Old Testatement Research paper
PAPER EVALUATION FORM
Student: Letter grade: Score:
|
A (90-100) |
B (80-89) |
C (70-79) |
D (60-69) |
F (0-59) |
RESEARCH
|
More relevant sources than required. |
Required amount of relevant sources. |
Less than required. |
Irrelevant sources. |
No sources. |
|
Documentation with accurate notes. |
Adequate for the nature of the assignment. |
Notes could be more thorough. |
Learn to do a better job on documenting sources. |
Must identify sources. |
Comment: ____________________________________________________________________________
ORGANIZATION
|
Introduction, body, and conclusion are clear and supportive of one another. |
Introduction, body, and conclusion are consistent. |
Introduction and conclusion are not coherent. |
No introduction or conclusion. |
No introduction and conclusion. |
|
Thesis is clear and stimulates interest. |
Coherent, but no unique insights developed. |
Thesis is acceptable but rather conventional. |
Thesis is not clear. |
There is no thesis. |
|
Outline on the content page is a good reflection on the thesis. |
Outline generally supports the thesis. |
Outline indicates carelessness in preparation. |
Outline does not support the thesis. |
There is no outline or content page. |
Comment: ____________________________________________________________________________
WRITING
|
The written English is polished with a superior style and vocabulary. |
Good English prose. |
Grammatical problems must be weeded out. |
Writing style indicates too little attention to writing and needs to be improved. |
The written English is very poor. |
|
Typing is superior with no errors. |
Typing is acceptable. Mistakes are minimal. |
The number of corrections mars the paper’s appearance. |
Many typographical and/or punctuation errors. |
Paper does not represent the minimum standard for college level papers. |
Comment: ____________________________________________________________________________
APPEARANCE
|
Paper is attractive to the eye and reflects great personal pride in presentation. |
Paper looks pretty well prepared. |
Met the minimum requirement for the paper in the syllabus. |
Acceptable, but did not meet the minimum requirement. |
Paper was prepared un professionally. |
Comment: ____________________________________________________________________________
OVERALL IMPRESSION
|
Superior, professional looking paper. Superb analysis and evaluation. |
Above average analysis and evaluation. Only a few weaknesses are evident. |
Paper of average quality. Increased thought about the material is in order. |
Below average. Little effort to interact with the material. Many weaknesses in this work. |
Unacceptable for the nature of the assignment. |
Comment: ____________________________________________________________________________