Need a Topic/Title and Research Proposal outline in Power Point format.
Week 4: Research
Ethics and
Professional Issues
Research Ethics and Professional Issues
Learning objectives:
• Gain an understanding of the ethical issues and concerns in research
• Learn the principles to follow when conducting research
1.1. Introduction
Research Ethics is concerned with the ethical issues involved in the conduct of research, the
regulation of research, the procedures and process of ethical review as well as broader ethical
issues associated with research (i.e. scientific integrity and the end uses of research).
Research ethics are the guidelines researchers follow to protect the rights of humans, animals
who participate in studies. Universities, government, and organizations often have
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs).
Ethical guidelines are published by professional organizations such as American
Psychological Association.
Ethical approval is required for all research carried out by staff and/or students. This includes
research where there is no face to face interaction between researcher and participant
(including internet surveys).
Ethics Committee is an independent body in a member state of the European Union,
consisting of healthcare professionals and non-medical members, whose there main
responsibility is to protect the rights, safety and well-being of participants involved in a
research.
Institutional Approval
When institutional approval is necessary for a research project, psychologists are required to
provide accurate information about their research proposals and obtain approval before
conducting the research. Then research is conducted in accordance with the approved
research protocol.
Both the British Psychological Society (BPS) and the American Psychological Association
(APA) have agreed guidelines on the ethical issues involved in psychological research.
1.2. Four Ethical Principles
• Respect
• Competence
• Responsibility
• Integrity
Informed Consent: For any research to be ethical, the researcher must have gained informed
consent from the participants. If the participant is under 16 years old, the informed consent is
provided by their parents or carers.
Deception: Have the participants been deceived in any way? If so, could this have been
avoided? Deception includes: misleading the participants in any way and the use of stooges
or confederates.
Debriefing: is conducted with the participants after the study has taken place. It has a number
of aims:
•To ensure that none of the participants have been harmed
•To make sure that the researchers have informed consent
•To make sure that the researcher allowed the participants an opportunity to remove their
results from the study.
•To make sure that participants had the opportunity to ask question
Withdrawal from the study: Participants have the right to withdraw from the research at
any point. They should also be allowed to withdraw their data.
Anonymity and Confidentiality: Participants have a right to remain anonymous in
publication of the research and confidentiality should be maintained except in exceptional
Note that this is not an extensive list of the ethical considerations involved in research and
professional settings. For a more detailed description of the ethical issues in psychology you
can refer to BPS ethical code (2009).
circumstances where harm may arise to the participant or someone associated with the
research or participant. No names must be used in a research report.
Protection of participants: researcher must protect participants from both physical and
psychological harm
Informed Consent
(a) When obtaining informed consent psychologists are required to inform participants about
(1) the purpose of the research, expected duration, and procedures; (2) their right to refuse to
participate and to withdraw from the research once a study has begun; (3) the foreseeable
consequences of declining or withdrawing; (4) reasonably foreseeable factors that may be
expected to affect participants’ willingness to participate in the research (e.g. potential risks,
discomfort, or adverse effects); (5) any prospective research benefits; (6) limits of
confidentiality; (7) incentives for participation; and (8) whom to contact for questions about
the research and research participants' rights.
(b) Psychologists conducting intervention research that involved the use of experimental
treatments clarify to participants prior to the beginning of the study1) the experimental nature
of the treatment; (2) the services that will or will not be available to the control group(s) if
appropriate; (3) the means by which individuals will be assigned to treatment and control
groups; (4) treatment alternatives that are available to individuals who do not wish to
participate in the research or wish to withdraw once a study has begun; and (5) compensation
for or monetary costs of participating including, if appropriate, whether reimbursement from
the participant or a third-party pay or will be sought.
Informed Consent for Recording Voices and Images in Research
In research that involves recording voices and images psychologists are required to obtain
informed consent from research participants prior to recording their voices or images for data
collection purposes unless (1) the research consists merely of naturalistic observations in
public places, and it is not anticipated that the recording can lead to personal identification or
harm, or (2) the research design includes deception, and consent for the use of the recording
is obtained at a later stage i.e. during debriefing.
Client/Patient, Student, and Subordinate Research Participants
(a) When research is conducted with clients/patients, students, or subordinates as participants,
psychologists take steps to protect the prospective participants from adverse consequences of
declining or withdrawing from participation.
(b) When taking part in a study is a course requirement or an opportunity for extra credit, the
prospective participant is given the option to choose between other equitable alternatives.
Dispensing with Informed Consent for Research
Psychologists may omit informed consent only (1) where research would not reasonably be
assumed to create distress or harm and involves (a) the study of normal educational practices,
curricula, or classroom management methods conducted in educational settings; (b) only
anonymous questionnaires, naturalistic observations, or archival research for which
disclosure of responses would not place participants at risk of criminal or civil liability or
damage their financial standing, employability, or reputation, and confidentiality is protected;
or (c) the study of factors associated with job or organization effectiveness conducted in
organizational settings for which there is no risk for participants' employability, and
confidentiality or (2) where otherwise permitted by law or federal or institutional regulations.
Offering Inducements for Research Participation
(a) Psychologists avoid offering excessive or inappropriate financial or other inducements for
research participation as such inducements are likely to force participation.
(b) When professional services are offered as an inducement for research participation,
psychologists make clear the nature of the services, as well as the risks, obligations, and
limitations.
Deception in Research
(a) Psychology research should not involve deception unless the use of deceptive techniques
is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and
that effective non deceptive alternative procedures are not feasible.
(b) Psychologists do not deceive potential participants about research that is reasonably
expected to cause physical pain or severe emotional distress.
(c) Psychologists explain any deception involved in a study as early as possible, preferably at
the completion of their participation, and inform participants of their right to withdraw their
data.
Debriefing
(a) Upon the completion of the study, researchers are required to provide participants with
accurate and appropriate information about the nature of the experiment or study.
Researchers also share with participants any information related to what the purpose of the
research was, as well as what the findings indicate.
(b) If scientific or human values justify delaying or withholding this information,
psychologists take reasonable measures to reduce the risk of harm.
(c) When psychologists become aware that research procedures have harmed a participant,
they take reasonable steps to minimize the harm.
1.3. Human Care and Use of Animals in Research
(a) Psychologists acquire, care for, use, and dispose of animals in compliance with current
federal, state, and local laws and regulations, and with professional standards.
(b) Psychologists who are trained in research methods and experienced in the care of
laboratory animals supervise all procedures involving animals and are responsible for
ensuring that the necessary measure are taken for their comfort, health, and human treatment.
(c) Psychologists ensure that all individuals under their supervision who are using animals in
their studies have received appropriate instructions regarding research methods and the
carrying, maintenance, and handling of the species being used, to the extent appropriate to
their role.
(d) Psychologists take actions to minimize the discomfort, infection, illness, and pain of
animal subjects.
(e) Psychologists use a procedure subjecting animals to pain, stress, or privation only when
an alternative procedure is unavailable and the goal is justified by its prospective scientific,
educational, or applied value.
(f) Psychologists perform surgical procedures under appropriate anesthesia and follow
techniques to avoid infection and minimize pain during and after surgery.
(g) When it is appropriate that an animal's life be terminated, psychologists proceed rapidly,
with an effort to minimize pain and in accordance with accepted procedures.
1.4. Reporting Research Results
(a) Psychologists do not fabricate data.
(b) If psychologists discover significant errors in their published research, they take
reasonable actions to correct such errors in a correction, retraction, erratum, or other
appropriate publication means.
Plagiarism
Psychologists do not present portions of another's work or data as their own, even if the other
work or data source is cited occasionally.
Publication Credit
(a) Psychologists take responsibility and credit (e.g. authorship credit), only for work they
have actually performed or to which they have significantly contributed.
(b) Principal authorship and other publication credits accurately correspond to the relative
scientific or professional contributions of the individuals involved, irrespective of their
relative status. Just the possession of an institutional position (e.g. department chair), does not
justify authorship credit. Minor contributions to the research or to the writing for publications
are acknowledged appropriately, such as in footnotes or in an introductory statement.
(c) With the exception of some exceptional circumstances, a student is listed as the main
author on any multiple-authored article that is considerably based on the student's doctoral
dissertation. Faculty advisors/supervisors discuss publication credit with students at an early
stage and throughout the research and publication process as appropriate.
Duplicate Publication of Data
Psychologists do not publish, as original data, data that have been previously published. This
does not preclude republishing data when they are accompanied by proper acknowledgment.
Sharing Research Data for Verification
(a) After the publication of the results, psychologists do not withhold the data on which their
conclusions are based from other competent professionals who seek to verify the results
through reanalysis and who intend to use the data only for that purpose, provided that the
confidentiality of the participants can be protected and unless legal rights concerning
proprietary data preclude their release. This does not preclude psychologists from requiring
that such individuals or groups be responsible for costs associated with the provision of such
information.
(b) Psychologists who request data from other psychologists to verify the substantive claims
through reanalysis may use shared data only for the declared purpose. Requesting
psychologists obtain prior written agreement for all other uses of the data.
Reviewers
Psychologists who review material submitted for presentation, publication, grant, or research
proposal review respect the confidentiality of and the proprietary rights in such information
of those who submitted it.
References
American Psychological Association (2003). Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of
Conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
The British Psychological Society (2009). Code of Ethics and Conduct Guidance. Retrieved
from https://beta.bps.org.uk/sites/beta.bps.org.uk/files/Policy%20-
%20Files/Code%20of%20Ethics%20and%20Conduct%20%282009%29.pdf
American Psychological Association (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of
conduct. Retrieved https://memforms.apa.org/apa/cli/interest/ethics1.cfm