Narcissistic Leadership Assignment

Criteria Ratings Points

Narcissistic Leadership

40 to >36 pts

Advanced

The explanation of narcissistic leadership is clearly presented and discussed in detail.

36 to >32 pts

Proficient

The explanation of narcissistic leadership is presented and discussed appropriately.

32 to >0 pts

Developing

The explanation of narcissistic leadership is unclear or fairly clear but discussed too broadly or does not meet expectations.

0 pts

Not Present

40 pts

Covenant Leadership

40 to >36 pts

Advanced

Defines covenant leadership and compares and contrasts the traits of a narcissistic leader with that of a covenant leader. Incorporates police organizational alignment with covenant leadership. Demonstrates Christian worldview integration throughout the covenant leadership section.

36 to >32 pts

Proficient

Loosely defines covenant leadership and mentions the traits of a narcissistic leader and that of a covenant leader. Mentions police organizational alignment to covenant leadership. Demonstrates Christian worldview mentioned throughout the covenant leadership section.

32 to >0 pts

Developing

Covenant leadership is not adequately defined and the comparison and contrast of the traits of a narcissistic leader with that of a covenant leader are not evident. Only minimally incorporates police organizational alignment with covenant leadership. Christian worldview integration is not mentioned in the covenant leadership section.

0 pts

Not Present

40 pts

Organization 30 to >27 pts

Advanced

The introductory paragraph contains a strong thesis statement and provides an overview of the paper. The conclusion is strong and clearly summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper. Major points are stated clearly; are supported by specific details, examples, or analyses; and are organized logically.

27 to >24 pts

Proficient

The introduction paragraph contains a thesis statement. The conclusion summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper. Major points are stated; are generally supported by details, examples, or analyses; and are organized logically.

24 to >0 pts

Developing

The thesis statement and overview of the paper need improvement. The conclusion does not adequately summarize the research presented in the body of the paper. Major points are somewhat stated; are loosely supported by specific details, examples, but are not organized logically.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Research Paper: Narcissistic Leadership Grading Rubric | CJUS610_B01_202320

Criteria Ratings Points

Reasoning & Support

30 to >27 pts

Advanced

The Socratic and otherwise critical method is applied to the text correctly. Contextual factors are considered. Key terms are defined. Complex issues are navigated with precision. The text is carefully applied in a contemporary setting. Sources are evaluated critically. Shows an integration of the subject matter and critical thinking.

27 to >24 pts

Proficient

The Socratic and otherwise critical method is applied to the text. Contextual factors are considered. Key terms are defined. Complex issues are recognized. The text is applied in a contemporary setting. Sources are used correctly. Shows a reflection of the subject matter, and critical thinking.

24 to >0 pts

Developing

The Socratic and otherwise critical method is generally or not applied to the text. Contextual factors are weakly considered and lacking in some significant areas. Complex issues are overlooked or handled without care. The application is stretched or not applied. Sources are used but not critically evaluated. Shows only a mention of the subject matter, critical thinking is absent.

0 pts

Not Present

30 pts

Length 15 to >13 pts

Advanced

Content amounts to more than 8-10 double-spaced pages of text, excluding the title page, abstract, and references.

13 to >11 pts

Proficient

Content amounts to at least 8 double-spaced pages of text, excluding the title page, abstract, and references.

11 to >0 pts

Developing

There are fewer than 8 double-spaced pages of text, excluding the title page, abstract, and references.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Mechanics 15 to >13 pts

Advanced

No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate.

13 to >11 pts

Proficient

Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate.

11 to >0 pts

Developing

Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Research Paper: Narcissistic Leadership Grading Rubric | CJUS610_B01_202320

Criteria Ratings Points

APA Format 15 to >13 pts

Advanced

Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, Table of Contents, Appendices, and Bibliography are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

13 to >11 pts

Proficient

Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors. Cover page, Table of Contents, Appendices, and Bibliography are present with few errors. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12-point Times New Roman font.

11 to >0 pts

Developing

Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, Table of Contents, Appendices, and Bibliography is included though several errors are present. Paper is double-spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Research 15 to >13 pts

Advanced

Academic primary and secondary materials are used well and include academic materials such as journal articles and books (10 or more).

13 to >11 pts

Proficient

Academic primary and secondary materials are used and include academic journal articles and books (at least 10).

11 to >0 pts

Developing

Academic sources are used though popular sources are also incorporated (fewer than 10).

0 pts

Not Present

15 pts

Total Points: 200

Research Paper: Narcissistic Leadership Grading Rubric | CJUS610_B01_202320