PERSONAL SWOT Analysis

profilelazier
ResearchPaper-PersonalSWOTAnalysisGradingRubric.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

SWOT Analysis: Identify in essay format, your mgt. SWOT.

20 to >14 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly identified in essay format, your mgt. SWOT.

14 to >5 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily identified in essay format, your mgt. SWOT.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently identified in essay format, your mgt. SWOT.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not identify, in essay format, your mgt SWOT.

20 pts

Develop TOWS strategies: Present 4 TOWS matrix strategies in essay format from your SWOT information.

20 to >14 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly presented 4 TOWS matrix strategies in essay format from your SWOT information.

14 to >5 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily presented 4 TOWS matrix strategies in essay format from your SWOT information.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently presented 4 TOWS matrix strategies in essay format from your SWOT information.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not present 4 TOWS matrix strategies in essay format from your SWOT information.

20 pts

Apply biblical integration to SWOT and TOWS sections.

10 to >7 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly applied biblical integration to SWOT and TOWS sections.

7 to >3 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily applied biblical integration to SWOT and TOWS sections.

3 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently applied biblical integration to SWOT and TOWS sections.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not apply biblical integration to SWOT and TOWS sections.

10 pts

Abstract 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly articulated a clear and comprehensive overview of the paper’s content, linked to management with a focus on your findings.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily articulated some critical components of the paper, linked to management with a focus on your findings.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently articulated critical components of the paper linked to management with a focus on your findings.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not present concepts clearly. Did not provide a comprehensive overview of the paper’s content. Missing a link to management. No focus on your findings.

5 pts

Research Paper: Personal SWOT Analysis Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Points

Introduction 10 to >6 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.

6 to >2 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.

2 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is missing from the end of your introduction section.

0 pts

Not Present

Not present.

10 pts

Conclusion 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

5 pts

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count

15 to >9 pts

Advanced

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count is thorough.

9 to >5 pts

Proficient

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count is satisfactory.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count is insufficient.

0 pts

Not Present

There are many errors in mechanics, composition, & word count.

15 pts

APA Formatting 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

APA formatting is thorough.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

APA formatting is satisfactory.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

APA formatting is insufficient.

0 pts

Not Present

APA formatting does not exist.

5 pts

Research Paper: Personal SWOT Analysis Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Points

References 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

References meet requirements in number and quality.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

References almost meet requirements in number and quality.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

References do not meet requirements in number and quality.

0 pts

Not Present

Missing references.

5 pts

Citations 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

Most statements of fact are supported by citations.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

Many statements of fact are supported by citations.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Some statements of fact are supported by citations.

0 pts

Not Present

Citations are rare, repetitious or non-existent.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

Research Paper: Personal SWOT Analysis Grading Rubric