HELP
Grading rubric for Qualitative Research Critique
Papers should be no more than 2 pages long. (One extra page for references are ok) Also, upload the article reviewed in your paper with your submission.
|
Section |
Excellent |
Adequate |
Below Expectations |
|
Problem Statement / Background 1 paragraph (10 Points) |
· The problem is clearly stated and well-justified with seriousness of the problem and why it matters · Target population and setting clearly specified · Outcomes of interest clearly specified · Clear, appropriate documentation of search terms, strategies, and databases |
· Problem is adequately stated and justified / supported · Target population, setting, or outcomes of interest specified but issues of clarity · Questionable search terms / strategies or only limited use of appropriate (library) databases |
· The problem statement has little justification or is poorly written · Inadequate specification of target population, setting, and outcome(s) of interest · No specification of search terms / strategies or use of inappropriate search tools (e.g., Google). |
|
Review of the Qualitative Article: 1 page (60 Points)
Review one qualitative article appropriate to problem. |
· Study is clearly related to the specified problem, population, setting, and outcomes · Study is clearly summarized in terms of design, methods, results, and limitations that are relevant to the topic (problem / population & setting / outcomes) of the paper · Clear organization and flow throughout the review of literature |
· Study is indirectly related to the specified problem, population, setting, and outcomes · Study is summarized limitedly in terms of design, methods, results, or limitations that are relevant to the topic (problem / population & setting / outcomes) of the paper · The review of literature is adequately organized overall, but some issues with clarity or flow |
· Study is not related to the specified problem, population, setting, and outcomes · Study is not adequately or clearly summarized in terms of design, methods, results or limitations that are relevant to the topic (problem / population & setting / outcomes) of the paper · Disorganized or not clearly written |
|
Discussion 1 paragraph (20 Points)
Address if study can be applied to clinical practice and how… specifically covering implications for nursing practice |
· Accurate and clearly written synthesis and critique of the reviewed study including assessment of strengths and weaknesses in the reviewed studies · Clear identification of gaps in knowledge / areas where further research is clearly needed · Clear statement of implications for nursing practice, public health, or health policy |
· Some synthesis and critique of the reviewed study, but some issues with accuracy / clarity or with assessment of strengths / weaknesses of the reviewed studies · Some indication of gaps in knowledge / areas where further research is clearly needed, but some issues with accuracy or clarity · Some indication of implications for nursing practice, public health, or health policy |
· Little or no synthesis and critique of the reviewed study or major issues with accuracy / clarity; little to no assessment of strengths / weaknesses of the reviewed studies · Little to no identification of gaps in knowledge / areas where further research is needed; Major issues with accuracy or clarity · Little or no indication of implications for nursing practice, public health, or health policy |
|
Professionalism / Scholarliness (10 points) |
· Correct APA formatting including title page, margins and line spacing · Correct and thorough APA text citations · No issues with inadequate citation or attribution. · Paper is written in the student’s voice without excessive dependence on quotation or paraphrase. (If quotations or paraphrases are used, they are correctly denoted and cited). · Complete and correctly formatted APA reference list · No or minimal problems with spelling, grammar, and punctuation |
· Only minor errors in APA formatting (e.g., title page, margins, or line spacing) · Minor issues with APA text citations · Minor issues of citation or attribution of sources · Frequent dependence on quotation or paraphrase. (If quotations or paraphrases are used, they are correctly denoted and cited with no or only minor errors). · Minor errors with completeness of reference list or with APA reference style · Minor problems with spelling, grammar, and punctuation |
· Major errors in APA formatting (e.g., title page, margins, or line spacing) · Major issues with APA text citations · Major issues of citation or attribution of sources · Excessive dependence on quotation or paraphrase OR inadequate denotation or quotations / citation of paraphrases · Major errors with completeness of reference list or with APA reference style · Major problems with spelling, grammar, and punctuation |