Ricca et al., 2010; Rosen, 1996; Vall & Wade, 2016). Thus, the whole ED symptomatology is characterized by an extreme silhouette or weight concern, which impairs self- esteem and affects sex life.

1.4 | Objectives of our study

Correlations between sexual behavior and EDs, however modest, are present. We make the assumption that the association of rejec- tion of sexual activity with a hormonal disorder can therefore rea- sonably be raised as the cause of fertility disorders in many patients with EDs, consulting in MAP.

The main objective of this study was to compare the sexuality of women who have or have had an ED with those of women with no previous history of ED, in a MAP department.

     |  3 of 10AUDIER- BOURGAIN Et Al.

To explore this issue, we decided to conduct a quantitative study on the current population consulting the MAP for unexplained infer- tility and ovulation disorders at the Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, a French hospital.

2   |   M AT E R I A L S A N D M E T H O D S

2.1 | Study design and population

This prospective, single- center study was conducted in the medi- cal assisted procreation unit of the Mutualiste Montsouris Institute in Paris, France. The patients were recruited from September 2015 through July 2016. After receiving their consent, patients were in- cluded in the study if they were women aged from 18 to 42 years, spoke French, and had consulted the MAP for unexplained infertility, primary or secondary, or ovulatory infertility, central or peripheral, before pregnancy.

Women were excluded if they were pregnant or no longer fol- lowed in the MAP after completing the questionnaires.

2.2 | Intervention

After diagnosing an ovulation disorder or unexplained infertility, the MAP medical team informed the patients that they would be contacted shortly for a study. During the consultation, the patient's identifiers and contact information were collected by a member of the staff. The patients were subsequently contacted by the research team to explain the study objectives. If they agreed to participate, they were sent a questionnaire.

The questionnaire included the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE- Q), the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women (BISF- W), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS). These last three questionnaires have been validated in their French ver- sions (Baudelot- Berrogain et al., 2006; Schumm et al., 1985; Untas et al., 2009). An ED Whole Life Research Questionnaire was also sent, which is used in the epidemiologic research conducted by our research team (Godart et al., 2013).

Subsequently, it was sufficient for them to return it by means of the included prestamped envelope. If they had any questions, the patients could contact the team by mail.

2.3 | Outcomes

2.3.1 | Primary outcome

To screen the ED cohort, we used the Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE- Q) and the ED Whole life Research Questionnaire.

The EDE- Q is a 36- item measure of general ED symptoms and features during the last 28 days. It includes four subscales of Restraint, Eating Concern, Shape Concern, and Weight Concern, plus a global score. The EDE- Q has shown good psychometric prop- erties and the global score has been used as a measure of overall eating psychopathology (Ekeroth et al., 2013).

We used an optimal cut- off of 1.62 for a BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 (sensitivity and specificity of 0.86), a cut- off of 2.51 for a BMI be- tween 18.5 and 24.9 kg/m2 (sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.90), and one of 3.15 for a BMI under 25 kg/m2(sensitivity and spec- ificity of 0.89) (Rø et al., 2015).

The ED Whole Life Research Questionnaire was used to identify any history of AN, BN, or other specified eating or feeding disorders (OSFED).

To compare the sexuality of patients who have or have had an ED with those of patients with no previous history of ED by using the Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women (BISF- W).

The BISF- W (Taylor et al., 1994) is a 22- question (49- item), a multidimensional, self- reported instrument for qualitatively and quantitatively assessing female sexual function and satisfaction lev- els, through seven Dimension (D) scores (D1: Thoughts/Desire; D2: Arousal; D3: Frequency of Sexual Activity; D4: Receptivity/Initiation; D5: Pleasure/Orgasm; D6: Relationship Satisfaction; D7: Problems Affecting Sexual Function =bleeding, irritation, lack of lubrication, painful penetration, difficulty having an orgasm, vaginismus, urine leakage, headache, and vaginal infection). D1, D2, and D5 reflect Kaplan's three- phase model for sexual response (Hawton, 1980), considered to be a conceptual model for assessing female sexual dysfunction (Derogatis & Conklin- Powers, 1998). D2 combines sub- jective perceptions of sexual arousal with the sensation of sexual inhibition and anxiety. D3 rates the quality and frequency of sexual activity. D4 rates the individual propensities to transform sexual de- sire and fantasies into sexual behavior. D6 and D7 qualitatively rate the emotional context in the sexual relationship and several prob- lems that could affect sexual function.

2.3.2 | Secondary outcomes

Anxio- depressive disorders and marital satisfaction were adjustment variables to take into account - Anxio- depressive comorbidities were explored with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a frequently used self- rating scale developed to assess psychological distress in nonpsychiatric patients. It consists of two subscales, Anxiety and Depression (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983). A score of 11 or more on the HADS defines a depressive or anxious syndrome.

- Conjugal satisfaction, which allowed the best interpretation of the results of the BISF- W, was assessed by the KMMS. The KMMS is a 3- item self- reported instrument designed to measure marital quality (Nichols et al., 1983). Items are rated on a 7- point Likert scale, ranging from one (extremely dissatisfied) to seven

4 of 10  |     AUDIER- BOURGAIN Et Al.

(extremely satisfied). The total score ranges from 3 to 21, with high scores meaning better marital quality.

2.4 | Statistical analysis

The minimum number of subjects required in each group was 28 (alpha risk of 0.05, power of 90%, unilateral comparison of average BISF- W scores between the two groups, with the hypothesis of a normal distribution in each group, and a standard deviation of the differences in each pair of subjects equal to 5).

2.4.1 | Univariate analysis

Qualitative variables were compared using the Chi- square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Quantitative variables were com- pared using Student's t- test. A point graph and Pearson correlations were used to find the link between two quantitative variables.

2.4.2 | Multivariate analysis

A linear regression model was performed to identify variables that significantly influenced the primary outcome.

2.5 | Legal and ethical aspects

This study was approved by the Committee for the Protection of Persons (CPP) of Cochin (Ile de France III) on 22 September 2015. Each subject was informed of the objectives and the mode of con- ducting the research, as well as the nonbinding nature of their par- ticipation. An information sheet and a consent form for participation in biomedical research were provided to them prior to inclusion. If ED or depressive symptoms were detected, an adapted follow- up was proposed to the participants.

3   |   R E S U LT S

3.1 | Description of the population

All patients who agreed to participate in the study were included consecutively (Figure 1). Among the 61 patients who filled out the questionnaires, 44 were diagnosed with unexplained infertility (72.1%) and 17 had an ovulation disorder (9%). Most of them were of a high socioeconomic level, representing the general patients of the Mutualiste Montsouris Institute. The mean infertility duration was over three years (40 months, ± 18.7) for patients who had used contraceptives prior to deciding to have a child (n = 48, 78.7%). The mean BMI was 22.5 kg/m2 (± 4.3) (Table 1). Eight patients had a BMI less than 18.5 kg/m2 (13.1%). Six of these eight patients had a history of EDs. One of them had a current ED.

3.2 | Frequency of eating disorders and anxio- depressive syndrome

After EDE- Q and whole- life ED questionnaire analysis, four groups were constituted (Figure 2):

- ED group (n = 33, 54.1%): patients with a present or past clinical or subclinical ED.

- Current ED group (n = 13, 21.3%): patients with a current AN, BN, or other specified feeding or eating disorders (OSFED) diagnosis.

- History of a clinical ED group (n = 12, 19.7%): grouping patients with a diagnosis of AN, or BN in their entire lifetime.

Five patients (8.2%) had probably a depressive disorder and 13 (21.3%) had probably an anxiety disorder. In our study, past or cur- rent ED and depression were noted to be significantly correlated (p >.2).

F I G U R E 1  Flow Chart

100 patients contacted

90 questionnaires sent

61 questionnaires sent back

1 refusal 9 patients excluded:

- 1 did not speak French - 8 were pregnant or in

the post-partum state

5 refused to answer 24 remain unreachable

     |  5 of 10AUDIER- BOURGAIN Et Al.

3.3 | Sexuality of the global study population and comparison of sexual function in women with or without ED compared to the non- ED group

Some items are not taken into account in the BISF- W overall score(Table 2):

- Modifications of activity, interest, excitement, and sexual satisfaction.

- Homosexual desires and experiences.

In terms of activity, 30 patients (50.8%) reported having a mark- edly or slightly decreased sexual activity, 20 patients (32.7%) had

a loss of interest, 19 patients (31.1%) had a loss of excitement and 13 patients (21.3%) considered themselves sexually less satisfied. Eleven patients (18%) mentioned some homosexual desires, but only two patients (3.3%) reported some homosexual experiences. There were no significant differences in these variables between the ED and non- ED groups.

In all BISF- W categories, the current ED groups reported more problems related to sexuality than the non- ED group (mean =2.74 versus 4.40, p =.01). This significant difference was observed in both the previous ED group (mean =3.05 versus 4.10, p =.033) and the current ED group (mean =3.33 versus 4.51; p =.049).

The thought and desire scores were higher in the current ED group than in the non- ED group (mean =6.99 versus 4.96, p =.023). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the other categories. Depressed patients had a lower overall score than the other patients (mean =25.68 versus 36.44, p =.046) and reported more problems (mean =5.53 versus 3.41, p =.01). After ad- justing for depression, the results obtained for the ED group were still related to the BISF- W problem score. Sexuality for patients with or suffering from ED is therefore significantly more problematic. On the other hand, patients currently suffering from ED had more desire and sexual thoughts, without more sexual activity.

The frequency of intravaginal intercourse was calculated by data from the BISF- W (Table 3). Six patients (9.8%) reported no in- travaginal intercourse for one month. Of these six patients, three described an unchanged sexual activity, suggesting that the ab- sence of sexual intercourse was common for the couple. The other three (n = 3) strangely reported having no sexual partner, while they were part of a couple and consulting for MAP. Three (50%) of these six patients had or did have an ED. To make comparisons, we classified the frequency of intercourse into two classes: not pro- creative, less than or equal to one time per month (n = 10, 16.39%), and procreative, greater than or equal to two times per month (n = 51, 83.6%). After analysis, there was a trend in the patient group with a history of AN or BN with a low frequency of sex (40% versus 15.7%, p =.096). We did not find any link between the fre- quency of sex and depression.

T A B L E 1  Baseline characteristics

Total (n = 61) ED (n = 33) Non- ED group (n = 28)

Cohabitation length – years (± SD; min – max values) 8.5 (± 3.3; 2 – 20)

8.1 (± 3.2; 2 – 16)

9.0 (± 3.3; 5 – 20)

Mean age - years (±SD; min – max values) 33.7 (± 3.9; 24 – 42)

33.2 (± 4.0; 24 – 41)

34.4 (± 3.8; 25 – 42)

Mean time after stopping use of contraception – months (±SD; min – max values)

40.1 (±18.6; 0 – 81)*

41.6 (± 20.9; 0 – 81)**

37.5 (± 14.3; 0 – 60)***

Mean current BMI - kg/m2 (±SD; min – max values) 22.5 (±4.3;16.4 – 33.2)

22.4 (± 4.6; 16.8 – 33.2)

22.5 (± 4.1; 16.4 – 30.5)

Mean ideal BMI - kg/m2 (±SD; min – max values) 20.7 (±2.7;16.3– 27.0)

20.4 (± 2.7; 16.3 – 27.0)

20.9 (± 2.6; 17. – 26.0)

Abbreviation: SD, Standard deviation. *n = 48;; **n = 30;; ***n = 18.

F I G U R E 2  Distribution of Patients with Eating Disorder (ED), current ED or past ED. (ED, Eating disorders history past or current; Current ED, eating disorders in the last 28 days; History Of ED, whole life history of ED; History of AN, BN, whole life history of anorexia nervosa or bulimia)

ED N = 33

Current ED N = 13

(Including 11 history of

ED) History of ED (AN, BN, OSFED)

N = 31

History of AN, BN N = 12

6 of 10  |     AUDIER- BOURGAIN Et Al.

3.4 | Conjugal relationship

Based on the KMSS scale from 0 to 7, the average rating of mari- tal satisfaction was 5.9 (± 1.13, min =2.7, max =7) and 20 patients (32.8%) reported having a fully satisfactory marital relationship. These results were significantly related to the BISF- W sexual satis- faction score (p =.007).

4   |   D I S C U S S I O N

Among our recruitment of MAP consultants for unexplained infertil- ity or ovulation disorders, 54.1% of patients had suffered from or still suffered from a clinical or subclinical ED (OSFED), 13% still suf- fered from an ED, and 50.8% had a history of ED, while 19.7% had a history of a clinical ED: AN or BN.

In the study population, 50.8% of the patients reported a de- crease in sexual activity, 32.7% a decrease in interest, and 21.3% a decrease in sexual satisfaction. Nevertheless, in the general popu- lation, 10% of patients reported not having sexual activity, half of whom had not had any changes in sexual activity, suggesting a lack of normal sexual relations within the couple. There was no signif- icant difference between the ED group and the non- ED group in sexual frequency. On the other hand, patients suffering from or hav- ing suffered from an ED reported more problems affecting sexual function (BISFW D7 item) than that of the non- ED subjects but also more sexual desire. In the global population of our sample, 8.2% of patients had a depressive syndrome and 21.3% had anxiety.

Our study did not find any clear difference between the sexual behavior of patients affected by ED and that of the non- ED group, including the frequency of sexual intercourse. We found only a trend for patients with an AN or BN episode characterized in the past. It also seems important to point out that desiring a child and partici- pating in the MAP process also impact sexuality (Bokaie et al., 2015; Carvalho & Nobre, 2010; Czyżkowska et al., 2016; Winkelman et al., 2016).

The BISF- W scores correspond to the averages obtained in the Francophone validation study of the general population of nulli or primiparous women (mean Desire score =4.4 ± 2.2, Excitation =6.5 ± 2.4 Frequency =3.4 ± 2.0 Initiative =9.1 ± 3.6 Pleasure =4.7 ± 2.0 Satisfaction =8, 9 ± 2.3, Problems =3.6 ± 1.9)(Baudelot- Berrogain et al., 2006). The results obtained on the ED patients’ sex- uality are supported by the scientific literature. Indeed, this study found some problems related to sexuality among the patients suf- fering from or having suffered from an ED, compared to the non- ED group (anxiety, dissatisfaction, organic manifestations). However, it did not find avoidance of intercourse, except for women with a low BMI, which is probably due to a hormonal impact (Castellini et al., 2016; Mazzei et al., 2011; Pinheiro et al., 2010). Most of these studies used the female sexual function index for the eval- uation of sexuality. We chose the BISF- W because the FSFI items are mainly about physical problems during sexual intercourse, and neither the intercourse frequency nor the intercourse quality is taken into account. The scores obtained in the D1 section of the BISF- W (Thoughts/desire), relating to sexual thoughts, fantasies, and erotic dreams, in ED patients, are original and could be related

T A B L E 3  Frequency of intra vaginal intercourse depending on the presence of a clinical or subclinical ED, current or past, in the last month

Diagnostic

Non- ED group (n = 28) ED (n = 33)

Number of vaginal penetrations in the last month

Never 3 (11%) 3 (9%)

Once a month 2 (7%) 2 (6%)

2 to 3 times a month 3 (11%) 5 (15%)

Once a week 4 (14%) 5 (15%)

2 to 3 times a week 14 (50%) 18 (54.5%)

Once a day 1 (3.5%) 0

More than 1 time a day 1 (3.5%) 0

T A B L E 2  Dimension scores of BISF- W in the global population

thoughts/ desires arousal

frequency of sexual activity

receptivity, initiation

pleasure, orgasm

relationship satisfaction

problems affecting sexual function

Means 5.3 6.9 3.6 9.3 5.0 9.0 3.6

Standard deviation 2.5 2.3 1.9 3.2 2.1 2.3 1.9

Minimum 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Maximum 13 11 7 15 9 12 9

     |  7 of 10AUDIER- BOURGAIN Et Al.

to psychoanalytic theories of internalized excitement (Corcos, 2010; Haag, 1984; Kestemberg et al., 1989).

The concepts of pleasure and orgasm seemed to be confusing for several of our patients, with, for example, an orgasmic response score for sensual kisses (27.8%), which seems unlikely. This is not surprising given the prevalence of women who have never had an orgasm (5%, according to the French Public Opinion Institute, IFOP, 2016). Nevertheless, it reveals an ever- present lack of awareness of bodily responses during sexual intercourse, and suggests a lack of sex education.

Moreover, we questioned a large number of totally satisfactory marital relationships (maximal score for 32.8% patients). We ob- served high scores on the BISF- W for some of these patients who declared they were totally satisfied, questioning the authenticity of the answers to the marital quality questionnaire. The patients may have been afraid of a lack of confidentiality in their responses. On the other hand, in a more general process, we can question the role of denial in these patients and their desire to conform to a multilevel performance model, conveyed by the mass media.

The frequency of past or current ED in our cohort is much higher than that found in the literature, where the highest incidence was 20.7% (Freizinger et al., 2010). This difference could be explained by the recent changes in the criteria for a diagnosis of AN in the DSM5, including the withdrawal of amenorrhea from the diagnos- tic criteria. This increase in the prevalence of AN due to changes in the DSM5 criteria was also found in a recent epidemiological study (Ernst et al., 2017).

Only 8.2% of patients had the severe depressive syndrome, ap- proaching the frequency observed in the general population (Lépine et al., 2005). In contrast, 21.3% of patients had a known anxiety dis- order, which is 10 times higher than the prevalence in the general population (Lépine et al., 2005). No link was found between anxiety or depressive syndrome and the presence of an actual episode or history of ED. We believe that the absence of an observed link be- tween depression and ED is due to the study population. Indeed, patients consulting MAP are more likely, due to the psychological impact of the fertility course, to develop an anxio- depressive syn- drome (Boivin et al., 2011). Thus, the population of our sample is, on the whole, more likely to develop a depressive or anxiety syndrome.

4.1 | Strengths and limitations

Our study explored the sexuality of patients suffering from or having suffered from eating disorders, in a context of a desire for children and a follow- up in a medically assisted procreation program, com- pared to that of non- ED subjects, in the same context. This study is the first to our knowledge exploring the sexuality of these patients in this very particular context. Indeed, while several studies have ex- amined the sexuality of patients with ED, none of them had dealt with the reproductive dimension of sexual function. In particular, this highlighted the choice of some patients to turn to the techniques of MAP to conceive, and thus to overcome their sexual dysfunctions.

However, our research has some limitations: it is a single- center study, based on self- assessment questionnaires. Moreover, the low numbers forced us to collect categories in order to obtain larger groups, allowing for comparisons to be made. Thus, for our main ob- jective, we had to make two groups of sexual intercourse frequen- cies (less than one intravaginal relationship per month or more than two). The recommendations of the MAP are two to three sexual in- tercourses per week with vaginal penetration. Group 2: "conducive to procreation" is therefore not adequate in following the current recommendations. Nevertheless, it seems to us unrepresentative to group together in the group "not conducive to procreation" women having no intercourse per month and those having between two and three. On the other hand, we started from the principle that vaginal penetration was equivalent to intravaginal ejaculation, which is not necessarily the case.

The questionnaire did not sufficiently explore questions about a disorder of body image. These questions could be developed in the future and could be a key point linking sexual dysfunction and ED. Indeed, we think that the disturbance of the body image, in that it is the result of a lack of identity construction, is the com- mon point between these two pathologies, EDs (Fairburn & Harrison, 2003; Gutiérrez & Carrera, 2016) and sexual dysfunction (Ackard et al., 2000; Morgan et al., 1995; Robbins & Reissing, 2017; Tolosa- Sola et al., 2017), leading, each independently of the other, to fertility disorders (Figure 2). It is important to take into account that women in this type of care course are often under hormonal stimulation. However, this type of treatment has a non- negligible body image impact. Thus, the large proportion of patients preoccu- pied with their body image, with a desire for weight loss, can only be partly explained by these conditions.

We have chosen, for ethical reasons, not to look for a history of sexual abuse. Indeed, any disturbing results would have imposed the necessity of a proposal of care that we were not able to provide. However, the presence of a history of sexual trauma in ED patients is frequent and also impacts the sexuality of these patients (Castellini et al., 2013).

5   |   C O N C L U S I O N A N D I M P L I C AT I O N S

Our study is the first to explore the sexuality of patients suffer- ing from or having suffered from an ED and desiring a child, seek- ing assisted procreation. In this population of patients using MAP techniques, there is no avoidance of sexuality, as it can be classi- cally described. On the other hand, their sexuality is described as more problematic, with a probable psychological impact at this level within the couple's relationship, which can cause a feeling of malaise in these patients.

Currently, in France, social security does not reimburse consul- tations with a psychologist, but most MAP units have a psychologist to support couples who explicitly express a desire to consult one. This recourse is, however, quite rare. We believe that most couples are afraid to seek this care for fear of delaying MAP interventions

8 of 10  |     AUDIER- BOURGAIN Et Al.

or seeming to be too vulnerable. A systematic proposal to the cou- ples of support in space independent of the MAP service could be valuable.

In the future, we would like to continue to explore the psycho- logical difficulties encountered by patients, and more generally by couples, who are consulting for MAP. The interventions currently proposed, in terms of psychotherapeutic or sexological care, al- though they have the merit of existing, appear in the eyes of these patients to be insufficient. Other studies will eventually suggest new ways of care and support, in order to further personalize the thera- peutic proposals.

C O N F L I C T S O F I N T E R E S T No author of this article has any conflict of interest, financial or oth- erwise, related to the submitted work.

P E E R R E V I E W The peer review history for this article is available at https://publo ns.com/publo n/10.1002/brb3.2196.

D ATA AVA I L A B I L I T Y S TAT E M E N T The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

O R C I D Marie Audier- Bourgain https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4739-3353

R E F E R E N C E S Abraham, S. (1998). Sexuality and reproduction in bulimia nervosa pa-

tients over 10 years. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 44(3– 4), 491– 502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022 - 3999(97)00272 - 9

Ackard, D. M., Kearney- Cooke, A., & Peterson, C. B. (2000). Effect of body image and self- image on women’s sexual behaviors. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28(4), 422– 429.

Bates, J. E., Freeland, C. A., & Lounsbury, M. L. (1979). Measurement of infant difficultness. Child Development, 50(3), 794– 803. https://doi. org/10.2307/1128946

Baudelot- Berrogain, N., Roquejoffre, S., Gamé, X., Mallet, R., Mouzin, M., Bertrand, N., Plante, P., Sarramon, J.- P., Rischmann, P., & Malavaud, B. (2006). Linguistic validation of the « Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women ». Progrès En Urologie: Journal De L’association Française D’urologie Et De La Société Française D’urologie, 16(2), 174– 183.

Beerens, V., Vermassen, A., Vrieze, E., & Pieters, G. (2014). Sexuality in eating- disorder patients. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie, 56(4), 268– 272.

Boivin, J., Griffiths, E., & Venetis, C. A. (2011). Emotional distress in in- fertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies : Meta- analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. BMJ, 342(feb23 1), d223– d223. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d223

Bokaie, M., Simbar, M., & Yassini Ardekani, S. M. (2015). Sexual behavior of infertile women : A qualitative study. Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 13(10), 645– 656.

Bruneau, G., Vaisse, C., Caraty, A., & Monget, P. (1999). La leptine: Une clef pour la reproduction. médecine/sciences, 15(2), 191. https://doi. org/10.4267/10608/ 1310

Bulik, C. M., Reba, L., Siega- Riz, A.- M., & Reichborn- Kjennerud, T. (2005). Anorexia nervosa : Definition, epidemiology, and cycle of risk. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 37, S2- S9; discussion S20- 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20107

Carter, F. A., Carter, J. D., Luty, S. E., Jordan, J., McIntosh, V. V. W., Bartram, A. F., Mulder, R. T., McKenzie, J. M., & Bulik, C. M. (2007). What is worse for your sex life : Starving, being depressed, or a new baby?. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 40(7), 664– 667. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20394

Carvalho, J., & Nobre, P. (2010). Predictors of women’s sexual desire: The role of psychopathology, cognitive- emotional determinants, relation- ship dimensions, and medical factors. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(2 Pt 2), 928– 937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743- 6109.2009.01568.x

Castellini, G., Lelli, L., Lo Sauro, C., Fioravanti, G., Vignozzi, L., Maggi, M., Faravelli, C., & Ricca, V. (2012). Anorectic and bulimic patients suffer from relevant sexual dysfunctions. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 9(10), 2590– 2599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743- 6109.2012.02888.x

Castellini, G., Lelli, L., Ricca, V., & Maggi, M. (2016). Sexuality in eat- ing disorders patients : Etiological factors, sexual dysfunction and identity issues. A systematic review. Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation, 25(2), 71– 90. https://doi.org/10.1515/hmbci - 2015- 0055

Castellini, G., Lo Sauro, C., Lelli, L., Godini, L., Vignozzi, L., Rellini, A. H., Faravelli, C., Maggi, M., & Ricca, V. (2013). Childhood sexual abuse moderates the relationship between sexual functioning and eating disorder psychopathology in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa : A 1- year follow- up study. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 10(9), 2190– 2200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12232

Castellini, G., Lo Sauro, C., Mannucci, E., Ravaldi, C., Rotella, C. M., Faravelli, C., & Ricca, V. (2011). Diagnostic crossover and outcome predictors in eating disorders according to DSM- IV and DSM- V pro- posed criteria : A 6- year follow- up study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 73(3), 270– 279. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013 e3182 0a1838

Corcos, M. (2010). Le corps absent approche psychosomatique des troubles des conduites alimentaires. Dunod.

Czyżkowska, A., Awruk, K., & Janowski, K. (2016). Sexual satisfaction and sexual reactivity in infertile women : the contribution of the dy- adic functioning and clinical variables. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, 9(4), 465– 476.

Derogatis, L. R., & Conklin- Powers, B. (1998). Psychological assessment measures of female sexual functioning in clinical trials. International Journal of Impotence Research, 10(Suppl 2), S111– 116.

Easter, A., Solmi, F., Bye, A., Taborelli, E., Corfield, F., Schmidt, U., Treasure, J., & Micali, N. (2015). Antenatal and postnatal psycho- pathology among women with current and past eating disorders: longitudinal patterns: longitudinal patterns psychopathology during the perinatal period. European Eating Disorders Review, 23(1), 19– 27. https://doi.org/10.1002/erv.2328

Ekeroth, K., Clinton, D., Norring, C., & Birgegård, A. (2013). Clinical char- acteristics and distinctiveness of DSM- 5 eating disorder diagnoses: Findings from a large naturalistic clinical database. Journal of Eating Disorders, 1(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050- 2974- 1- 31

Ernst, V., Bürger, A., & Hammerle, F. (2017). Prevalence and severity of eating disorders: A comparison of DSM- IV and DSM- 5 among German adolescents. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 50(11), 1255– 1263. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.22780

ESHRE Capri Workshop Group (2006). Nutrition and reproduction in women. Human Reproduction Update, 12(3), 193– 207. https://doi. org/10.1093/humup d/dmk003

Fairburn, C. G., & Harrison, P. J. (2003). Eating disorders. Lancet (London, England), 361(9355), 407– 416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140 - 6736(03)12378 - 1

Freizinger, M., Franko, D. L., Dacey, M., Okun, B., & Domar, A. D. (2010). The prevalence of eating disorders in infertile women. Fertility and Sterility, 93(1), 72– 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertn stert.2008.09.055

Godart, N. T., Legleye, S., Huas, C., Coté, S. M., Choquet, M., Falissard, B., & Touchette, E. (2013). Epidemiology of anorexia nervosa in a French community- based sample of 39,542 adolescents. Open

     |  9 of 10AUDIER- BOURGAIN Et Al.

Journal of Epidemiology, 03(02), 53– 61. https://doi.org/10.4236/ ojepi.2013.32009

Gonidakis, F., Kravvariti, V., & Varsou, E. (2015). Sexual function of women suffering from anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(4), 368– 378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00926 23X.2014.915904

Gutiérrez, E., & Carrera, O. (2016). Anorexia nervosa and body- image disturbance. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(2), e9– e10. https://doi. org/10.1016/S2215 - 0366(15)00581 - 7

Haag, G., & (Éds)., (1984). Travail de la métaphore: Identification, interpréta- tion. Denoël.

Haycraft, E., & Blissett, J. (2010). Eating disorder symptoms and par- enting styles. Appetite, 54(1), 221– 224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. appet.2009.11.009

Hawton, K. (1980). Disorders of sexual desire and other new concepts and techniques in sex therapy. by helen singer kaplan. new york: Brunner/Mazel. 1979. Pp 237. $17.50. - psychosexual disorders: A review. by M. T. Haslam, illinois: Charles C. Thomas. 1979. Pp 191. $19.75. British Journal of Psychiatry, 137(3), 296– 296. http://dx.doi. org/10.1192/s0007 12500 0105665

Kestemberg, E., Kestemberg, J., Decobert, S., & Lebovici, S. (1989). La faim et le corps : Une étude psychanalytique de l’anorexie mentale. Presses universitaires de France.

Kreipe, R. E., Strauss, J., Hodgman, C. H., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Menstrual cycle abnormalities and subclinical eating disorders : A preliminary report. Psychosomatic Medicine, 51(1), 81– 86.

Lai, B. P., & Tang, C. S. (2008). The negative impact of maternal bulimic symptoms on parenting behavior. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 65(2), 181– 189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsyc hores.2008.04.003

Lamas, C., Chambry, J., Nicolas, I., Frydman, R., Jeammet, P., & Corcos, M. (2006). Alexithymia in infertile women. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 27(1), 23– 30. https://doi. org/10.1080/01674 82050 0238112

Leinonen, J. A., Solantaus, T. S., & Punamäki, R.- L. (2003). Parental men- tal health and children’s adjustment : The quality of marital interac- tion and parenting as mediating factors. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 44(2), 227– 241.

Lépine, J.- P., Gasquet, I., Kovess, V., Arbabzadeh- Bouchez, S., Nègre- Pagès, L., Nachbaur, G., & Gaudin, A.- F. (2005). Prévalence et co- morbidité des troubles psychiatriques dans la population générale française : Résultats de l’étude épidémiologique ESEMeD/ MHEDEA 2000/ (ESEMeD). L’encéphale, 31(2), 182– 194. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0013 - 7006(05)82385 - 1

Löwe, B., Zipfel, S., Buchholz, C., Dupont, Y., Reas, D. L., & Herzog, W. (2001). Long- term outcome of anorexia nervosa in a prospective 21- year follow- up study. Psychological Medicine, 31(5), 881– 890. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0033 29170 100407X

Mazzei, C., Castellini, G., Benni, L., Godini, L., Lazzeretti, L., Pracucci, C., Talamba, G. A., Ricca, V., & Faravelli, C. (2011). Sexuality and eating disorders. Rivista Di Psichiatria, 46(2), 122– 128. https://doi. org/10.1708/626.7312

Morgan, C. D., Wiederman, M. W., & Pryor, T. L. (1995). Sexual func- tioning and attitudes of eating- disordered women : A follow- up study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 21(2), 67– 77. https://doi. org/10.1080/00926 23950 8404386

Nichols, C. W., Schumm, W. R., Schectman, K. L., & Grigsby, C. C. (1983). Characteristics of responses to the kansas marital satisfaction scale by a sample of 84 married mothers. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 567– 572. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.567

Pinheiro, A. P., Raney, T. J., Thornton, L. M., Fichter, M. M., Berrettini, W. H., Goldman, D., Halmi, K. A., Kaplan, A. S., Strober, M., Treasure, J., Woodside, D. B., Kaye, W. H., & Bulik, C. M. (2010). Sexual function- ing in women with eating disorders. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 43(2), 123– 129. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20671

Ray, A., Shah, A., Gudi, A., & Homburg, R. (2012). Unexplained infertility : An update and review of practice. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 24(6), 591– 602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.021

Resch, M., Nagy, G., Pintér, J., Szendei, G., & Haász, P. (1999). Eating dis- orders and depression in Hungarian women with menstrual disorders and infertility. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 20(3), 152– 157. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674 82990 9075589

Ricca, V., Castellini, G., Lo Sauro, C., Mannucci, E., Ravaldi, C., Rotella, F., & Faravelli, C. (2010). Cognitive- behavioral therapy for threshold and subthreshold anorexia nervosa : A three- year follow- up study. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 79(4), 238– 248. https://doi. org/10.1159/00031 5129

Rø, Ø., Reas, D. L., & Stedal, K. (2015). Eating Disorder Examination questionnaire (EDE- Q) in Norwegian adults : Discrimination be- tween female controls and eating disorder patients: Global EDE- Q cut- off. European Eating Disorders Review, 23(5), 408– 412. https:// doi.org/10.1002/erv.2372

Robbins, A.- R., & Reissing, E. D. (2017). Appearance dissatisfaction, body appreciation, and sexual health in women across adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(3), 703– 714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1050 8- 017- 0982- 9

Rosen, J. C. (1996). Body image assessment and treatment in con- trolled studies of eating disorders. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 20(4), 331– 343.

Schumm, W. R., Anderson, S. A., Benigas, J. E., McCutchen, M. B., Griffin, C. L., Morris, J. E., & Race, G. S. (1985). Criterion- related validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Psychological Reports, 56(3), 718. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1985.56.3.718

Stewart, D. E., Robinson, E., Goldbloom, D. S., & Wright, C. (1990). Infertility and eating disorders. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 163(4 Pt 1), 1196– 1199. https://doi. org/10.1016/0002- 9378(90)90688 - 4

Taylor, J. F., Rosen, R. C., & Leiblum, S. R. (1994). Self- report assessment of female sexual function : Psychometric evaluation of the brief index of sexual functioning for women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 23(6), 627– 643. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF015 41816

Thonneau, P., Marchand, S., Tallec, A., Ferial, M. L., Ducot, B., Lansac, J., Lopes, P., Tabaste, J. M., & Spira, A. (1991). Incidence and main causes of infertility in a resident population (1,850,000) of three French re- gions (1988– 1989). Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 6(6), 811– 816. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfor djour nals.humrep.a137433

Tolosa- Sola, I., Gunnard, K., Giménez Muniesa, C., Casals, L., Grau, A., & Farré, J. M. (2017). Body dissatisfaction and eating disorder symp- tomatology : Which factors interfere with sexuality in women with eating disorders?. Journal of Health Psychology, 24(11), 1526– 1535. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591 05317 695425

Untas, A., Aguirrezabal, M., Chauveau, P., Leguen, E., Combe, C., & Rascle, N. (2009). Anxiété et dépression en hémodialyse : Validation de l’Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Néphrologie & Thérapeutique, 5(3), 193– 200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. nephro.2009.01.007

Vall, E., & Wade, T. D. (2016). Predictors of treatment outcome in individ- uals with eating disorders : A systematic review and meta- analysis. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49(4), 432– 433. https:// doi.org/10.1002/eat.22518

Watson, H. J., Von Holle, A., Hamer, R. M., Knoph Berg, C., Torgersen, L., Magnus, P., Stoltenberg, C., Sullivan, P., Reichborn- Kjennerud, T., & Bulik, C. M. (2013). Remission, continuation and incidence of eating disorders during early pregnancy : A validation study in a population- based birth cohort. Psychological Medicine, 43(08), 1723– 1734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033 29171 2002516

Wiederman, M. W. (1996). Women, sex, and food : A review of research on eating disorders and sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 33(4), 301– 311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224 49960 9551847

10 of 10  |     AUDIER- BOURGAIN Et Al.

Winkelman, W. D., Katz, P. P., Smith, J. F., & Rowen, T. S. (2016). The Sexual Impact of Infertility Among Women Seeking Fertility Care. Sexual Medicine, 4(3), e190– e197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. esxm.2016.04.001

Zerwas, S., Von Holle, A., Torgersen, L., Reichborn- Kjennerud, T., Stoltenberg, C., & Bulik, C. M. (2012). Maternal eating disorders and infant temperament : Findings from the Norwegian mother and child cohort study. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 45(4), 546– 555. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.20983

Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depres- sion scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361– 370. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1600- 0447.1983.tb097 16.x

How to cite this article: Audier- Bourgain M, Baubet T, Pham- Scottez A, Corcos M, Nicolas I. Eating disorders and sexuality: A quantitative study in a French medically assisted procreation course. Brain Behav. 2021;11:e02196. https://doi. org/10.1002/brb3.2196

Copyright of Brain & Behavior is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.