Research paper

profileKevinLiang
Researchpaper.zip

348_Guidelines for the Final Paper.docx

Guidelines for the Final Paper

The requirements:

The paper should be 7 to 10 pages, not including your title page and references page. (A little longer is okay, but definitely try to avoid fluff and padding as much as you can; shorter than 7 pages would be kind of strange),

Typed and double or 1.5 spaced. Proofread for typos, grammar and other errors, and for flow and development. 

Use APA format (see the example paper under "files" or attached below).  Go ahead and do a title page—you'll need them for the more formal, longer papers you'll write for advanced classes.  The abstract is optional, but writing an abstract really helps you see if you've clearly addressed your questions and organized your research. 

Provide complete references for all sources cited. The goal is for your reader to be able to find any sources themselves, so include journal titles, volume number and pages.  Remember they may not be able to access the links you provide (especially any database links, which are useless to anyone who doesn't have access).  If you're using chapters from books, cite the chapter (and for edited books, the chapter authors) AND the book.

Remember, you must have at least 5 peer reviewed, academic research sources.  Typically, these are academic journal articles, but some book chapters will qualify.  You can use as many other sources as you need or want, but be careful with how you use them; that is, sort out popular press, opinion, theoretical assertions, or beliefs from evidence-based information.  Avoid over-reliance on one or two authors.  Make an effort to find and include differing or contradictory findings or interpretations, especially for topics that are less settled or more theoretically "charged."

If you're citing sources that are within other sources, you must provide a reference for these as well. Good practice is to say something like "cited in" or "quoted in" in your in-text citation, then provide the source in which you found that secondary reference. (Best practice is to locate and read that source for yourself, but I'll cope with some reality here.)  

General guidelines:

Start with and provide some context for your question (or topic).  That is, say what you were researching and something about why it matters. If it’s not obvious, go ahead state how it addresses the concerns of cultural psychology. A little bit of personal importance is okay, but you should keep that under control and focus mainly on the more general relevance of the question (to a population, to the field, to social policy, et cetera). Your research should have helped you get a sense of the nature of the concerns in the area, what the key questions or debates are, or the problem that drives the inquiry.  Provide a summary of that context.

Figure out the most sensible way to present your findings and organize the presentation accordingly. (Is it themes, a debate, a dilemma, or is it more a matter of building up pieces of evidence?).  Present the relevant findings in an even-handed way (you can draw your conclusions at the end of the paper).  Give the reader enough information to make their own judgments about the quality of the research, the strength of the argument, and the generalizability of the findings.  If you end up with a complex "portrait" of the research, then take a paragraph to provide a summary of the current state of the research (if it's straightforward, you may not need to do that).  Paraphrase and use your own words as much as you can (but don't mistranslate!).  Avoid excessive quotation (it reads as if you don't really understand what your sources are talking about).  Generally speaking, reserve quoting for especially well-phrased points, or for statements or conclusions that seem unique or idiosyncratic to the author. Avoid flowery prose, and generally avoid adjectives and adverbs as much as possible--go for that "objective," or even terse, writing style you see in your sources.

Then, provide your discussion and conclusions of what you found. If the answer seems clear, then great!  Say that. If things are less clear, then say that and provide some discussion of the debate or contradictions, what still needs to be determined, and your assessment of what can be safely said at this point.  In this section (and in the introduction) some conservative use of "I" is okay, but still be sure to support your conclusions or interpretations. (Again, think about your reader—and you should think of that reader as a "public," not just as me, your teacher--and how well they'll be able to follow your analyses and conclusions, and how well they could trust them.) 

That's the general formula!

In this module you will also find a “Sample APA paper” that is a cheat sheet for APA formatting questions. You will also find a very good student (but not perfect!) paper (from another quarter) to perhaps prime you a bit (but it’s not a “template” or “recipe” for your paper!).

Research paper.docx

Research Paper (200 points)

Yes, it is a research paper. I’ll provide guidelines for this and we will discuss it in class, but the main idea is that you (a) choose some well-defined topic related to topics covered in class (see a suggestive list below), (b) do a literature search (on PsychInfo, for instance, though other databases may be relevant) to find at least five peer-reviewed scholarly articles or book chapters on that topic, and (c) write up an integrated and thoughtful literature review.

The final paper should be around 7-10 pages in length, typed (of course), 1.5 or double-spaced, APA format. 

Important breakdown information:

You will need to turn in an annotated bibliography with your topic and complete references and annotation of your scholarly sources. This should begin with your proposed topic, including a brief description of the construct of interest and how it relates to cultural psychology.  The bibliography should contain the full citation of each source in APA format and a 1-2 paragraph description/summary, written by you(don’t just cut and paste the abstracts) of the article or chapter.  In your description, pay particular attention to information that is directly relevant to your project aims.  You may also use newspaper or popular magazine articles to help lead you toward scholarship or to add a little “texture” to your paper, but these will not count as scholarly sources (and should not be included in your annotated bibliography, but of course should be cited in the final paper). (50 points) 

Late papers will lose 5% per day for the first two days, 10% thereafter. It may make sense to take a 5 or 10% hit for lateness if it means your paper is going to be a lot better for the extra time. 

TOPIC.docx

Running head: Self-enhancement and self-improvement

Self-enhancement and self-improvement

Zihao Dou

Self-enhancement and self-improvement

I wanted to explore the influence of culture on the self. Self-enhancement and self-improvement is something I'm going to talk about. self-enhancement is a way to become stronger and it's a way to think positively about yourself. However, self-improvement is a way to make others see you more positively. So these two ways of life are reflected between the independent culture and the collective culture respectively.

In Western cultures, self-esteem is seen as the primary source of happiness, so motivation for self-improvement is often a way to maintain a positive view of oneself. Self-promotion strategies usually include downward social comparison, compensatory self-promotion, discounting, external attribution, and enjoying reflective glory. Collectivist cultures, by contrast, tend to emphasize self-improvement as a major motivator in their lives. This motivation usually comes from a desire not to lose face and to be positive in a social group

I have experienced these two different ways of life since I was born. I have only been in the United States for four years, and before that I had lived in a collectivist Asian culture. In Asian collectivism, we all need to constantly contribute to our existing "organizations", such as our classes. We all need to constantly improve ourselves and make our organizations stronger. However, after coming to the United States, I felt a different way of life. A lot of people around me are very powerful. They are constantly enhance themselves. These two ways of life make me have great interest. It's the same thing, but the goal and the way are completely different. This is why I want to explore this topic.

References

Heine, S. J. (2011). Cultural Psychology. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Konrath, S. (2012, in press) Self-esteem, culturally defined. In Cultural Sociology of Mental Illness: An A-to-Z Guide, Sage Reference. https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/10089/Konrath_self_esteem_overview.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y#:~:text=People%20from%20more%20collectivistic%20nations,%2C%20rather%20than%20self%2D%20esteem.&text=Interestingly%2C%20when%20implicit%20measures%20of,cultures%2C%20no%20differences%20are%20found.

Kurman, J. (2001). Self-Enhancement: Is it Restricted to Individualistic Cultures? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27(12), 1705–1716. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012712013

Kurman, J. (2003). Why is Self-Enhancement Low in Certain Collectivist Cultures?: An Investigation of Two Competing Explanations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology34(5), 496–510.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103256474

Wikipedia contributors. (2020, November 7). Cultural psychology. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 11:25, November 13, 2020, from  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cultural_psychology&oldid=987533698