What is the difference between global warming and the greenhouse effect?

Qualities & Criteria

Value

The title is appropriate - Very good (5) - Good (3-4) - Poor (1-2)

5

The introduction states the objectives in terms that encourage the reader - Very good (5) - Good (3-4) - Poor (1-2)

5

The topic is appropriately covered - The topic is explored in depth / Very interesting for researchers (18-20) - The ideas in the paper are correct but there is not much exploration of the topic (12-17) - The ideas in the paper have not much relevance/ Not very interesting (4-11)

20

Originality, overall value added - New information, new perspective, issue, or problem definition (9-10) - Clarity to present understanding, confirmation of present knowledge (6-8) - Not much (2-5)

10

Originality/Similarity Index Score - 25%-35% (15-10) - 36%-49% (9-6) - 50%-75% (5-0) Note: > 75% (the research grade may result in a failing grade)

15

Clarity and readability of the paper. - Easy to read (9-10) - Readable - but requires some effort to understand (6-8) - Difficult to read and understand (2-5)

10

The text is supported by figures and tables - Very good (5 ) - Good (3-4) - Poor (1-2)

5

The conclusions clearly summarize the main results and contributions of the paper - Very good (9-10) - Good (6-8) - Poor (2-5)

10

The paper contains sufficient and appropriate five references - References are new and a large number of good references were cited (3-5) - References are good but some new references could be cited (1-2) - References are old and/or there are well-known references that are not cited (2-5)

10

Language and style - The paper could be published without any intervention (5) - Occasional errors in style (3-4) - Paper needs to be checked for language and style errors (1-2)

5

Proper length and APA format - Very good ( 5 ) - Good (3-4) - Poor (1-2)

5

Total

100