RESEARCH PAPER: ABRIDGED LITERATURE REVIEW

Criteria Ratings Points

Evaluate the effective application of primary management concepts to the assigned topic. Describe, contrast, and critique major findings and key theories. Identify controversial questions

60 to >48 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly evaluated the effective application of primary management concepts to the assigned topic. Described, contrasted, and critiqued major findings and key theories. Identified controversial questions.

48 to >10 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily evaluated the effective application of primary management concepts to the assigned topic. Described, contrasted, and critiqued major findings and key theories. Identified controversial questions.

10 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently evaluated the effective application of primary management concepts to the assigned topic. Described, contrasted, and critiqued major findings and key theories. Identified controversial questions.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not evaluate the effective application of primary management concepts to the assigned topic. Did not describe, contrast, and critique major findings and key theories. Did not identify controversial questions.

60 pts

Demonstrate a Synthesis of Christian Literature and Secular Knowledge.

15 to >10 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly demonstrated a synthesis of Christian Literature and Secular Knowledge.

10 to >5 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily demonstrated a synthesis of Christian Literature and Secular Knowledge.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently demonstrated a synthesis of Christian Literature and Secular Knowledge.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not demonstrate a synthesis of Christian Literature and Secular Knowledge.

15 pts

Abstract 10 to >8 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly articulated a clear and comprehensive overview of the paper’s content, linked to management with a focus on your findings.

8 to >1 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily articulated some critical components of the paper, linked to management with a focus on your findings.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently articulated critical components of the paper linked to management with a focus on your findings.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not present concepts clearly. Did not provide a comprehensive overview of the paper’s content. Missing a link to management. No focus on your findings.

10 pts

Research Paper: Abridged Literature Review Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Points

Introduction 10 to >8 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.

8 to >1 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is at the end of your introduction section.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently presented a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A properly constructed thesis statement with supporting citation is missing from your introduction section.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not present a detailed description of the problems and issues central to the assignment. A thesis statement is missing from your introduction section.

10 pts

Conclusion 10 to >8 pts

Advanced

Thoroughly stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

8 to >1 pts

Proficient

Satisfactorily stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

Insufficiently stated the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

0 pts

Not Present

Did not state the answer to the problem which you stated in your introduction.

10 pts

Mechanics, Composition & Word Count

15 to >10 pts

Advanced

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count is thorough.

10 to >5 pts

Proficient

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count is satisfactory.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Mechanics, Composition, & Word Count is insufficient.

0 pts

Not Present

There are many errors in mechanics, composition, & word count.

15 pts

APA Formatting

10 to >8 pts

Advanced

APA formatting is thorough.

8 to >1 pts

Proficient

APA formatting is satisfactory.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

APA formatting is insufficient.

0 pts

Not Present

APA formatting does not exist.

10 pts

References 5 to >3 pts

Advanced

References meet requirements in number and quality.

3 to >1 pts

Proficient

References almost meet requirements in number and quality.

1 to >0 pts

Developing

References do not meet requirements in number and quality.

0 pts

Not Present

Missing references.

5 pts

Research Paper: Abridged Literature Review Grading Rubric

Criteria Ratings Points

Citations 15 to >10 pts

Advanced

Most statements of fact are supported by citations.

10 to >5 pts

Proficient

Many statements of fact are supported by citations.

5 to >0 pts

Developing

Some statements of fact are supported by citations.

0 pts

Not Present

Citations are rare, repetitious or non-existent.

15 pts

Total Points: 150

Research Paper: Abridged Literature Review Grading Rubric